Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

coul dbe simply the way you are using the wideband... i'm assuming right down at the tailpipe? if so make certain you have no exhaust leaks etc. and if it is a stupidly big exhaust you may have accuracy issues anyway.

make sure its calibrated properly too

My method;

Turn ther map trace on the Datalogit on the Injection screen

Watch closely what load cells are being used around the time of the A/F ratio issues

Check the consistency of the values, I have found the odd rouge single cell that isn't obvious until you look at that one cell specifically

You can do the same with the logging, but I find it quicker on the dyno to simply watch what's going on on the screen.

Cheers

Gary

im using the wideband in the stock 02 sensor bung in the dump pipe n it also simulates the narrowband 02 for the ecu.. it pretty mcuh has to be recalibrated everytime i turn the car the car on since it loses calibration every time i turn the car off n just outputs 7.4 over n over.. which can be very frustrating when trying new things..

sydneykid: im a little unclear what you mean, pretty much i log the afr's using datalogit which is plotted N(revvs) Vs P(load) the cells that consitantly play up and differ between the max n mins are the cells that the map tracer follows when the car is coming on boost

i was thinking maybe the 02 sensor is not giving the most accurate readings since its outputting data instantly rather than a avg over a 1/12 sec period... everytime i change it to avg it out it needs to be recalibrated n every time i recalibrate it, it goes back to instant response..

ill add some of the different logged runs when i get the laptop online

There is some knock there.

Have a look at the consistency of your ignition timing around 10/13 and 10/14, there are some anomalies

Have a look at the consistency of your injection around 12/14, there are some anomalies there as well.

Does it misfire when it knocks?

Cheers

Gary

have had a fair bit of knockin but never heard it misfire, i had my own tune i done myself from scratch n had the varying afr issue making it hard to tune past 12psi... then i took it to a performance shop n they started from scratch and got it upto 9 psi and said it has a fuel issue.. they wouldnt change any settings n every run the afr line would be completely different.. and their map is a hell of alot richer n retarded than mine n still has the same sort of problems at the same spots.. i can upload both maps if you would like?

so has anyone else got any other ideas that could cause the afr's to vary so much? could it be the standard coil packs or the iriway7's im running?

U need to check things that affect AFR's (fuel and AIR)

Im guessin if ur fuel pressure is ok it must be a vac or boost leak somewhere.

Regards

Trev

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...