Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I took these photos of your "old car" at the 2004 SAU Show 'n Shine...

It looks remarkably similar :)

Although an immaculate example of an everyday R33 GTS-t, I only took one set of bracketed photos of it.

malcolm_2004.jpg

im with you merli.. clean example of a modded 33 gtst.. but i for one have always been under the asumption the skyline GTX was powered by a ca18 in both r32 r33 and r34 models... or was that the GT-Xi... i cant remember either way.

Edited by rb26s13

lol, this thread took a turn for the interesting. :D

even if it is genuine (it sure does have a lot of plates to support that), since it's now quite modded, it's now a bit of a bitsa spec which would reduce it's collectibility. I must say I did notice some of the build plates say 95/1 and some say 93/12. :)

Wow, impressive. I remember how much money you put into your old GTS-25T, and it looked identical to the '2500R'.

In fact I remember when you had the Trust turbo and the Greddy plenum fitted.

What are the odds of finding a 'Genuine' 2500R in Japan, let alone one that looked like your previous cars twin?

HI THERE :)

NOT REALLY THAT IMPRESSIVE AT ALL - ITS NO WONDER YOURE GETTING MUDDLED ABOUT THERE BEING "2 CARS" THAT LOOK SIMILAR BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH ONE IN THE SAME CAR - NOW I SEE WHERE YOURE COMING FROM - I THOUGHT YOU THOUGHT MY OTHER SKYLINE WAS A KEY FACTOR TO CONSIDER - NOT AT ALL - IT WAS A SERIES 2 PILE OF SHITE !! - THE 2500R "PROTOTYPE" "DEMO CAR" I BOUGHT IS A "TWEAKED" AND "FACELIFTED" GTS-25T - THE ONLY REAL IMPORTANT THING ABOUT THE CAR I HAVE IS THAT IT IS "THE CAR" THAT WAS PULLED OFF THE PRODUCTION LINE AND GIVEN SOME SPECIAL ATTENTION - WHEN I ORIGINALLY GOT IT ALL I KNEW WAS THAT IT WAS THE SECOND OUT OF THREE CARS THAT WERE USED FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THIS WAY - IT CERTAINLY WASNT AS YOU SEE IT TODAY - THERE WERE BITS MISSING AND BITS ON IT THAT HAD TO GO - IT HAD TOO MANY MIX MATCHED THEMES THAT WERENT WORKING HARMONIOUSLY TOGETHER - WHAT WAS WORKING WELL WAS THE FACT THAT GT-R PARTS WOULD EASILY AND READILY BE UTILISED - A GT-R INTAKE PLENUM WAS STILL IN THE BOOT WITH ASSORTED ADAPTER SHIMS AND GASKETS ALONG WITH A HAND WRITTEN LIST IN JAPANESE ON NISMO LETTERHEAD OF OTHER GT-R PARTS EARMARKED FOR INSTALLATION - IT HAD THE RIGHT BLOCK FOR THE CHASSIS (I HAD THAT CHECKED WITH NISSAN IN JAPAN) AND ALL THE CORRESPONDING ID PLATES ALSO MATCHED THOSE NUMBERS WHICH HELPED - NOW THE ODDS OF FINDING A "GENUINE 2500R" IN JAPAN WELL THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE AS THEY NEVER WENT INTO PRODUCTION - AS POINTED OUT IN THE HPI ARTICLE THERE IS NO DEFINITIVE MOULD TO PLACE OVER ANY OF THIS OTHER THAN THE CARS WERE BEING USED AS DEVELOPMENT TOOLS WHICH IN ITSELF IS VERY OPEN ENDED - THE CARS WOULD HAVE ALL GONE THROUGH MANY MANY DIFFERENT CONFIGURATIONS DURING THEIR 2 YEAR TOUR OF DUTY - HOW DIFFERENT IS THE NEW GTR IN RELATION TO THE PROTOTYPE THAT WAS BEING SHOWN 5 YEARS AGO - WITH ALL THE INFORMATION I HAVE BEEN ABLE TO SOURCE OVER THE PAST 7 YEARS I KNOW THAT WHAT HAS "EMERGED" IN MY CAR IS A SOLID REPRESENTATION OF THE DIRECTION THAT WAS BEING FOLLOWED IN JAPAN HAD THE 2500R BEEN REALISED AS A STABLE MATE OF THE 400R AND BEEN "AWARDED" MASS PRODUCTION HOMOLOGATION - IT WASNT TO BE WHICH IN MY MIND IS OF NO CONSEQUENCE AS NOT EVERY IDEA EVER THOUGHT OF GETS SEEN THROUGH TO THE END - THE PLENUM AND TURBOCHARGER ARE JUST 2 ADDITIONS FROM A VERY LONG LIST OF DOZENS AND DOZENS THAT HAVE BEEN THOUGHTFULLY APPLIED OVER THE YEARS - ALTHOUGH SAYING THAT A LOT OF THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS DICTATES ITSELF ESPECIALLY WHEN FROM THE OUTSET THE INTEGRITY OF A "FACTORY SPEC. LOOK" WAS SERIOUSLY ADOPTED AND ADHERED TO - THE INTERESTING THING TO NOTE IS THAT NO ONE WILL EVER KNOW EXACTLY THE "GTX-1 2500R" BECAUSE IT NEVER ACTUALLY HAPPENED - OF 3 ATTEMPTS 1 REMAINS AS TESTIMONY TO WHAT "NEARLY DID" "ALMOST WAS" AND "COULD HAVE BEEN" - KEPT ME OUT OF THE PUB FOR ALMOST A DECADE TOO WHICH CANT HAVE BEEN A BAD THING !! - LATERS - ALL THE BEST - MALCOLM :D

