Dyno Results

[R31Nismoid]

Oh, yeah i saw that, doesnt say much about the BW things though.

[juggernaut1]

Oh, yeah i saw that, doesnt say much about the BW things though.

Huh?

Click on the first link i posted - then in the top right hand corner you will see another icon BORG WARNER TURBOCHARGERS which is a link to the BW range.

[STR8E180]

its still on a very safe tune

i told my tuner to keep on going untill it starts running into problems like pinging but we both changed our minds because of the standard bottom end

so its still on a very safe tune normally i would keep on going for more power untill it starts running into problems and then back of to a safe zone but i was happy with 360kw so we left it at that

Edited August 22, 2008 by STR8E180

[Butters]

dude, why is the intake temp less then the ambient temp ! I assume the tuner left the temp probe on the dyno.

Your reading will be lower then others.

Also explains why you made less low down hp in this tune then your original tune on page 1

Edited August 22, 2008 by Butters

[STR8E180]

that would be caused from the longer duration cam shafts which went in

still running a 264 intake cam but the exhaust cam was swapped over for a 272 duration cam

the twin scroll setup seems to perform alot beter with a longer duration exhaust cam as u can see

[juggernaut1]

Str8e180 - are you running the T3 divided manifold or T4 divided?

Looks like T3 divided judging by the A/R.

[STR8E180]

Str8e180 - are you running the T3 divided manifold or T4 divided?

Looks like T3 divided judging by the A/R.

divided T3

[juggernaut1]

Thanks for that.

Full-Race have been using divided T4 1.06 ex a/r on their GT35 setups. See below link of this setup on a Subaru EJ25 (2.5 litre). Granted there not the same engines as a RB - but they both have similar capacity.

http://www.iwsti.com/forums/engine-power-p...out-5-24-a.html