Jump to content
SAU Community

Haltech R35 Gt-r Dyno & Drag Results Thread


Recommended Posts

11.1 and 126mph from a car that weighs 1740kg, and has had no mechanical changes, is nothing short of staggering.

all hail the new king of performance cars

Maybe the new ecu is a cuppla hundred kg lighter than the factory jobbie. :banana::teehee:

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

fantastic result for first time out!!

i remember being happy when my evo ran 12.4 with autronic, 3 inch turbo back exhaust, aps cold air induction, etc

boost incease and tune & 11.1 @ 124 excellent! 10's are coming very soon

So what happens when they make some more adjustments to the tuning and on a good warm day it runs a 10.9sec and they are forced to put a cage in it, will they?

Because it can't be more than a month away before it does run a 10sec pass but I can't see them wanting to strip out a perfect good R35 just to run another 10sec pass.

Its interesting that it had a higher trap speed on the third run, without the correct launch control (which as far as I understand is just the equivalent of dumping the clutch in a manual). I wonder what happened there...

very impressive especially considering that it's running street tyres. imagine what gains there would be with some semi slicks or even better some proper drag radials. :)

I think it might be a bit of a challenge fitting the 255/50/16 radials over those gi-normous brakes. :)

But running a 10 with basic mods on factory rubber and stock everything else including exhaust is phenominal. Just shows you how well this car has been designed and engineered.

Sign me up...

though I don't know if an owner would want to modify a street driven one it while its still under factory warranty if it will void the warranty... what do you guys think?

Depends on how cashed up they are?

If the purchase price was the absolute max they could afford, then I guess they wouldn't.

However, if $$$ aren't a major factor then anything goes...

Yeah definately with that mile on the third run it would have been a 10 second pass!, our first 10 pass was 10.8@ 129 mph

so the haltech gtr with a good launch is already capable of 10's. excellent result.

Edited by giant

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...