Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Item: GTR Adjustable aluminium twin blade spoiler

Condition: Used

Price: $250

To Fit: Suit R33 GTR and R33 GTST

Location: Ferntree Gully, VIC

Contact: Chris

Comments:

GTR adjustable aluminium twin blade spoiler attached to an original R33 skyline boot lid. Will suit R33GTST and R33GTR. Included is a GTR badge. Colour is Nissan QM1 white. Aluminium wing is painted in gloss black. This wing has been tested around Philip Island circuit and is stable and strong at speeds of 250km/h +

Boot lid has two small scratches in the paint surface from sitting in the garage. I can touch up with QM1 white if buyer wishes.

Can offer spray painting services to match your car’s paint code. Costs will be $120 for paint matching and materials plus $100 labour. Paint used will be 2K (2-pac) for best possible shine.

Preferance is for pickup only. Or buyer arranges courier.

Due to size Australia post will not post item, therefore courier will need to be arranged.

post-6928-1210224813_thumb.jpg

post-6928-1210224872_thumb.jpg

That wing looks really cool. When did you have it on your car? I've never seen it.

I've taken it down to Phillip Island a few times. Probably late 2005 / early 2006.

  • 3 weeks later...
Thats not bad price for painting im looking at getting a few panels fixed on my car where abouts is that??

In my backyard.

I'm semi-handy with a spray gun..

I have checked the Vic Roads web site and found no regulations in regards to spoilers/ GT wings. Which is curious because they cover almost everything else. No results when searching for "spoiler" or "wing"

There is nothing specific to spoilers in the "Guide to modifying your vehicle" - Click Here

Page 6 - Section 16 refers to protrusions. "A modification to a vehicle must not result in: Any object or fitting, protruding from any part of the vehicle in a manner likey to create the risk of bodily injury to any person."

There is nothing in the "Drivers Field of View Requirements" - Click Here

Nothing in "Common Questions" - Click Here

Nothing in "Roadworthiness Requirements" - Click Here

Also read Post#21 here - Click as Trent from URAS had to go through getting approval for his wings. I don't see that this one is that different from his and it has the end plates discussed and doesn't protrude the extremities of the vehicle.

Draw your own conclusions. Bottom line is if a cop thinks it's illegal he's going to give you a roady even if it is perfectly legal.

In my opinion it's more legal than any aftermarket bullbar on any 4x4 getting around.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...