Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have been thinking about putting a rb25/30 engine in my r33 just thinking at the moment but i would like to know what opportunities or problems this could open up to me, my r33 is only going to be a everyday streeter so i am not going to go nuts on it...yet. what do you guys think?

p.s. and my performance shop gun performance has changed phone numbers since they moved to my area, their new number is ph#0738812164

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/221447-rb2530-engine-conversion/
Share on other sites

where does one start.... :O

have a look at this part of the forum, this will answer all your questions or worries...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/RB...sions-f184.html

also look at this thread about rb30 hybrid motors and results...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...yn-t104332.html

it may also be worth just building up your rb25, as you dont have to go to a hybrid motor to make good power just ask fineline...

I personally took this option also due to wanting to make it out of an rb25, not to mention insurance and the rev'ing qualities of the rb25 vs the 30...

It a depend on your purpose of use, and what your future plans are... But have a read too...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...yno-t55845.html

rb30/25's need to be done correctly or u will end up with a pig that will be nothing but trouble. even the best 30's require constant maintenance. make sure your engine builder knows all the tricks to make it reliable.

p.s. and my performance shop gun performance has changed phone numbers since they moved to my area, their new number is ph#0738812164

I don't get this..

is this like your OWN performance shop that you run?

or is it one that you like to use and did like a radio caller and decided to chuck in a shout out to your favourite whatever shop..?

rb30/25's need to be done correctly or u will end up with a pig that will be nothing but trouble. even the best 30's require constant maintenance. make sure your engine builder knows all the tricks to make it reliable.

Another urban myth. Fortunately there are a lot of us on here with plenty of experience Michael so take a look in the new forum area for RB30 hybrids. Fortunately you can avoid the ones just telling furphies.....they never add all the problems that supposedly occur.

Send me an email if you want to talk about the conversion.

rb30/25's need to be done correctly or u will end up with a pig that will be nothing but trouble. even the best 30's require constant maintenance. make sure your engine builder knows all the tricks to make it reliable.

Got some evidence for this statement?

A mate of mine used a standard 200,000km+ rb30 bottom end, slapped it on the rb26 head and its been going great guns with tons of punishment.

Got some evidence for this statement?

A mate of mine used a standard 200,000km+ rb30 bottom end, slapped it on the rb26 head and its been going great guns with tons of punishment.

yep i am a mechanic working for a pretty well known performance workshop and have seen many of these hybrids built by other workshops become nothing but heavy breathing, oil burners. i myself have built a 25/30 hybrid and if it wasn't for me being stupid one nite it would still be running and making decent power. each to their own..

I am a little confused by the above statement!

I put a turbo on an NA RB30 that had a genuine 288 000 km on it. I tried very hard to kill it, with the stock NA computer and stock auto and stock everything else the stupid thing made 175 rwp! My wife crashed it with just over 350 000 on it, and i sold it to a bloke who cained it even harder than i ever did for about a year before he wrote off his car, he pulled the head off for inspection and it still had stock pistons and nissan head gasget... he then sold the engine.. and it got cained again..

No body had rebuilt it.. so my question is this, I cant seem to remember ever seeing a really heavy oil brething RB30, what the heck do they screw up in them to do that to them?

My father in law raced RB30's for about 7 years, and most of his 'better' engines were near on stock bottom ends! I actually lent him the turbo engine minus the turbo to finish the last race of the season after he had an oil pump fail.

So surely there are some smart guys out there that can bang a good RB30 bottem end together and mate it to an RB25 head without too much bother at all. Cos I know our family has got the skills there to do it! I have read that lots of others on this forum who have done the same. Some have not even bothered with a basic re-ring or bearing check. The humble old RB30 is a VERY strong unit.

All i know is, if i ever push my RB25 to hard and it lets go, I have a good RB30 in my shed waiting, umm I mean BEGGING for a transplant.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...yn-t104332.html

have a gwk in here!

as i stated before my rb30 was fine til i was being stupid one nite and cranked way too much timing into it which broke a stock na piston before that it made 336hp without even trying running the standard rb25 computer. i am refering to the number of rb30's i have seen personally that have required rebuilding and just ran like shit. i know there are several of them running around that are fine and making awesome power. this thread was started to find out ppls experiences with the hybrids which is wat im sharing!!!

