Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This thread probably should be more about people's general thoughts and things rather than any specific organisation though.

Any further suggestions ppl want to put forward??

$30 seems a good figure? that extra $10 multiplied by say 50 members is an extra $500 for the initital formation.

I'd definitely pay $30 for an initial club membership....

Id like an official sau wet t shirt contest :thumbsup:

No seriously....I think there should be 2 basic membership structures- a social one which entitles you to ricey stickers and the priviledge of coming to meets/cruises, and an track membership which has the full on CAMS stuff....right now Id be up for just a social membership, but when I get a track worthy car at the end of the year Ill be up for the track membership

everyones say counts it doesnt matter if ur new or not... the thoughts of those that are just coming here are probably just as, if not more important than the regulars.

welcome.

i will gegt full but i dstill think we need a social membership for the 'post whores' who dont ownsick cars (ie. darky) dso then they can come bowling etc bnut i think the social side of things should be handled by the general people and not the 'admins' dso to speak

I vote for the full membership with the CAMS affiliation etc. The rtack day is a great option to have even if we only do it a couple of times a year. I like the idea of BBQs etc. after a cruise so as we can all get together and chat and get to know each other. I'm also willing to help out where ever possible.

Alan

I like the idea of both social and full.

Have the 2 options gives people the choice of wether or not they want to go out and do stuff, of use the club as a source of information for everything skyline related.

I started off coming here to find out more about skylines, but after a while i went on cruises and put faces to names.

Basically, I enjoy the cruises and attend when I can... the forums are excellent and I've been dieing for a track day!

I understand that there will be people that aren't in the same position as me, but CAMS affiliation would be great (though I understand costly).

I've never really givin it any thought until now... but this something that really needs looked into!

Although selling my skyline and buy a Civic with NEONS does sound appealing...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It’s not driver training though, it’s just an online questionnaire and $65 
    • Almost certainly no. In Vic they have this crazily restrictive set of rules for mods that is usually interpreted as "no more than 2 modifications to the intake system". And they're not real hot on upgraded turbos at all, let alone high mounts. That means if you fit a bigger (particularly front mount) intercooler (which is, of course, almost impossible to go without) then you're already down to one other mod allowed. You'll really benefit from hearing from someone from Vic who knows the real state of play. Even better, speak to an automotive mods certifying engineer from Vic. You can actually read the rules from the govco websites yourself, too.
    • Well, I'm not clicking on a link to f**king bookface (never have, never will), so I can't really know what the complaint here is about, but.... There's nothing particularly wrong with forcing people to have a higher license category to drive super/hypercars. Note that the laws are not about modified cars - only listed standard cars, because there are not supposed to be cars modified enough to meet the law's category limits anyway. If you have a modified car that falls into those power limits you're already in trouble anyway. What is wrong is the bullshit on-line "test" to get the upgrade, instead of any actual work and training.
    • Meh Don't have Facebook anymore but watched a YouTube about it, they also talked about them not being able to use and "sports" modes, not really sure how they would enforce that apart from logging the Db for the cars that have exhaust valve activation in sports mode Apart from all the high end sports cars and supercars that make the sort of power they are talking about standard, I cannot see it bothering anyone else, unless of course road side tests now include having a dyno and scales on site to test the power output vs weight What is it? 500hp per ton? And if the only additional cost is $60 or so, as the video stated, I cannot see that being a war stopper for the people that outlay a few hundred thousand dollars on a performance car In fact, I see it would be a ego boost for some, because they have a "special" drivers licence for a "special"person with a "special" car And if I did have a modified car that made over the limit, there's no way in hell I would apply for a "special" licence, I could see the authorities checking your licence against your rego, so if old mate applied for a licence, but owns a, say, R33 Skyline, that may trigger an inspection of said car as to why, and how, that old mate has a R33 that would fit the bill of making over 500hp per ton Again, meh, not something I believe will be a real issue to 99.9% of people
    • https://www.facebook.com/groups/mechanic.com.au/permalink/2029367984190485/?   Here we go…. 😢
×
×
  • Create New...