Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The International Engine of the Year 2008 awards have been announced, and its great news if you like BMWs. They took out Best New Engine, and 2nd and 3rd place for Best Performance Engine.

Unfortunately the VR38DETT didn't do that well. 5th outright. 5th best performance engine. Third best in its displacement class. Not bad, but certainly not as good as you'd expect for something powering a car people are calling a "Mini Veyron" at AUD$150K.

The only thing of note is the judges. The Australian judges are John Carey and Bill McKinnon, who both write for Wheels. Anyone who's read that magazine would also know that the journalists who write for it seem to have regular disconnects with reality.....and most journos seem to have such a hard-on for BMWs that they'd make convention-attending, cosplaying, Trekkies look well-adjusted.

If the rest of the panel is in the same calibre, a lot more of this makes sense.

Source: UKIP Media & Events Automotive Magazines

The list doesn't go up to 10, but I noticed that the VQ engine isn't listed either. If it didn't make the Top 10 in the 3.0L - 4.0L category, this'll be the first time ever that the engine hasn't made it.

Edited by scathing

Also, there's little actual innovation in the GTR engine, plasma bores perhaps. A good one that it is, i don't know of too many technical progressions. Most of it's achievement is in the gearbox.

I'm not a big Wheels fan but i have lots of respect for BMW. Just thinking about BMW adding 2 cylinders to the M3 and actually SHAVING weight from the old engine gets me hard.

BMW spend ridiculous amounts on R&D and, ready for it, actually seem to give a poo about the 'human project'. They deserve every accolade IMO.

Just thinking about BMW adding 2 cylinders to the M3 and actually SHAVING weight from the old engine gets me hard.

a V8 having a much shorter crank (two conrods per crankshaft journal), and a shorter block not made out of cast-iron certainly gives them an easy head-start there.

on a similar note: the head powertrain engineer for the R35 reckons that, even with the tricky DSG gearbox, that the whole drivetrain in the new GT-R is lighter than that of the R34 by a fair bit. of course there's also the benefit of the major masses being situated lower and distributed more favourably.

a V8 having a much shorter crank (two conrods per crankshaft journal), and a shorter block not made out of cast-iron certainly gives them an easy head-start there.

That's called ingenuity :w00t:

Still hard.

I don't understand the way BMW do things- They decided to give the new M5 a V10 so they could jump on the V10 band-wagon and draw some parallels to their F1 engine programme (at the time)... fair enough; but why go and give it the same capacity as the last V8 M5??

confused.gif - I mean it makes good power, yes, but it gets completely smoked for low to mid-range tractability by the 6.3 litre AMG engine fitted to hi-po V8 Mercs. Why not go closer to 6 litres??.

And then the M3- What was wrong with making it a 5 litre V8 that can rev to 8000rpm? Wouldn't weigh any more, and you'd get better everything ('cept w.o.t fuel economy), but I guess that would step on the M5's toes...

The only thing of note is the judges. The Australian judges are John Carey and Bill McKinnon, who both write for Wheels. Anyone who's read that magazine would also know that the journalists who write for it seem to have regular disconnects with reality.....and most journos seem to have such a hard-on for BMWs that they'd make convention-attending, cosplaying, Trekkies look well-adjusted.

I think they're firmly embedded in reality having to lick that much anus just so you'll get priority test drives in next years model for being someone 'favourable' to the company.

The reality of that many shiny rings due to motor journalists tongues is probably too much to bear for most. :w00t:

Another comment about the quality of this award is the fact that they awarded a displacement class to the Subaru 2.5L boxer turbo....you know, the one that's not currently available globally due to problems?

Didn't Wheels also award the Holden Camira and Leyland P76 COTY awards?

japanese have been doing straight six turbo's for how long now?

Have they been doing it as well as this BMW engine, with the same torque delivery as well as fuel economy / emissions frugality?

Just because you build a road car engine doesn't mean you built a good one.

they should have an award for the transmission in the new R35, and guess where it was prototyped and designed, that's right! right here in Australia!!!

Intersting Russ, Got any more info mate.

p.s.

you doin time attack on the 14th?

Interesting to hear some disappointed people here....

Just because the GTR engine is all new and is mounted in a weapon vehicle that most of us love shouldn't/doesn't automatically garuntee it a win in Engine of the Year. The engine is down on specific power per litre compared to rivals, isn't especially frugal, and is likely the least spoken of aspect of the new car.

IMO, BMW's turbo petrol six is an astounding engine for it's very high volume use, and i too look forward to a 135i..... as I am sure are many of the new generation diesels that I haven't as yet been fortunate enough to sample.

I get a little tired of the Wheels/Motor bashing on here, seems many are so blinded by their love for all things Nissan that the hurt of not winning every award under the sun for their beloved brand instantly attracts childish allogations of bribes and bum-licking on the magazines behalf. One must remember that although we may not always agree with their views, these guys are mostly seasoned motor industry commentators with far more knowledge and experience of cars than many on here......

end rant. :wave:

Interesting to hear some disappointed people here....

Just because the GTR engine is all new and is mounted in a weapon vehicle that most of us love shouldn't/doesn't automatically garuntee it a win in Engine of the Year. The engine is down on specific power per litre compared to rivals, isn't especially frugal, and is likely the least spoken of aspect of the new car.

IMO, BMW's turbo petrol six is an astounding engine for it's very high volume use, and i too look forward to a 135i..... as I am sure are many of the new generation diesels that I haven't as yet been fortunate enough to sample.

I get a little tired of the Wheels/Motor bashing on here, seems many are so blinded by their love for all things Nissan that the hurt of not winning every award under the sun for their beloved brand instantly attracts childish allogations of bribes and bum-licking on the magazines behalf. One must remember that although we may not always agree with their views, these guys are mostly seasoned motor industry commentators with far more knowledge and experience of cars than many on here......

end rant. :P

All due respect marlin you are talking through your hat. Having been privvy to some of the graft and corruption that goes on between motoring journo's and car makers It is safe to say that politics is clean compared to that crap.

I read those magazines for the technical info only these days. The journos comments mean diddly squat.

As for the engine not making the top 10, I fail to see see how it could. from my perspective its only the same v that nissan has soldiered on with for over a decade with larger capacity and coated slugs. Still a great engine but hardly cutting edge technology.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • to fix the voltage drop issue I swapped out the old 150amp alternator which turns out is a brand known for having issues and replaced it with the black 180amp alternator beside it 
    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on. Edit: Did some more digging and found a helpful Minkara blog post about the conversion as well: https://minkara.carview.co.jp/userid/1831116/car/1360568/2284209/note.aspx "After installation is complete or the battery is replaced, you need to go into self-diagnosis mode and set the internal air recirculation. The way to do it is to "hold OFF with the key on for more than 5 seconds, set the number to 5, then press 卍→C." ↑↑↑It probably won't make sense unless you actually try it (・∀・)." Lol wtf
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...