Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys!

ok so this thread is a thread for talking power fc tuning and all associated bits and peices. if you dont like what you see or read here then please save the criticism and go elsewhere...this is a positive thread only please!

its also for those who are completely technically minded, so some speculation is allowed as long as you have something to back the speculation up...lets keep it scientific too please.

ok so here are my two maps at the moment (if you want to comment on them please do):

gallery_30866_2266_77758.jpg

gallery_30866_2266_24033.jpg

most of my tuning is done on the road, with ocasional dyno tuning. this tune is 100% road tuned.

i will post more info about this tune as i have more time, but right now im at work.

my mods are:

RB25DET

Apexi Power FC with Boost Control Kit

Apexi Power Intake

Custom Intake Pipe (AFM to turbo)

Custom CAI (from front bar to pod)

Custom Pod Filter Enclosure

HKS Adj Ex Cam Gear (retard 4deg)

Nismo 555cc Injectors

HKS GTRS Turbo

HPI Low Mount Ex Manifold

Xforce 3"-3.5" turboback exhaust

Just Jap Bar and Plate FMIC

Tuning details:

CAS position is 15btdc with timing light sensor wrapped around the three wires just before they plug into coilpack on cylinder 1. the loop wire gives a false reading on my battery powered timing light.

injector settings in power fc are 66.6% correction and +0.18ms lag adjustment

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

don't want to burst your bubble, but comparing maps is useless because some people have their injectors dialed in differently, different lag times etc and also the CAS can be in a completely different spot and thus making the timing different.

I'm keen to see if any has made and good changes to the other parts of the FC though, or the other tabs in FC-Edit

no i aggree with you there.... but we can atleast say... 'i did this, and this happened'

its not about comparing maps but rather tuning techniques. this thread is about tuning and leraning how to tune. i have books and the way from america about advanced efi tuning. this is a personal project and i am interested in getting feedback from people that know more than me if they are interested in helping. i am just getting the ball rolling on here...

new info above...

Thats a huge amount of timing in the low load cells..i.e in the 50 deg vicinity. I know Guilt toy mentioned not to go over 38 deg anywhere in the map due to increase in cyl temps. Was that BS or not.

I know mine could handle a lot more timing in the top left corner 10x10 but I havent as yet.

also just something i thought about, if you adjust the ex cam gear you alter the base timing by that amount too...so 4 deg retard would be taking 4 deg out of the base timing as well....

can anyome confirm?

If you pull off the CAS to adjust the cam gear, then good practice is to use your timing light and adjust your ignition to the same base timing. Otherwise yes, the whole timing map will be out by that amount.

Here's something about the two maps:

IGN. for full load tuning use Map Watch to follow the diagonal downwards ramp as the engine accelerates from say 1600rpm to 4800. Aim to make the progressive reduction in timing incremental (ie no huge steps). Watch your knock counts in those cells, and be aware of interpolation from adjoining cells. Interpolation is something to be aware of particularly for full load fuel settings as well. This can make it difficult to get a particular cell "nice" because of an artificial raise or drop in fuel or ignition for that cell because of the variance in its neighbour.

INJ. especially on very light trailing throttle decel as you go from load row 2 to row 1 where decel fuel cut occurs, it can be difficult to eliminate a slight throttle hunt that feels like it cycles on-off-on-off-on-off. If you get that feel, check the AFR log via a chart to verify. I have run row 2 very lean (around 15.5 AFR) and it was terrible. At around 13.5 the hunt is greatly reduced but still slightly noticeable. Trying to get any meaningful log of AFR on row 1 is virtually pointless due to decel fuel cut.

As per Mafia's comments, some of the other settings that can be adjusted are worth reviewing too.

i like what you have to say mr dale...

one point about the timing light and cas though...because the cas uses the cam for the 'turning' of the sensor...if you set the timing to that then the intake valves are opening at the wrong time. the timing i would imagine needs to be set to the intake cycle rather than the ex as the cas also tells the ecu/pfc when to fire the injectors...

so hence my question...if i have 4 deg retard of ex cam timing, the do i set the cas to 11deg base timing or 19deg...

The CAS uses the signal to determine the position of the CRANK, not the camshaft. It's just convenient to mount the sensor on the end of the cam. So reset your timing to 15 degrees.

Remember the timing event is described in relation to TDC - Top Dead Centre of the piston through its stroke. So it's all about the crank position.

Edited by Dale FZ1
set the entire row of P01 to 0ign timing if you want your car to pop and fart its ass off on gear change or deaccel

Other than because you can do it, why would you want your car to sound like it's poorly tuned?

Guilt toy mentioned not to go over 38 deg anywhere in the map due to increase in cyl temps. Was that BS or not.

I recall some comments from him about ignition timing, but suspect it was in relation to tuning for emissions. Less advance generally equates to higher exhaust temps. My understanding is that extra advance will result in more efficient running + torque, but past a certain point the emissions output is increased in a certain area. So there is a sweet point for tuning for either emissions or torque, but they are often different. Browsing Guilt Toy's thread about emissions sort of covered his findings.

Edited by Dale FZ1

No, not necessarily. You set a base timing figure, arbitrarily 15 degrees. The amount you see in the electronic map is added to the base figure, to give TOTAL advance. It is total advance that counts.

