Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Dont worry, I'm in the same boat (no pun intended)..

16th July - Found the car I wanted on a Thursday

17th July - Won the auction and made this thread

18th July - Paid deposit for plates + compliance

21st July - Paid for the car plus the fee of finding/inspecting the car

I was told the car might make it on this months (July) shipment.

..it didnt

4th August - still wondering, had a bit of a moan here

6th August - was told by email it might make it on the ship in the next 2 weeks. *crosses fingers*

(at this rate I might be lucky to see the car in October) :P

In fairness, you guys only get one boat a month, and the cut off dates are pretty early. It's not uncommon to miss boats to Freo. Looking at your dates, the explanation you've been given makes sense.

cry me a river princess ;)

try 2 months - bought 28 June, scheduled to ship 25 August... if it does not get on then, it is war! ill fly over to Japan and load the f**ker myself on to a floating baked bean can and paddle the f**ker back

i bought mine end of april and its still not ready :(

LOL, anyway sorted out all issues. compliance shop should be handing in the papers by tuesday next week from what im told. any idea on turna round time currently for the approval plate?

well just got back from visiting my car, could anyone lend some suggestion? im new at this and not sure where i stand.

now compliance cost $2750, i've paid the $1000 deposit, obviously leaving $1750 left to pay + the $130 tow pickup from the depot. now i know this compliance did cost alot more then usual places, but i was highly recommended to go here and would like to state im pretty happy with the guy working on my car.

now problem is, his told me i should budget about $3500 (not including tyres) for the last payment which included the work he had done ontop. i really only budgeted about $500 ontop of the last $1750 & $130 payment as i assumed that some things needed to be fixed + aftermarket parts refitted (exhaust & air filter), but an extra $1620??.

i did run into problems as some of you's knew, which included:

#1: rear seat belt buckles were missing, i sourced these myself in about 4 hours in my first call to a wrecker once he had informed me he couldnt find any from wreckers and nissan didnt make them brand new anymore. he told me its costing me money for him to look for it so its best i tried and he left it with me. mind you these arent that hard to put on or take off lol, it took me about 2minutes.

#2: he couldnt find his stock r32 GTR exhaust, he tried to source one and spent sometime on it. he then found out his mate had his exhaust. during this time before he found it he said while he is looking for it, it does cost me money. this also isnt a time consuming exercise, i did it in 15minutes on my garage floor. air filter refit & removal isnt a hard task either - maybe 10min?

#3: stock r32 GTR rims dont fit with Brembo's. he had already replaced my brake fluid before finding that out as well. so the resolution is his going to take the stock callipers off another gtr and replace them with mine so that they will fit. then after rego im free to put the brembo's back with my 18" wheels. now he is charging me for this too; including the labour on removing and refitting on the other car too + bleeding of brakes on both cars.

#4: left headlight had some wiring issues - fair enough this is getting fixed.

so my thinking is that:

#1 if i ended sourced them, why do i have to pay ? If he did find them himself then yeah fair enough

#2 thats not my fault since you told me in the beginning you had all the parts you needed to make it stock.

#3 same goes with #2, why is that my problem?

#4 all good.

so approx cost of $1620 on top for that work? now he did carry out all the other things needed in compliance and has dropped all fluids too with the remaining $1750. so pretty much im assuming im just paying $1500 for mucking around with the brakes and maybe $50 of that went to the wiring on my headlight and $100 to removal/refit of aftermarket parts?

any comments/suggestions? for the record im not sledging the company i just want to know if this is how it really is or not and keeping in mind this was his estimated cost not fixed.

Hey mate that sounds pretty tough. I don't have an answer sorry but I'd like to know what people suggest to you as my car is soon to be ready for compliancing too.

I was quoted $2500 + tyres but am a bit scared that this same situation might happen to me.

