Jump to content
SAU Community

Haltech R35 Gt-r Dyno & Drag Results Thread


Recommended Posts

I was down at Gas Motorsport today for some closed door dyno testing.

Haltech have their R35 GTR running o their Platinum series ECU ( available later in the year)

Its a prototype set-up and they are still ironing some bugs out but so far doing well.

They replaced the centre muffler and cat with straight through pipe but it made no difference to power. Also tried removing the rear muffler. This also made no tangible difference.

But upping boost to 15psi and doping some fine tuning meant power went from 2987kW stock to 356kW at the wheels.

Not bad huh

Will be at Compak Attak tomorrow.

[mod edit: Edited thread title to include drag results]

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I was down at Gas Motorsport today for some closed door dyno testing.

Haltech have their R35 GTR running o their Platinum series ECU ( available later in the year)

Its a prototype set-up and they are still ironing some bugs out but so far doing well.

They replaced the centre muffler and cat with straight through pipe but it made no difference to power. Also tried removing the rear muffler. This also made no tangible difference.

But upping boost to 15psi and doping some fine tuning meant power went from 2987kW stock to 356kW at the wheels.

Not bad huh

Will be at Compak Attak tomorrow.

wow, looks like they de-tuned it pretty good :happy:

Yep 11.1 @ 124mph was the best run w/ launch control on. They dialed in 11.0 for the bracket drag but launch control sequence wasn't dialled in 100% correctly. Still ran an 11.5 @125 and an 11.8 @ 126 without launch control.

Pics, timeslip and story @ www.gtrblog.com

Full photo gallery coming soon

gains were never that big with past GTR's from just an exhaust... this car looks like it will run 10's with just a bit of boost and tune... amazing

yeah i guess big was a poor choice of word...noticible was more what i was thinking!

Terrific result.

Once we start seeing high 10s with basic mods like this, when tuning has been better developed, that will just be ridiculously fast.

How much cash will your old GTR's need to match that?

Terrific result.

Once we start seeing high 10s with basic mods like this, when tuning has been better developed, that will just be ridiculously fast.

How much cash will your old GTR's need to match that?

Not as much as it will cost to buy this car. :banana:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...