Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

Looking on my mates car his blue jap ID tag says its an RB20D 1998 CC and he has an R33 S2 :w00t:

Now R33 don't come out with RB20 full stop. How could this have been complied if just those number along don't make any sense? Any one else comment on what there Blue ID tag says?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/219901-nissan-r33-blue-jap-id-tag-question/
Share on other sites

oh they do my friend.there were a limitied amout built with a RB20E engine or something.there are a few people on here with them i beleve and i also have a friend that has a R33 s1 with this same engine.

is your mates car turbo?

Jack

yeah he has a 5 speed S2 Turbo 5 stud wheel pattern. So does that mean engine swap before it got complied?

oh they do my friend.there were a limitied amout built with a RB20E engine or something.there are a few people on here with them i beleve and i also have a friend that has a R33 s1 with this same engine.

is your mates car turbo?

Jack

Edited by the97skyline
probably swapped.....post up or pm me the vin we can check it out.

Or could they have swapped tags before it was complied? Is there a hidden place that they would have stamped the cars vin from factory?

His details are:

HR33-102280

vin: 6U90000HR33102280

Edited by the97skyline

vin shows that it was not originally an r33 gts-t. All gts-t's begin with ECR33 not HR33.

2 door

GTS HR33 (FR) RB20E

GTS (latter term) HR33 (FR) RB20E

GTS urban liner S HR33 (FR) RB20E

GTS urban liner HR33 (FR) RB20E

4 door

GTS Type-S (latter term) HR33 (FR) RB20E

GTS Type-X LImited (latter term) HR33 (FR) RB20E

GTS Type-X (latter term) HR33 (FR) RB20E

GTS Type-G (prior-term * mid term) HR33 (FR) RB20E

GTS Type-XG 40th HR33 (FR) RB20E

GTS Type-XG (prior-term * mid term) HR33 (FR) RB20E

GTS (all period) HR33 (FR) RB20E

yep definately started life with an rb20de......

btw not sure how you got the car, but it really should never have been complied with that vin (and it is very likely the compliancer knew from the vin). if you wanted you could probably pursue compensation

post-74-1211276700_thumb.jpg

yep definately started life with an rb20de......

btw not sure how you got the car, but it really should never have been complied with that vin (and it is very likely the compliancer knew from the vin). if you wanted you could probably pursue compensation

yeah he is chasing it up with Vic roads and also trying to get the details of the actual compliance place that did the car.

They didn't make RB 20E engins in 97 ? Nissan stoped them in 95 didn't they?

Edited by the97skyline
yep definately started life with an rb20de......

btw not sure how you got the car, but it really should never have been complied with that vin (and it is very likely the compliancer knew from the vin). if you wanted you could probably pursue compensation

If the car was complied under the old scheme when unlimited mods were allowed (green alloy compliance tag), prior to SEVS, it probably is not a problem.

But if the car was complied under sevs (pink complinace sticker) then there could be a problem

If the car was complied under the old scheme when unlimited mods were allowed (green alloy compliance tag), prior to SEVS, it probably is not a problem.

But if the car was complied under sevs (pink complinace sticker) then there could be a problem

No it has the green compliance tag

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...