I agree with 45ULT so here's my 2c.

Note the guys who've had no oil usage problems have "simply slapped an Rb25 or 26 head on an Rb30 block". Obvious thing here is no re-bore.

As soon as you re-bore you have heaps of decisions to make. Like piston brand, then piston to bore clearance, rings and the biggest, bore finish. Bore finish and hone is where the oil usage saga starts and engine run-in is where it ends.

A light hone on a good Rb30 block, new rings and you'll have a good engine.

Poor hone on a re-bored block and she'll be a smoker.

I won't go into the N1 oil pump dramas but my opinion is excessive crank end float.

But as I'm an old fart (with 3-Rb30 blocks in the shed) who's done way too many transplants, I'm over the whole Rb25/30 thing.

I've discovered the Aristo.

This baby comes with a 2JZtt and low K's half cuts are quite cheap. OK you're probably stuck with an auto but it's a terrific auto and a heavy duty multi plate clutch for a manual costs a lot more than an auto shift kit.

The good points:

It's 3.0L ready to go.

The 2JZ has an excellent cambelt set-up, auto tensioner unlike the bastard Nissan idea.

She has a front facing plenum.

It will have hydraulic lash adjustment, same as the Nissan. (The Supra 2JZ will have bucket and shim same as GTR)

The only bad points I've found:

2-ceramic turbos that can let go (same as Nissan) when over boosted.

Harmonic balancer needs to be replaced ASAP, then she's fine.

Manifolding is on opposite sides to Nissan which makes it tight around the brake booster.

A stock standard Aristo will surprise you at the strip, simply no fuss or noise. Up the boost slightly and they're rocket ships. On the road, stealth+

Go the 2JZ.

No doubting that the 2J is an awesome machine..

But I'll be stuffed if I'm gonna drop one into my R33,

So, I'll be building what is mechanically the same type of engine, 86mm bore/stroke, twin cam head, 4 valves per cyl.

I put a turbo om my mates 2J that is the same specs as my turbo.. and now I want to upgrade the capacity even more!

I could not agree with you more in respect to the boring and honing issues! I have screwed a hone before! smoker! But I knew i made a hack job of it, and the whole 'build' was a mad rush.

The stock compression seal of the RB30 is very good, as seen by the sheer number of VL's and R31's still hooning around. every time i start gearing up for ia build, the money is needed for something else.

But the compression seal issue is not only restricked to a hybrid. In my opinion, send your hard earned $$ to somebody like SK(or similar type of person who races and pushes the limits of the engines) who knows these things backwards and get it done right the first time. He knows the clearances he is after, what pistons to use, how much they grow, what rings to give it, head gasgets.. the whole box and dice.

If you dont know all these answers, dont just buy a bunch of parts and try to get some poor bugger to put it together and expect an awesome outcome. If you do, you might end up with an engine that cost a few grand that doesn't go and smokes all the while it isn't getting there.. might as well buy a diesel! lol

Thats my 3c worth.

and like i said, want a 3L skyline, go do it!

  • 2 weeks later...
I agree with 45ULT so here's my 2c.

Note the guys who've had no oil usage problems have "simply slapped an Rb25 or 26 head on an Rb30 block". Obvious thing here is no re-bore.

As soon as you re-bore you have heaps of decisions to make. Like piston brand, then piston to bore clearance, rings and the biggest, bore finish. Bore finish and hone is where the oil usage saga starts and engine run-in is where it ends.

A light hone on a good Rb30 block, new rings and you'll have a good engine.

Poor hone on a re-bored block and she'll be a smoker.

I won't go into the N1 oil pump dramas but my opinion is excessive crank end float.

But as I'm an old fart (with 3-Rb30 blocks in the shed) who's done way too many transplants, I'm over the whole Rb25/30 thing.

I've discovered the Aristo.

This baby comes with a 2JZtt and low K's half cuts are quite cheap. OK you're probably stuck with an auto but it's a terrific auto and a heavy duty multi plate clutch for a manual costs a lot more than an auto shift kit.

The good points:

It's 3.0L ready to go.

The 2JZ has an excellent cambelt set-up, auto tensioner unlike the bastard Nissan idea.

She has a front facing plenum.

