Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i think it looks like shit.. not just that i beleive that there is a modification to the front end in order to get the right "caster look" so you dont have a big gap in the front of the wheel, i read somewhere a guy either extended the front or brought it back i couldnt remember but still I say dick that and go 32GTR look

i know what you mean, with the front end almost seeming 'bigger' than the rear in the 32/4 convert

BUT.... if you go full wide-body on the R32... then it'll be sex on wheels... Ilove the R32 sides - but just not fat enough for the massuve R34 front (that's why the R33 does better here stock for stock) so if you go PHAT... it will be mind blowing... you're going all out - might as well wait a bit longer or spend a tad more and perhaps go ALL OUT? :thumbsup:

well just lettin u guys kno,

if anyone ere wants to have my R34 for front end, id be taking it off soon hopefully...

if everything goes in the right way,am thinking in getting my money all set in 2 months time or prob 2 weeks if u guys give me a good offer!! :ermm:

business!business! :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
    • As well as being risky WRT tipping off anyway. Yeah, I wouldn't expect it to move. Just measure from the rear one to the front one on the good side, then measure that same length on the wrecked side. You will find the notches in the pinchweld, and the jacking pad. Just spray a spot of marker paint or something there.
    • but any other area than the bulge you are talking about will just cave in then? The front driver side is pretty bent so I don't know if that will work the way it is now. I can still kinda make out where that bulge is/was but it looks like the position of it also changed due to all the mistreatment? Hard to tell
    • Absolutely. Look very closely at the photo (of yours) that I took my second snip of. See how the sill is thicker material right behind the pinchweld, where the two notches are? That is the factory reinforced area for lifting. That pad is supposed to carry the weight. The factory jack (go look at it, and how it interfaces with the car at the pinchweld) shows you exactly how the load is carried from the car to the jack to the ground.
×
×
  • Create New...