All the best, hope someone has some good info for you!

thanks dude, well i just sent him an email last night to thoroughly explain incase i may have misunderstood. i also asked him to itemize what work (and products) was included in the compliance fee and exactly what he was charging ontop.

My comments? I think you got shafted. If what you're saying is correct, then that's a bloody disgrace. Those who know me will know I'm generally very supportive of workshops, but when they pull stunts like this, they never get my business.

Too expensive.

Being a workshop ourselves, we charge $2500 plus GST (discount for cash or if you're gonna push numbers our way).

It sounds like he did some extra work, but didn't you let him know the condition of the car before (missing belts, aftermarket exhaust, Brembos) when you got the quote?

We usually have about 5 cars at the workshop for compliance, so if a customer hands us a car like yours, we usually say take it somewhere else to fix it up then bring it back (headlight, seatbelts, etc.), which you could have done a lot cheaper than that.

I'd definitely let whoever put you on to this guy know what's happening too.

And to be fair, let everyone know this workshop's response because there are always two sides to every story.

yep definitely! im waiting on his explanation towards the cost and will let you guys know. im going to let j-spec know about this too but ill speak to them once i have his side of the story too as i dont want to be falsely accusing lol.

yes he was informed by j-spec of all parts/mods that were on the car that needed to be replaced to standard. the seatbelt part he just found out when he pulled out the rear seats and noticed they wernt there which is fair enough. same goes with the headlight problem.

i feel pretty upset about this because when i talked to the compliance shop the first time they gave me great comfort that they had everything under control and he informed me all i had to do was wait 2 weeks max and it would be in my driveway ready to go.

yeah the total amount for compliance was $2500 + gst (excluding refit/removal of aftermarket parts) in which i've paid the initial $1000 deposit already. so leaving $1750 remaining balance + additional $130 tow; im curious as to know why his estimating that i should budget about $3500 for the remaining payment seeing as the only problems on my side is the seatbelts buckles (which i sorted out) & the headlight. $1620 extra for that?

If they told me from the beginning they had all the stock parts they needed, am i expected to pay for the mucking around that they have to go through to get it complied? I mean i would've went somewhere else if they told me otherwise - but its a little to late this far down the track for any other options. hopefully i get some answers soon.

As Iron Chef knows last compliance job I got quoted up for him from a mate "included" quarantine cleaning and inspection (we have on site facility so straight off the docks), after market parts removed for compliance and replaced after registration, compliance, tyres and pit inspection, just plus OEM brake pads if required, we don't give spotters fees either so no need to allow for that.

If something else came up the customer would be informed before compliance started (ISO requirement) and they are given the option to sort them self but if not they have to authorise all work not listed so their is no argument when the car is ready to collect which keeps it simple, also helps when Iron Chef tells his customers the true cost of compliance.

lol I thought you were having a crack at me for a second, Nigel!!

I learnt very quickly that, while some workshops appear very cheap on paper initially, there are plenty of ways they can hit your customers up for extra cash - the ones I regularly send cars to often charge more than others, but a price is a price, and at least you know exactly what you're up for in 95% of cases. The ones that seem cheap often end up being way more expensive by the end of the job.

sadly there isn't much we can do on the forum to help you. it's purely between you and the workshop.

from their point of view if they spend time sitting on the phone organising parts they will still charge you the same hourly rate as they would for working on a car. so you could be paying $100 an hour for him to ring around hunting out a stock 32 exhaust. from your point of view they should have just let you take care of that stuff and saved you money.

personally I agree on a cost of compliance that includes reverting back to standard (if required) and that's it. no surprises come bill time. if I need extra gear like a new battery or whatever I ask for it, or I supply it myself.

if you truly do need to allow $3500 for the last payment as the guy suggests then that puts your compliance cost at $4500 which to my mind is a bit over the odds. but again, if they have spent the hours on bits and pieces and can demonstrate that then it will be hard to dispute the bill. still not a pleasant surprise though. :O

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
×
×
  • Create New...