The reason for checking your base timing is so you don't have to make wholesale changes to the IGN map to compensate for whatever amount it might otherwise vary from the arbitrary 15 degrees.

No, not necessarily. You set a base timing figure, arbitrarily 15 degrees. The amount you see in the electronic map is added to the base figure, to give TOTAL advance. It is total advance that counts.

The reason for checking your base timing is so you don't have to make wholesale changes to the IGN map to compensate for whatever amount it might otherwise vary from the arbitrary 15 degrees.

The PFC on RB25 uses 15 degrees as the idle ignition timing (20 degrees on RB26).

The purpose of setting the 'base' timing is to ensure that the engine is getting the SAME timing as shown on the IGN map.

So with the engine at warm idle, check the H/C to confirm the PFC is giving the engine 15 degs.

Set the timing with a timing light (by moving the CAS) to the same 15 degs.

This ensures the engine receives the same timing as we tell it to on the IGN map.

We get heaps of supposedly 'tuned' cars come in with the base timing out by 2-10+ degrees.

You can usually tell by the big on-boost ignition numbers.

These engines dont need/like more than 40ish degs on cruise and are usually in the teens on boost.

If you are well into the twenties on boost, usually the base is retarded and the engine is getting less than what the map says.........

hi RPMGTR

can you elaborate on tuning with regard to ign timing.

if the ign timing is in the teens on boost with your tunes is it possible some other workshops are balancing boost and fuel levels differently and therefore increasing timing to compensate? or is it always when base timing is set incorrectly?

If you go crazy with your ignition timing on cruise it might not ping due to cylinder pressure being relatively low, but you generally want the flame/pressure front to reach your piston when it is already on the way down. If your peak cylinder pressure is near TDC you are wasting fuel, because the force pushes straight down on the piston, rod and crank and doesn't produce any turning force. The engine is most efficient when peak cylinder pressure is reached when the piston is "half" way down the cylinder, this means the crank journal for that piston is horizontal and maximum leverage / torque is possible to turn the crank. (halfway isn't strictly true but conceptually you can see what I mean).

More advance might also increase your NOx emissions, I can't remember if timing or lean fuel mixture was the primary cause..

Disclaimer:Iamnotanenginetunerandtheabovecouldbecompleteanduttertrashbutlogicall

itmakessensetome.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @joshuaho96 Hmm considering the drama you've seen/experienced, have you looked into getting a built complete long motor shipped from Australia?  Considering the AUD is basically monopoly money when compared to the USD, at a glance this seems like a good option?
    • Bloody Skylines, they put you through the bloody wringer! Stick at it! Stunning drag strip BTW! Where is it? Can see part of the name on the slip and probably should just Google it!
    • I mean the other day I had to walk someone through diagnosing why their timing belt was walking off the cam gears. At least one of the issues was a bent tensioner stud. Local mechanics have found runout on the CAS mechanism causing weird failures. I'm also no saint here I've documented some of the things I've had to learn the hard way. Something I discovered recently is that my CA emissions catalytic converters weren't even welded correctly to align the downpipe to the main cat and they tossed the support bracket that goes from the transfer case to the downpipe to support everything there. I spend a lot of time chasing down these decidedly unsexy problems and the net effect is it feels like I never actually get to the original objective (flex fuel, VCAM, oil control, cooling, etc).
    • At times with how you make everything sound, all I imagine Americans doing when they see a gtr is standing there looking at it and bashing it with a gun like how a caveman would with a club and hoping it fixes itself 
    • I think this is just a product of how the US market works for this stuff. Shops are expensive and there's no real way of knowing what kind of results you're going to get, people don't really have the institutional knowledge. I have heard too much at this point to really put faith in anybody "full service" except maybe DSport and they aren't really a full service kind of shop. If you go to the right place I have no doubt they'll get it right for you. Some locals have set it up right but the cost really is nuts and even now they're still fighting issues. And you know I'm a crazy person who thinks things like twin scroll, relatively short low-mount cast headers, PCV recirc to intake, recirculating BOV, right-sized for ~400 whp, MAF load, validating all of that to a standard comparable to OEM test programs, etc are relevant. For what it's worth, multiple local owners at this point have been stuck in a perpetual cycle of blowing a motor -> getting someone to rebuild it -> some missed detail causes the bearings to wipe and spin just outside of break-in mileage or drop valves or some other catastrophe -> cycle repeats. I usually only find out about this because I'm perpetually helping random friends with diagnosing car troubles, Skyline or otherwise. The single turbo stuff if I'm honest is mostly secondary, it just doesn't seem to achieve the numbers in the ~2000-3000 rpm region that I would expect given the results I've seen here or in Motive's videos. I don't really know what we're missing here in the US to be causing this. Lots of people like to emphasize the necessity of finishing the project first and foremost, but I'm not made of money and I can't afford to be trashing a 15k+ USD engine build with any regularity. Or spending my relatively limited garage time these days unable to triangulate problems because too much was changed all at once. Also, even if it isn't a catastrophic failure I would consider spending the cost of single turbo conversion with nothing to show for it to be pretty bad. 
×
×
  • Create New...