Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi all,

i know that when a stock turbo fails on the gtr, the ceramic dust gets sucked into the engine and kills the engine. However i have only heard of this happening to r32's and r33's , mostly r32's. Has anyone heard of this happening to r34's . I know for sure that all r32, r33 and r34's (except the n1 and nurs )

have ceramic wheels so the potential is their. But i still haven't heard of any r34's doing this. Does anyone know of any r34 gtr's who have had their engine killed by the ceramic dust.

regards

mike

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/221039-turbo-failure-on-rb26/
Share on other sites

Ceramic dust??? How does dust from the exhaust turbine get into your engine?

I was under the impression that when the turbo's fail it's the ceramic exhust wheel that delaminates from the shaft due to the glue/bonding agent can't cope with the additional heat generated by extra boost. If you continue to run the engine after the exhust wheel has delaminated then the whole rotating assembly will be horribly out of balance, causing the metal compressor wheel to scrape the compressor housing and sending fine shavings of metal through your engine.

Ceramic dust??? How does dust from the exhaust turbine get into your engine?

I was under the impression that when the turbo's fail it's the ceramic exhust wheel that delaminates from the shaft due to the glue/bonding agent can't cope with the additional heat generated by extra boost. If you continue to run the engine after the exhust wheel has delaminated then the whole rotating assembly will be horribly out of balance, causing the metal compressor wheel to scrape the compressor housing and sending fine shavings of metal through your engine.

The shafts in turbo chargers spin at speeds in excess of 100,000rpm. So there is no point hypothesizing about where the bits of turbine wheel, shaft & housing are going to end up because the answer is everwhere. Including in your precious RB26.

I wouldnt be worried about turbo pieces going in your engine mate, most turbos fail at the exhaust side of the scope, I had a twin turbo engine previously and blew 6 turbos on it, never had any drams with engines, you see when one turbo fails the other turbo can not produce enough boost to even read 3 psi (read from gauge) , because pressure will always take the easiest option out, meaning that one turbo has failed and the other will just basically push air in to the other one because its closer (pressure follows path of least resistance) so i would imagine that as soon as the turbo fails there wouldnt be enough pressure to even push it through your FMIC etc . . correct me if im wrong just a thought!

you know, that is the reasonable answer.

But I have seen so many GTR engines killed by ceramic turbine failure (including my first, virgin rebuild) that it is just not true. when the gtr turbs let go you can end up with material in the bore that stuff it, badly. no difference in the 32-34 except for its age

I wouldnt be worried about turbo pieces going in your engine mate, most turbos fail at the exhaust side of the scope, I had a twin turbo engine previously and blew 6 turbos on it, never had any drams with engines, you see when one turbo fails the other turbo can not produce enough boost to even read 3 psi (read from gauge) , because pressure will always take the easiest option out, meaning that one turbo has failed and the other will just basically push air in to the other one because its closer (pressure follows path of least resistance) so i would imagine that as soon as the turbo fails there wouldnt be enough pressure to even push it through your FMIC etc . . correct me if im wrong just a thought!

Use the search button and you will find plenty on this topic . I even posted pics a few years ago for the none believers to see what happens to the engine . It is the exhaust wheel that lets go and becomes dust, gets sucked in via open exhaust valves and the rest is history....

My theory is that it is due to cam shaft overlap. The exhaust valves don't shut completely before the induction cycle starts. There is therefore some return of exhaust gasses from the manifold which now contains the ceramic particles that used to be your exhaust terbine.

  • 7 months later...

Thought I'd bump this thread since I couldn't find anything rb25 specific, and I suppose my question doesn't differ much anyway. Short story is my turbo went, compression came back as 125psi on each cylinder, dry test (r32 rb25de-t) Now I'm in the process of getting the new turbo put in and uprated injectors. Turbo was a slide hi flow

Now the compressor wheel did lunch itself, the mechanic found light metal shavings behind the pod, and some small bits near the IM. Now since my compression test came back ok, is there anything else to watch out for, or is it probable that the engine is ok if the compression tests consistent? Only idled the car once or twice after the turbo went, and tried to boost it twice 30 secs or so after the turbo went. Pretty much figured the turbo was stuffed when it didn't boost.

Getting the FMIC and all the intercooler piping flushed out as a matter of course. Also new engine oil and filter, since the turbo was leaking oil when I shut it off.

This is a known fact.

ceramic particles traveling that fast aren't going to be stopped by exhaust gas.

Imagine shooting an bullet (even if very small) into your exhaust port against the gas flow.