i always wondered why nismo and or Trust would allow a GReddy part to be on one of their proto-types with a Nismo badge on it.

one question...is the car at the S n S and the car in HPI the same car?

Edited by DiRTgarage
i always wondered why nismo and or Trust would allow a GReddy part to be on one of their proto-types with a Nismo badge on it.

one question...is the car at the S n S and the car in HPI the same car?

Nismo does not fit Trust turbos to their vehicles, but thats just the start.

HI THERE :)

NOT REALLY THAT IMPRESSIVE AT ALL - ITS NO WONDER YOURE GETTING MUDDLED ABOUT THERE BEING "2 CARS" THAT LOOK SIMILAR BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH ONE IN THE SAME CAR - NOW I SEE WHERE YOURE COMING FROM - I THOUGHT YOU THOUGHT MY OTHER SKYLINE WAS A KEY FACTOR TO CONSIDER - NOT AT ALL - IT WAS A SERIES 2 PILE OF SHITE !! - THE 2500R "PROTOTYPE" "DEMO CAR" I BOUGHT IS A "TWEAKED" AND "FACELIFTED" GTS-25T - THE ONLY REAL IMPORTANT THING ABOUT THE CAR I HAVE IS THAT IT IS "THE CAR" THAT WAS PULLED OFF THE PRODUCTION LINE AND GIVEN SOME SPECIAL ATTENTION - WHEN I ORIGINALLY GOT IT ALL I KNEW WAS THAT IT WAS THE SECOND OUT OF THREE CARS THAT WERE USED FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THIS WAY - IT CERTAINLY WASNT AS YOU SEE IT TODAY - THERE WERE BITS MISSING AND BITS ON IT THAT HAD TO GO - IT HAD TOO MANY MIX MATCHED THEMES THAT WERENT WORKING HARMONIOUSLY TOGETHER - WHAT WAS WORKING WELL WAS THE FACT THAT GT-R PARTS WOULD EASILY AND READILY BE UTILISED - A GT-R INTAKE PLENUM WAS STILL IN THE BOOT WITH ASSORTED ADAPTER SHIMS AND GASKETS ALONG WITH A HAND WRITTEN LIST IN JAPANESE ON NISMO LETTERHEAD OF OTHER GT-R PARTS EARMARKED FOR INSTALLATION - IT HAD THE RIGHT BLOCK FOR THE CHASSIS (I HAD THAT CHECKED WITH NISSAN IN JAPAN) AND ALL THE CORRESPONDING ID PLATES ALSO MATCHED THOSE NUMBERS WHICH HELPED - NOW THE ODDS OF FINDING A "GENUINE 2500R" IN JAPAN WELL THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE AS THEY NEVER WENT INTO PRODUCTION - AS POINTED OUT IN THE HPI ARTICLE THERE IS NO DEFINITIVE MOULD TO PLACE OVER ANY OF THIS OTHER THAN THE CARS WERE BEING USED AS DEVELOPMENT TOOLS WHICH IN ITSELF IS VERY OPEN ENDED - THE CARS WOULD HAVE ALL GONE THROUGH MANY MANY DIFFERENT CONFIGURATIONS DURING THEIR 2 YEAR TOUR OF DUTY - HOW DIFFERENT IS THE NEW GTR IN RELATION TO THE PROTOTYPE THAT WAS BEING SHOWN 5 YEARS AGO - WITH ALL THE INFORMATION I HAVE BEEN ABLE TO SOURCE OVER THE PAST 7 YEARS I KNOW THAT WHAT HAS "EMERGED" IN MY CAR IS A SOLID REPRESENTATION OF THE DIRECTION THAT WAS BEING FOLLOWED IN JAPAN HAD THE 2500R BEEN REALISED AS A STABLE MATE OF THE 400R AND BEEN "AWARDED" MASS PRODUCTION HOMOLOGATION - IT WASNT TO BE WHICH IN MY MIND IS OF NO CONSEQUENCE AS NOT EVERY IDEA EVER THOUGHT OF GETS SEEN THROUGH TO THE END - THE PLENUM AND TURBOCHARGER ARE JUST 2 ADDITIONS FROM A VERY LONG LIST OF DOZENS AND DOZENS THAT HAVE BEEN THOUGHTFULLY APPLIED OVER THE YEARS - ALTHOUGH SAYING THAT A LOT OF THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS DICTATES ITSELF ESPECIALLY WHEN FROM THE OUTSET THE INTEGRITY OF A "FACTORY SPEC. LOOK" WAS SERIOUSLY ADOPTED AND ADHERED TO - THE INTERESTING THING TO NOTE IS THAT NO ONE WILL EVER KNOW EXACTLY THE "GTX-1 2500R" BECAUSE IT NEVER ACTUALLY HAPPENED - OF 3 ATTEMPTS 1 REMAINS AS TESTIMONY TO WHAT "NEARLY DID" "ALMOST WAS" AND "COULD HAVE BEEN" - KEPT ME OUT OF THE PUB FOR ALMOST A DECADE TOO WHICH CANT HAVE BEEN A BAD THING !! - LATERS - ALL THE BEST - MALCOLM :D

