Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For those who were wondering about my threads concerning my R33 AWD RB25DET engine.

I found out today the engine IS from the stagea. Here's some pics of the ecu that was overnighted..

Here are links to the thread with the engine pics for those who didn't see it.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...&threadid=21242

Can anyone tell me anything about the stagea here?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21719-stagea-ecu-pics/
Share on other sites

>Nameless EJ6:

The engine you have possibly came from either a Stagea 25t RS Four, a 25t X Four, or a 25t RS Four V.

It didn't come from a 25t RS Four S because they only came with an MT trasmission.

Stagea 25t RS Four (V, X) - E-WGNC34

Engine: RB25DET 2498cc in-line 6 Turbo

Power: 235ps (174kw) @ 6400rpm

Torque: 28.0kg/m @ 4800rpm

Type: 4WD

Transmission: AT only

Weight: 1620kgs

The Stagea debuted in September 1996, using the R33 FR platform wich used a 2.0L RB20E SOHC engine. The RB25DEt made an appearance in Sept 1997. The 4WD versions make use of a "Syncro Mode" ATTESA 4WD system (50/50 torque split?). In Sept 1998 there was a minor model change, the most obvious differences being the different front grill and incorporated fog-lamps, and the adoption of the NEO Straight 6 RB25, the turbo version which of course put out 280ps. The "Autech Version 260RS", the most famous of them all, had the RB26DETT installed, and took the crown for most awsome wagon from the Mitsubishi Legnum like Nissan had planned all along.

Debut>stcatalogrsv.jpgModel change>stcatalog4.jpgAutech 260RS>stcatalog260.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21719-stagea-ecu-pics/#findComment-460834
Share on other sites

Thanks for that.. I was looking at a page today that has some info on them too.

http://www.auto.vl.ru/catalog/nissan/stagea/1998_8/

It's the 25t RS Four V then.

It's not a neo engine though. And from what I've read on other pages, the 96 came out with the RB25DET. Then they must have switched to the neo in 97 or 98....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/21719-stagea-ecu-pics/#findComment-461014
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
×
×
  • Create New...