Jump to content
SAU Community

Boost Cut Defender


rs73
 Share

Recommended Posts

whew......

finally received my S-AFC and Turbosmart boost valve...

at what psi level do I start to need boost cut defender??

I assume boost cut defender = fuel cut defender ? is it correct?

Turbosmart made one for abt $100 for valve type and $175 for electronic one... which budget product is better value for the dosh$$$? I'm pretty tight here already, still need to save more $$$ for exhaust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the RB25DET (in fact almost all Nissan turbo engines) uses the AFM signal to cut fuel on over boost you can’t use a simple pneumatic bleed to defeat it :( You'll need an electronic defender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thx....

however if I only running around 10psi, fuel cut shouldn't be an issue??? I'm not after very ambitious boost as my auto gearbox may not hold...

unless circumstances change and I manage to convert my auto to manual.... :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'll be fine on 10psi :O Where your car hits the boost/fuel cut will depend on the density of the air, i.e a cold night / early morning it'll hit the cut on lower boost than during a mild day and so on... But 10psi shouldn't be enough for it cut @ all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, it's not the reduced knock margin. It is a direct mechanical effect of having to initiate the combustion earlier, while the piston is still rising, which starts to exert combustion pressure on the rising piston earlier, making the rest of the engine work harder to finish driving the piston up to TDC where the combustion pressure stops being a negative and starts being a positive. Your modern engine that only needs ~10° to make MBT doesn't waste the other 10 or so degrees of crank rotation. That's almost all of it. The difference in knock margin might go either way. Remember that modern engines to which you are currently comparing the long tractor engine (the RB) are now running super high compression, direct injection, tricky cam control and maybe even cylinder pressure sensors. You're not comparing apples with other fruit. It's apples and sea weed, or some other evolutionarily primitive vegetation. And remember, squish only really comes into play at the very end of the stroke. It certainly does good things, but it is not the biggest contributor to what's going on. It is quite possibly much less important in 4 valve head than 2 valvers also, because there is so much less squish available to a 4 valve anyway.
    • Food for thought, a longer stroke motor would need less ignition timing vs. a shorter stroke motor requiring more ignition timing.
    • Thanks Duncan, HART is only 10 mins from me (I did my bike license there), it'd be awesome if it ran these types of things.  Sutton Road does look good and they take fewer cars than SMSP which is good.  Surely you have enough land to lay a few million tonnes of concrete and some sprinklers D? 
    • I thought an engine that needs more ignition timing to make power is going to result in less power due to reduced knock margin? More time for the combustion to propagate -> more time for it to heat up the rest of the mix to detonation.
    • DCS, war thunder, IL2 - mostly flight sim games.
×
×
  • Create New...