Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

023 same pump as the 044 but with the open end (like 040). 044 may be an external pump in the catalogue but i think this relates to the fitting on the bottom. plenty of them mounted in tank out there.

still more work to install than a nismo

so either quick easy install vs slightly more fiddly (+ higher labour cost)

Edited by wolverine
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217618-which-fuel-pump/#findComment-3847674
Share on other sites

and if your going the in tank version then you want the 040, 044 is the external version.

actually the 023 is the intank version of the 044. the 040 flows less.

Takes about 20mins end to end to install a bosch, i remember doing it one night with a torch.

if you can modify the bracket by bending or cutting the factory metal pipes, locate the 044 the correct height on the bracket, install a sock on the bottom (additional parts), rotate the clamps on the bracket until they don't fowl inside the tank in under 20 mins you have done well. most workshops will hit you up for more than 20mins but i agree it can be done (like most things with familiarity). the 023 won't need the sock and should mount lower on the bracket and should be less likely to fowl inside the tank.

the nismo one is definitely quicker since you just swap brackets.

i reckon most people spend more than 20mins trying to get that bloody black ring threaded properly. :P

any of these pumps will be a good thing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217618-which-fuel-pump/#findComment-3848113
Share on other sites

have fun mounting a difficult, noisy external pump to the inside of your fuel tank..

stop talking shit jono.

far from a hard or complex procedure.

and you may be suprised to here how quiet this setup actually is.

you can here it prime and that is all, never to be heard again.

its all about rubber mounting it properly as seen in the pic.

i classed it as a very easy install and i had no one to copy off.

now that i have given a pic of the finished install, it aint hard to copy,

and i would agree with nismoid by saying 20 min job.

044 around $210 - $230

fuel sock $30

fittings, stainless clamps, clear fuel hose and high flow non return valve from pirtek $40.

total shoping time 1 hr

total install time for a average bloke 20 - 30 min.

less then $300 all finished

with far greater hp potential.

post-24852-1210149164_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/217618-which-fuel-pump/#findComment-3849588
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...