Slaughter and others;

* the damage occurs through the exhaust port . Not the intake.

Compressor side failures while being bad arent as bad as an exhaust side failure on a GTR. A compressor side failure still blows its air through your intercooler which does filter it a little. Compressor side failures will probably never happen on a gtr with stock turbo's anyway unless the intake injests foreign particles that cause the compressor wheel to break.

Like Rev210 says with his bullet theory. Consider the inertia energy of a wheel spinning at 100,000 rpm. Its going to go wherever it wants to go when it comes off the shaft. No amount of gas flow is going to changed the direction the wheel wants to go.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you really don't want to touch anything you can try to trigger off the timing loop just to see if it's sparking semi-regularly. Don't trust it for actual timing measurements.
    • Also replace the fuel filter aswell today
    • Hey everyone, I have a r34 GTT s1, im having a problem with my skyline, ive let the car sit in the garage for the last couple of months and havent run it and ive gone to fire her up today and it cranks but doesnt fire, i have been having problems with it previously where it wouldnt start again after driving it around for a bit. It use to start fine on cold start ups but if you drove to the petrol station and fueled it up and went to go start it again, it would just crank and not fire untill you let it rest for a few hours, the car doesn't over heat it sits perfectly in the middle while driving when warmed up. Im thinking this problem has caught up maybe and now it just wont start at all. The car runs on e85, ive checked the e85 seems to be fine. I can hear the fuel priming before you go to start it and checked all my fuses and relays. List of things I replaced today - New battery - New sparkplugs - New Coolant temp sensor I was thinking about testing the CAS but from what ive seen online, if the CAS is cooked, the car will actually start up but then die instantly? as mine just doesn't fire at all. Does anyone have any idea or have encountered the same problems? thanks
    • Modern reg stuff now, they'd have a wide input range which would push through a buck converter, it would need to be able to maintain voltage for cranking conditions (sub 9V at times). Likely runs something like an internal 6V rail, and then further voltage regulators depending on which circuit/area it is feeding. Modern voltage regs, like what I'm starting a new power supply design with at work, will let me run a 5V rail output, and as long as my input is equal to or greater than 5V, I have a 5V output. Except I'm not pushing a 5V rail in our system as I don't need one, we're setting up for a 3.8V rail. Our new design will allow me 6 to 60VDC input, and everything else doesn't care, even when I start pushing a few Amp outputs.   Realistically, the voltage drop off could be caused by a few things though, one could be literally the alternator is dieing, and hence charge power is dropping, which also means on a straight hard pull you're starting to send the battery flat... (Not that likely from a single couple of gear pull if the battery was fully charged). However, having earth issues, like stray earths not connected, or someone having put a ground loop in, will see the ECU appear to end up with lower voltage "input", mainly because the "ground" is no longer equivalent to battery negative. If they're comparing the input voltage using sensory ground for example, and sensor ground is what is in that ground loop, than the sensor output voltage will actually start to be reduced, when compared to battery ground... Yeah, ground wiring design can start to be a bitch... Also voltage going weird from inductive loads not being managed properly is another real bitch... Hence, why I asked above about how everything was wired in. If OP knows, and can post all of the actual connections from the ECU pin out, as well as what wires are joined where in the loom, which grounds from the ECU have ground points and where they are etc. Would help to see if there is a ground issue. The part I'd start with though, is putting a mechanical oil pressure gauge on to confirm the theory. Otherwise the next track day when the threshold is lowered could result in another of @Duncan favourite types of jokes... Knock knocks... Pretty sure this is what @GTSBoy is also self high fiving...  Is all great that we have a decent theory... But they need to prove it before relying on it...  
    • When I worked at BlueScope Steel, we had an Ethernet network, with every switch setup with a duplicate switch. Even when looking at all the primary switches, they had duplicate links, there was then also duplicated links between the primary in section A, to the duplicate in section B. So for each location that had networking, there was 8 network links. This was all back around 2007. That setup caused sooooo many issues, as many of those links were fibre. The network guys ran everything with Spanning Tree Protocol. And then we had great joy... The FOC Transceivers were slowly dieing, but in an intermittent way. And a lot of the time as they started to die, they'd drop offline for about 30 seconds... Spanning Tree Protocol was requiring 45 seconds to "rewire" the network... And by the time it was mostly finished, it had to start again as the transceiver was back online... Queue entire production network being constantly spammed with the spanning tree protocol messages...   My god I do NOT miss working in huge environments like that!
×
×
  • Create New...