Please, turn caps lock off.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Meanwhile, 20+ years ago, I pulled out the 105mm hole saw and went straight down through the inner guard in front of the airbox to get my stormwater pipe cold air intake in. Right behind the two stock holes for the intercooler pipes. Those have no reinforcement (apart from a couple of robust pieces of steel pipe through them!). I feel that the Australian vehicle standards crews put way too much emphasis on "maintaining the crash performance" of cars and not enough consideration of "any crash is a new and wonderful experiment with a random selection of parameters and you will never be able to tell if an extra 80mm hole through some sheet metal caused a significant difference...but if you close your eyes and squint at the whole structure, engage your engineering brain and have a good think about it, you'd have to expect that it would do jack all."
    • You guys are focussing on the wrong part of this post and have headed off on an irrelevant tangent!  Clearly I'm not going to put my most prized physical possession (well it will be once I'm finished it...) on a piece of shit contraption that might fail and crush me or my car!  At no point was that even implied I was trying to buy a butchered P.O.S that some shonky clown had thrown together with a gasless MIG....  Either way I would love to see the build quality of a rotisserie that has failed.  Actually I'd love to see a photo of one that has failed full stop.  Google fails to deliver.  Never happened?? I'll either make one that won't fail or will buy one that wouldn't fail! End Post.....
    • Yeah, if you can't breathe for more than about 2 minutes, you're cooked.
    • Well, all the power should be getting dissipated across the starter motor. Therefore, ideally, the voltage drop across the earth lead should be convincingly close to zero. Certainly you'd want it to be only a volt or so at max, because otherwise that volt doesn't turn up at the starter to do what is required. A car can probably survive a bad enough earth to crank and start with only 9V or so at the starter motor, maybe even a bit less. But you're seeing only 8V at the battery terminals when cranking, so there can't even be that much available over at the starter, which simply won't do. I would have thought that you couldn't pull enough current (with a healthy starter) to make the battery drop to 8V locally. But I was ignoring the possibility that the starter is in fact crook. If it has shorted windings (or maybe the solenoid is borked and shorting to earth) then I guess it could pull a stack of current and not even look like wanting to turn over. So follow the other boys' reccos too. Because they are just as likely at this point.  
    • Depending where the whole gets drilled, and what country/state you're talking about, quite likely not.   Under ole vehicle mod rules in NSW, VSI06 allowed for drilling of holes in "non structural" areas. So you could drill a hole through the inner guard, and not need engineering. You couldn't drill over seams, and it was advised to add extra reinforcing around the hole, as well as something to protect from sharp edges.   Again, it's all about finding the documentation for where the mod is to be done, AND then being able to explain the situation, with the documentation as to why you don't need engineering, with a positive attitude, to any one of the likes eg, police, vehicle inspector, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...