Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

got defected this weekend aswell. pod, bov, two low, he didnt have a db meter so he said i will be receiving a letter in next few days stating which authorised inspection station i can take car to because two many people are doing dogys. does that sound right?

Do you only get defected for aftermarket kits?

What about gtrs and evos and stis..

They have pretty big fmic already.

they are standard fitment from factory, therefore meeting emission's level's as per manufacture... short answear is its A ok!

I got pulled up on monday.

HWP said I will be getting a letter for exhuast and pod.

Need to go to a dedicated inspection station for them to take photos, send them to the EPA and compare to pictures they have of standard car.

I also have fmic and the dude at the inspection station said I need everything returned to stock or proof it complies with ADR's.

Without getting a emission test, is there anything on the net/or here that states that front mounts are adr compliant. I dont have factory smic, and its a last resort to scrabble around getting all the items.

I got pulled up on monday.

HWP said I will be getting a letter for exhuast and pod.

Need to go to a dedicated inspection station for them to take photos, send them to the EPA and compare to pictures they have of standard car.

I also have fmic and the dude at the inspection station said I need everything returned to stock or proof it complies with ADR's.

Without getting a emission test, is there anything on the net/or here that states that front mounts are adr compliant. I dont have factory smic, and its a last resort to scrabble around getting all the items.

I knew you would get done after i first seen your car on the other forum and you living in campbelltown. And i bet you got done there too, right? HWP are the worst there. I hate going to my mates house at st andrews just wondering if ill get home without being defected. My mate lives around the corner from the cop shop and is on first name basis with one of the cops there now. Hes been done numerous times.

IM240 will test 4 things(correct me if i'm wrong)

THC- total hydrocarbons

CO- Carbon Monoxides

CO2 - Carbon Dioxides

NOx - Oxides of Nitrogen

Some of you other guys may be able to recall the levels that these should be at to pass.

The hydrocarbons is done by taking a reading inside a sealed room to see if you car is leaking fuel vapour, so make sure your carbon canistor is connected correctly, the other three are exhaust readings.

Cheers guys.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
    • WRXs are a pure pleb boring car these days. You need to get an STI to even get close to what a WRX used to be.
×
×
  • Create New...