Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Up until now ive been going out in the morning, setting the turbo timer to 9 minutes and letting the car warm up while I finished getting ready. I still wouldnt drive it hard when I left, but it allowed the engine temp to warm up a bit and allowed windows to de-mist if needed :blink:

I mainly notice my clutch bites really hard or isn't as smooth if I dont warm up the car first. Obviously, this is more of a case in winter, where it makes little difference in summer.

While this isn't a complete solution for warming the car up and I still drive it slowly to begin with until engine temp is right where it should be, is this actually bad for my car? Ive been doing this for over a year now almost daily. What problems would it cause if its bad?

Which all goes to prove that the engine won't warm up at idle, even after 9 minutes.

The problem is that when tye engine is cold, the ECU dumps a load of fuel in to keep the engine running. At idle, the spark plugs aren't at optimum temperature, so the spark isn't as good, and the fuel doesn't burn fully. The excess fuel washes oil from the cylinder walls, and may dilute the oil, thus reducing its lubricating ability.

You would all be aware that taxis run forever without an engine faulure. The reason is that basically the engine never gets cold. The greatest amount of damage is done to an engine while it is cold. So forget what Gillie and his old man say and do - just get in, turn on, and go.

There is another thread that discusses the pros and cons (mostly cons) of letting the engine idle to warm it up. The main point I can make here is that if you are warming up by idling, you are burning fuel but going nowhere. No wonder you have shite fuel economy!

Interesting, I've always warmed up my cars letting them idle for a few mins for a different reason. All the Auto's I've driven seem to shift smoother once the transmission oil has a bit of temperature in it. I've got a fairly expensive Auto tranny in the Pulsar so I give it a bit of respect.

  • 5 months later...

Sorry resurrect an old thread.

Although most of you say its better to start the car up leave it for a bit and then drive away not leaving it to idle in excess of 5 mins.

My question being how long do you let it idle before you take off?

Dezz stated he lets his idle for 30 seconds but does this very in different weather? eg 30 seconds for normal weather and 1 minute for cold weather?

Just an interesting topic :)

On a cold day I turn the car on and let it sit for about 2-3mins just to let the oil anf other fluids cycle then drive off boost for about 5 mins to warm everything up then you can hit boost.

Summer days I still let it sit for abit even tho the atmos temps are higher, the car still needs to warm up.

Only fluids that would warm up are your oil and water if your car is just sitting there. I have never let my car sit there idleing from a cold start for more than 30 seconds. I just jump in, turn on the engine, put on seat belt, tune in radio/cd and then start driving.

Things such as your gearbox and diff oil would still be cold, so in essence all warming up your car is the morning does is cause more wear to the engine than it should and burn petrol for no reason.

I've always just turned the key... ...Buzz the electric gate (which takes about a min to open)... ...Belt on... ...and off I go...

In winter I find that the heater will tell me when the car has warmed up... ...I turn it on and it stays on 1 fan until the system heats up and then it blasts on 4 fans... ...Usually by then I'm out onto the Hwy on my way to work...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
×
×
  • Create New...