Jump to content
SAU Community

Veilside Body Kit For R33


Recommended Posts

If you like the veilside kit or any others get it. At the end of the day only one person has to like it and that is you. Bulid the car you want not what everyone else wants you too.

+1, build the car for urself, not for others.

saying that i think the veilside kit looks like dogs balls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I don't like the front bar on the Veilside kit, but I don't mind the sides, back bumper and wing. Will probably put these on my car as well as a 400r front.

Go for it, at the end of the day it's your car and you should be able to customise it however you want and whatever people say, who cares really as it's your car!!

My 2 cents..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only good thing about veilside body kits is after two weeks 99% of them only have half of their front bar left. Meaning we are only subjected to 50% of the potential ugliness.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank all the gutters, driveways and speed bumps killing veilside bars all day, everyday.

sadly, as time progressed they got worse

er34frontmr2.jpg

and in real life...

3082206am0.jpg

3082207rk6.jpg

Edited by Granthem
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the very car in the pic had a decent front bar i am quite sure most of us would get wet over it. That stupid looking twisted mess on the front of it just kills it tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I personally dont mind the rear bar! its something ive been considering for my 33 as well.

As for the rest i dont like it. although the grey picture above posted by grantem kinda reminds my of the lamborghini everton...but still dont like it :) each to their own though :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a bit of a ricer, like things for how they look etc...

but you know how people put HUGE rims on their car, and then the rims are the center point of the car, more so then the car itself? That's how I see this kit...

There is just WAY too much of it...

Put it on your car if you want, but that front bar is chat :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Seatbelt bolts are 7/16 UNF in most cases
    • Yes, this is why I end up being 'vocal' with executives. "I want it" can't be "Just because we should have it" you need reasons. It has way too big knock on effects to simply want something "Just because" at that level in orgs with 10,000+ employees. Currently, message labelling. Sounds great. Except there is no governance on how to actually HANDLE message labels, so I may as well implement the labels as "Pink Flamingo" or "Conrod" or "Massive Dildo" and force people to choose one for every message, with no framework underpinning any of it. It has no value and can actually have detrimental value if all it does is serve to annoy people into clicking something random, or just using the default for everything, especially if there's no repercussions for getting it wrong, no monitoring for people doing it right, and no guidance on what needs to be what label. "But we need message labels!" f**k sake.
    • It's worse than that. They cannot even picture the full scope of what it is that they are pitching or wanting. They see the core idea and cannot conceive of any of the side effects, compromises, losses of existing functionality that needs to be replaced somehow, etc etc, that come with doing these things. So how can they do a cost/benefit when they don't even know what the full set of changes actually looks like?
    • I mean something people seem to be WOEFUL at is doing a proper cost/benefit analysis. Going cloud is great, if it saves you time and money. Does it? I have found a LOT of managers just want 'the new thing' with SUB-zero understanding of what it is and how it functions and why they need it. I spend a lot of time on that point nowadays too.
    • I'm an engineer. I am not supposed to do IT. I have been doing my company's IT for 25 years, because initially there was no one else capable and since because I don't trust anyone. Back in the day, we used to run a Linux server with just sendmail level mail handling. Everything was POP and SMTP. Then, someone demanded calendaring and the like, so I implemented Scalix (an OS Exchange clone) - from scratch. Migrated all the numpties over, administered that system for years. Then Scalix started to decline. So I spun up a full Zimbra system. Same same as Scalix, but different (ie, not even a fork). Ran that for a while in parallel with Scalix as I tried to migrate old users over. Both of these were on prem, with local backup in the case of Zimbra. (No backup at all on the Scalix server! Gasp!) At some point, I spat the dummy, after years of this, and capitulated and bought O365 for the whole company and migrated everyone off the on prem stuff and shuffled them off to the cloud. It has been easier and shitter ever since, seeing as MS cannot leave anything alone for more than 3 minutes and have to keep changing everything and making it "better' (I read that as "harder"!). It's like their entire crew are ADHD squirrels on meth. Meanwhile, all our data has been kept on prem on file servers with decent backup. Now the higher ups are demanding that we migrate all the data to the cloud. I am shuddering at the idea that it will all be held to ransom on some shit AWS or, even worse, Azure/Sharepoint system where you're at the mercies of the above posted price hikes, commercial disputes, company collapses/takeovers/DOS attacks/etc etc. I hate it. But... if it can get me free of the bloody IT shit so I can finally concentrate on real engineering work for the first time in 25 years, then.... good?
×
×
  • Create New...