It will have hydraulic lash adjustment, same as the Nissan. (The Supra 2JZ will have bucket and shim same as GTR)

The only bad points I've found:

2-ceramic turbos that can let go (same as Nissan) when over boosted.

Harmonic balancer needs to be replaced ASAP, then she's fine.

Manifolding is on opposite sides to Nissan which makes it tight around the brake booster.

A stock standard Aristo will surprise you at the strip, simply no fuss or noise. Up the boost slightly and they're rocket ships. On the road, stealth+

Go the 2JZ.

I am in the midst of building my RB30DET and this thread has now got me a little worried...

If there are problems with re-boring RB30 blocks, wouldn't rebuilding a RB20/25/26 (with a re-bore) produce the same symptoms/problems if the re-bore wasn't done correctly? If the ring to bore clearance isn't set up correctly or if the hone pattern on the bore is not right and then engine begins to get some blow-by and starts using oil, whats the worst case scenairo? You pull down engine and re-hone the block or ditch it and grab another block and transfer all the parts over?

Just chasing a few answers for aboce questions to help me sleep better...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this is an old thread but I have a particular attachment to the ENR34, so I don't think additional content hurts. For starters, I agree with everyone here in that the performance of a stock R34 GTR is a pretty low bar and one that you're going to spend a lot of money "matching". Now if you're willing to deviate from that template as your goal, you'll be much better off and enjoy the car much more. The engine in the NA R34s is a real kick in the nuts in terms of upgradability compared to previous generation NA cars. The NA heads on the RB2X NEOs have MUCH smaller intake port cross sections and are not compatible with any of the aftermarket forward-facing manifolds available for the RB25DET. This can be remedied with a RB25DET NEO head, but those are expensive relative to what they are. A full long-block from a turbo AWD Stagea is generally a better value and will run you about $4000 USD to get it to you. This will get you the stronger RB26DETT rods, as well. That would give you a base to build off of to be safe in the 400whp range. Not shooting for the moon, but if the stock R34 was your bar, this engine would buy you enough to be just North of stock GTR power. A forward facing manifold would allow for the easiest method toward using Bosch EV14 format injectors such as those from Injector Dynamics and FIC, to name a couple. People hate them because they're copies, but Greddy fakes can be had for around $300 USD. With what the fuel rail, regulator, injectors, and the rail adds, figure $2000 USD for the whole setup including the manifold. With the OEM brackets and a bit of trimming to the ends of the lower frame rails, the OEM intercooler mounting brackets can be used to mount an OEM GTR intercooler, or an aftermarket one made for a GTR. Those are handy vs a universale due to the angles that the end tanks have on them. Then your plumbing become super straightforward at that point despite having to cut a hole where the battery is an a matching one on the other side for the pipes. Battery can go to the trunk. I'd round up to a healthy $2000 USD here too (maybe even a tiny more) to allow for a nice aftermarket unit and some pipe fabrication. Or if you can find someone that's upgrading to something larger, the used market comes in clutch here for a decent savings. I won't even get into turbo sizing as that's something that would be for yourself to determine. HOWEVER, for the purposes of your stated goals, a Borg Warner 7064 with an internal wastegate would be a perfect spooler and would make stock GTR power easily. It would also bolt up to your OEM manifold (that would come with the DET you purchased a couple steps above) if it were ordered with a T3 flange. More with adequate fuel. If you can stick with the OEM exhaust manifold then expect to be in the whole about $6000 USD for decent turbo like the one suggested, a down pipe, new O2, and full exhaust to mate up, and upgrades to the integrated BOV in an EFR or a standalone BOV for a different turbo, as well as an aftermarket IWG (internal waste gate). Those last two are definitely optional and unnecessary. All of this stuff above does you no good without any way of tuning and or monitoring the engine. Bite the bullet on a standalone engine management solution. If your experience with wiring is limited, you're going to have to hand it off to someone else, though. Unfortunately, the adapter/patch harnesses available are typically made around the GTT which does not include AWD, and the GTR, which integrates into a lot of chassis features that aren't present in your wiring interface. So the ENR34 is the oddball. So you'll want to expand a bit on your selection and find an ECU that's capable of running the ATTESA pump also. I have a Link Thunder, but you don't need quite that much ECU to accommodate that. You WILL