Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Someone lifted the lid a fraction early....

Just days after Ferrari launched the teaser site for its new GT, the first full images and details of the Ferrari California have been revealed. Even though the countdown timer on the teaser site still indicates there's a week to go before the next info reveal, the countdown itself is little more than a formality.

Like other modern Ferraris, this one is fabricated from aluminum to keep mass under control. The 460 hp 4.3L V8 is the first from Maranello to use direct injection while following the racing tradition of using a flat-plane crankshaft. This car of firsts also debuts the production application of a dual clutch gearbox from Ferrari. The 7-speed unit is mounted in a rear transaxle configuration and should provide smoother shifting and even better performance than the existing hydraulically-actuated units that Ferrari currently uses. Acceleration to 60 mph should come in under 4.0 seconds.

The California is also Ferrari's first retractable hardtop convertible. From the shape of the hood scoop and headlights to the sweep of the rear fenders and vents behind the front wheels this car obviously draws on the heritage of the original 1960s 250 GT California. At the same time, it's blended with modern Ferrari design elements drawn from the current F430 and 599. We're looking forward to seeing much more of this car over the months leading up to the Paris Motor Show!

ferrari-gt-1280-02.jpg

ferrari-gt-1280-03.jpg

ferrari-gt-1280-01.jpg

Pic of classic 250GT California for reference:

ferrari-250-gt-spyder-california-1.jpg

Gorgeous! Except for silly IS-F stacked tailpipes.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/219087-ferrari-california/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

cameron.jpg "The 250GT California: It is his life, it is his passion..."

'...it is his fault he didn't lock the garage door :P' 165036__ferris_l.jpg

Not a bad looking bit of gear. A few try-hard details, but that's just like all Ferraris these days. Expect a waiting list that stretches past 2012 though...

Cheers for posting.

I think it looks like a pair of dogs balls with David Hasslehoff's coked-up smile pinned to it with blu-tack.

It's a mess of different styling: Gran Turismo grille, MR-S style eyes and nose, Korean designed scoop (but acknowledging it's derived from the 250GT) and ridiculous motes carved into the doors. It holds together well from the rear-quarter image, it has more geometrical harmony than the front.

Too bad the front and rear appear to have been designed by two different crackheads. They lack symmetry, and i'll wager that's because the engine is too bloody big. That's a good thing, so i can forgive the aesthetic orgy before me and marvel at the fact drug addicts now make Ferrari's.

I thought they only made Lambo's.

I don't mind it... Don't like the arse, or the grill/nose, not a fan of the side rear quarter panel... Too sweeping.. Could look a little tougher...

I agree, the 430 is quite possibly the hottest/horniest/gorgeous Ferrari's ever...

I agree the 360 was nice, just lacked an intrinsic aggression and stance about it... :D

Can't wait for the new 460 though!!! :bunny:

Edited by Marco-R34GTT

The side profile is real hot.... other than that it looks more suited for me missus. The front looks something merged between an MR-S and an Aston Martin of some sort and the rear muffler ruined the rear I reckon. Whats the retail on one of those?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
    • Is MAF load really that bad? I'm not trying to do big power, my only real desire is VCAM and flex fuel support so I'm not terrified of blowing my engine apart from CA's appalling 95 RON "premium" fuel. Stuff like playing with closed loop boost control and really dialing in my transient fueling and ignition are frankly just to prove to myself I remembered something from uni.
    • Thats what ive been doing. Ive got a million questions but i know theyve probably all been answered before at some stage. Todays research included nismo heritage seat covers, s3 projector headlight retrofits and how to remove/paint the rocker covers 
×
×
  • Create New...