Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

And that's my point :yes:

No-one has really much info to back that up!

But then for the power/response i was making on my RB25 (GT30), im expecting my GT-SS set-up to eat it alive, just off the factory ECU it already feels more responsive, builds boost earlier etc etc... when i do i'll get a lay-over if my tuner still carries my old graphs, i dont expect it to look in the GT30's favour considering how much nicer the car is now without even a tune

And that's my point :) No-one has really much info to back that up!

But then for the power/response i was making on my RB25 (GT30), im expecting my GT-SS set-up to eat it alive, just off the factory ECU it already feels more responsive, builds boost earlier etc etc... when i do i'll get a lay-over if my tuner still carries my old graphs, i dont expect it to look in the GT30's favour considering how much nicer the car is now without even a tune

Yeah I understand what you mean, and without proof I (or neither of us) can really debate it. I can tell you that my car (RB25 + GT30R) monsters any GTR I have driven for spool etc. I can't promise how much it is to do with vehicle weight however. I've never driven a GTR with GT-SS however, but they wouldn't make any more power than a GT30 would they?

i think the 30r will get you there no problems

ash, i dont think its fair to compare 25 and 26 setups. i believe my results on a 35r at the very least matches a mates 26 with 2530's for response, not to mention the single setup is a million times easier to work on

ash, i dont think its fair to compare 25 and 26 setups. i believe my results on a 35r at the very least matches a mates 26 with 2530's for response, not to mention the single setup is a million times easier to work on

I am glad you said that - I have said similar before and been flamed for it. A mate of mine is making in the high 300kw @ wheels area with his R32 GTR running a .82a/r GT3582R and it feels better on the road than another mates GTR running twin GT2530s. The GT3582R car and the GT2530 are running the same boost, the GT3582R is faster down the 1/4 (trap speed and ET) and doesn't need to be basically bounced off a limiter/launch control to launch without bogging. It feels to me like a better setup, and its far tidier, easier and more impressive to look at haha.

Edited by Lithium

GT-SS is same as a GT30 (both 600hp i believe)

And the GT-SS pull like factory turbos but just keep pulling and you can add another 8-10psi into em

Apart from throttle and plenum, 25/26 are much the same, capacity is a nothing issue really.

I dunno, i just cant see a GT30 on a 26 being leagues better than the 25 like i've felt going from 25/gt30 to 26/ss's... its that noticeable (feels so much stronger at 3000rpm where the 5/bt30 had nothing till 4) i dont think those small differences are whats doing it, least of all a stock ECU

And the GT-SS pull like factory turbos but just keep pulling and you can add another 8-10psi into em

Apart from throttle and plenum, 25/26 are much the same, capacity is a nothing issue really.

I dunno, i just cant see a GT30 on a 26 being leagues better than the 25 like i've felt going from 25/gt30 to 26/ss's... its that noticeable (feels so much stronger at 3000rpm where the 5/bt30 had nothing till 4) i dont think those small differences are whats doing it, least of all a stock ECU

I'm going to really have to go in a car with GT-SS, from what you're saying they spool better than the stock twins?!

comparing the response of a rb26 to a rb25 is about the same as a rb25 to a rb20

Well I can't imagine what an RB26 with a GT30R would be like if thats true (which I doubt)!!! My car seriously makes GTRs feel lazy down low, and nothing too special up high. A stock turbo R32/R33 GTR feels like they have nothing on mine anywhere in the rev range, in my opinion. Again weight comes into it, but the thing even at part throttle starts pushing nicely from 3000rpm - if you still have much throttle by 3500rpm then you're probably breaking a law if you are on a public road.

Well i have a GT3076r ... and producing 270rwkw @17 psi @3500rmp

still with standard manifold and plemum

Been thinking bout this turbo to replace my stockers (rb26), response would be excellent. Full boost @ 3800-3900 with the stockers. With 18psi it had 337hp atw. So better response, peak hp. Main reason is the simplicity as a lot of others have pointed out. Hate the clutterd stock setup, especially after having a 13bt with a basically empty engine bay & a 45min job to replace a turbo.

Quick question & sorry to hijack but how would you retain 02 sensors on a factory ecu?

Edited by Mike__
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys, Just want some advice on r34 GTT ac system. Since I’ve owned it, the ac compressor, doesn’t matter the set temperature or ambient temperature, runs for around 10 seconds then disengages the clutch, then re-engages everywhere 30 seconds or so and keeps repeating this.    is this normal?   I had it recharged today as it was slightly low and thought it would fix it but still does it. it cools fine in summer even prior to the recharge, except for the usual warmup when stopped or in traffic (still yet to wire overheat fan to on with ac)   any thoughts would be much appreciated 
    • To plug the hole. The engine plant may not have known whether the car it was going into had a gauge or not. It was a long time ago and the integrations might not have been fully modern. Or they might not have cared because the extra inventory and processes to save a few cents on the sender might have cost more anyway. But please tell me you are not still confusing the idea of a pressure gauge sender, and an oil pressure light switch. The switch will be out there. In a separate hole. Probably with only one wire running to it. Running the light.
    • Blower needs to go low on the exhaust side, displacing the AC and PS, which you have to decide whether you want to keep and how and where to relocate if you do. Electric option for PS is, at least, helpful. Sadly, there is no workable 12V electric AC of any value. Whilst the blower is the last compression step before the throttle, and so it might seem a good idea to have it near the inlet manifold (as mentioned above), you probably want it to go through an intercooler first, so, having it on the opposite side of the car facilitates that air flow path. The turbo discharges into the blower, so proximity of the turbo's compressor outlet to the blower's inlet is nice. But then you might want to intercool that too, before boosting it again....which would probably be a ball ache. Routing pipes out to the front and back could be a bit shit. If there was room for (at least) a small (but preferably larger) water to air core on that side, then that would probably be the best approach. I guess a reasonable alternative would be to locate the blower where the alternator is (more or less, associated with the inlet manifold, per Matt's thought), and somehow incorporate a water to air core into the manifold, sort of like they do for modern blown V8s. The big difference here though is that those V8s have only the one throttle (upstream the blower) and only the one compression step (the blower) and no need for too much in the way of bypass/blowoff valves. Whereas in a twin charged 6, you do need to think about one or two bypass valves associated with the 2 compressors and you would prefer to have the intercooling done before the air has to pass through the throttle. You'd like the throttle to work approx the same no matter what the compression is doing. But if it is located in hot air stream before a cooler, then sometimes the air will be real hot, sometimes it will be quite cool, and the throttle mapping/response will be quite different between those two cases. The throttle, if sized for hot air, would be too large for cold conditions. It's all a ball ache.
    • Package SC on exhaust side. Remote mount turbo. Still a fair bit of room when you get creative on the inlet side of the motor too. Especially if you can get really creative with the welding, and effectively build it into the bottom of the inlet manifold. Would definitely take some design work, and some trial and error, to make sure flow works well still! Might be easier to just start with the Nissan March though... All the work is already done for you...
    • I'll sit down and get a post together 😁
×
×
  • Create New...