need someone with the know-how to tune it and code those features into whatever software it uses. And to wire it up. This will be your most significant expense. Call it $6000 USD with an ECU, an okay wiring job (no motorsport grade at this price), aftermarket triggers and R35 coils, and the time it takes to tune the ECU with added features (electronic boost control solenoid, MAP, IAT, the new triggers, and ATTESA) and don't be surprised if it's more if you want better work done. Grab a clutch made for any RB pull transmission R32/R33GTR made for the power handling capacity you're looking for. Budget $1500 USD for a new good one. That's about $20,000 USD for an engine you've upgraded yourself and had wired and tuned by someone else. That's no brakes (ENR34 brakes are pathetic), suspension (again, pathetic), or wheels and tires. So you're pretty spot on in terms of spending $30,000 USD extra on the car just to get it to perform a little better than a stock R34 GTR while looking like a bone stock ENR34 with some wheels and suspension mods. That doesn't include fluids, maintenance items, gaskets/seals, repairs needed or anything else discovered along the way. But you'll have a car you can take to the track and have fun without worrying as much about nicks and dings.  
    • Okay so, please read this. car started and ran fine. got my tuned ecu by RSenthalpy, did a bunch of pulls to test it out and finally drive the car after half a year of it just sitting and idling at most. Everything was good, thing ran flawlessly and had so much power, didn't feel slower than a Prius anymore. Parked it back and turned it off.  Next day, I install an AFR and start the car. Didn't wire anything to the ecu. Just gauge.  Car started, but died out in about a minute. I figured it was cause my car was on a lift and the fuel was really low and old. I add 5 gallons of fuel, still cranks but no start. I remove all AFR wiring (tapped into double din acc and power wires but there was a nest of wiring there so I was worried I messed something up. tried to put it back to how it was prior to afr install.) Still cranks no start. Changed spark plugs with brand new ones Changed fuel pump with a new one (verified working) Did compression test , compression came back all at 150ish. All fuses are good, Relay seemed good but ill double check by switching similar relays around. Verified MAF is working - Ended up getting curious as to why fuel pump is not priming when ignition is on, so I cut the fuel pump ground and power and connected them directly to a portable jumper. I also disconnected fuel line to fuel rail to verify fuel is being sent. So with direct jumper power, the fuel pump turns on and shot gas everywhere through the fuel pipe that I had disconnected, so ny doing that, I verified no clogs in fuel lines or filter. - Tried starting the car with that jumper directly wired to power and ground, but car still did not start. I'm guessing its a CAS issue but im a little scared to check it without messing up timing or anything else since I actually dont understand how to check CAS lol. If anyone has any other suggestions or recommendations , please let me know.
    • Hi all. I am aware there is lots of discussions about jacking points, where to lift the car and what not. But as usual just a lot of "in my opinion" and nothing definitive, and everyone does it in a different way. I want to hear from some experienced people on which points on the car it's okay/safe/recommended to lift the car using a four point hoist/lift. I will attach some images of my underbody. Sills are largely okayish, the driver side jacking point is pretty mangled though and it looks like the underfloor is slightly pushed in too, but I might be wrong. In the German Skyline forum, the consensus is to use the sidemember chassis rails in the front and the rear subframe? bushing in the rear. I know the manual says to never use the sidemember for loading but lots of folk do it and it was definitely done on my car too as they are slightly bent too. Based on the images, what points do I use to not make the already present damage worse? I'd use wood or rubber blocks to spread the load across a bigger area of course. Driver side sidemember and jacking point mangled one) https://imgur.com/a/eKjzrJX Driver side rear jacking point https://imgur.com/a/W3DWF1P Passenger side sidemember and jacking point https://imgur.com/a/65UvIJe Passenger side rear jacking point https://imgur.com/a/h3k7j53 We can also see some underbody rust but so far it all looks somewhat treatable and nothing that requires a Yoshida style restoration.
    • Have you put an aftermarket oil pressure gauge on and verified your oil pressure?   Noise being on the block, on exhaust side, how high up the block does it seem to be? It could be the VCT system getting cranky, especially if it's mainly at idle, and when warm, as that'll be your lowest point for oil pressure. Could be showing that oil passages / VCT solenoid are blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...