Jump to content
SAU Community

Small Fun Car Recommendation


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If it was me,i would be trying to get my hands on a micra.

I have a micra for my run-around and i can not fault it, Cheap to run, parts are cheap, Tyres are cheap and im running TOYO R888, you can do all the aftermarket stuff yourself, Big brand parts availiable for these cars as they are fairly popular in Japan, mine weighs somewhere around 780 KG or less so its definatley good through the twisties.

You can really give these cars a hard time and they take it.

In the future you can turbo it and get really good power to weight figures or do a CA/SR engine swap.

If i didnt have the micra as a run-around i would be getting something of the VTEC variety B16A, B18C, H22A, you can find many VTEC conversion honda civics, intergra's on car sales for under 10K, and theres always plenty of desent 2nd hand quality parts availiable for honda's.

Anyway heres some pics of my micra

post-43077-1212533524_thumb.jpg post-43077-1212533606_thumb.jpg

post-43077-1212533948_thumb.jpg

and another tuff micra for some inspiration

post-43077-1212533647_thumb.jpg post-43077-1212533663_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honda CRX - 2nd Generation.

Extremely zippy, use bugger all fuel, cheap insurance, and fantastic handlers! I won't even mention how easy they are to park and get around in. They even have HUGE carrying capacity.

Forget the age of the vehicle - it's the CONDITION that important. Most R32's are a couple of decades old now, yet that doesn't automatically mean they're all hunks of junk. Quite the opposite can be true if the car has been looked after.

I bought a second generation CRX as an 'in-betweener' to getting my current R32 GTR and I still LOVE jumping back into it regularly and taking it for a spin!!!

Looks like I'm not the only one that supports a Honda Coupe as a 'daily driver' to interchange with a GTR

Sure, it's a FWD but for 10 grand, the '95 Prelude VTi-R has

i) an engine you can't kill

ii) 4WS with cornering that brings smiles to your face

iii) great road manners & good braking

iv) more power than an MX5 with 143Kw (161Kw with chip)

v) good fuel efficiency up to V-Tec cut-in

vi) accepts E10 without pinging

vii) sun-roof

Yeh it's a car that costed $53K new and great value now if services are all done

Honda suspension bushes last as well as GTRs

I can jump in and out of those 2 cars I have on the left hand side and enjoy the ride every time.

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like I'm not the only one that supports a Honda Coupe as a 'daily driver' to interchange with a GTR

Sure, it's a FWD but for 10 grand, the '95 Prelude VTi-R has

i) an engine you can't kill

ii) 4WS with cornering that brings smiles to your face

iii) great road manners & good braking

iv) more power than an MX5 with 143Kw (161Kw with chip)

v) good fuel efficiency up to V-Tec cut-in

vi) accepts E10 without pinging

vii) sun-roof

Yeh it's a car that costed $53K new and great value now if services are all done

Honda suspension bushes last as well as GTRs

I can jump in and out of those 2 cars I have on the left hand side and enjoy the ride every time.

Cheers

Poor resale (high depreciation), compared to mx5

Harder to re-sell

High cost of parts and servicing

Lots of stuff to go bang (less inviting for the average backyard mech)

It's a FWD

too heavy

Less fuel efficient

There's not many cars that eats twisties like the mx5 if setup correctly.

I like other peoples Honda's but when I weigh up their pro's and con's for myself I always end up walking away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As someone who has been playing with turbo things for some time now, be prepared for this to not be the first time feeling this way    I'm busy as atm, but if no one else covers the things I'm realising are worth mentioning to you then I will when I have a chance as it seems like I overestimated your knowledge on how turbos and wastegates work.  Otherwise I recommend having a look around how wastegates and boost control work, really anything on understanding the general mechanism of boost control as it will help you find the answers to the questions you're looking for.  Your initial question jumps some fundamentals.
    • I don't understand anything anymore.
    • so this is an anomaly??? I thought it was a voluntary increase
    • we can only guess exactly what happened from our keyboards, but to me it looks like they were targeting 27 but the wastegate was too small or poorly controlled and the boost crept up, that is quite common
    • Good points!  Took those for granted - though I *did* actually give an example of winding boost up more than it had been before where I wasn't actually specifically looking for more peak power.  The Toyota Starlet dyno plot that I shared and mentioned showed an overlay from the previous tune it had and the one I'd redone, I left the boost targetting the same as the old tune but then after peak power I ramped boost up by a good 5psi or so over what the old tune had at the same rpm. The reason I felt comfortable with this (though the owner of the car had a "are you sure?" moment when I suggested it) is that the setup wasn't turbo limited, it was largely head sealing limited and the owner was a bit concerned as for the last few seasons he'd had issues with head lifting - sometimes not completing an event without having some headgasket issue, so he didn't want to run any more boost than it was. The reasons I was ok with raising the boost a good 5+psi MORE than that was that I left it where it was in the middle, and only increased it where VE (and therefore cylinder pressure vs psi) were dropping hard and I didn't stop the torque from dropping, just reduced the drop.  Well, there is that and the fact that the previous tuner had it overtimed by near 7degrees at peak torque - but that's another story haha.    I didn't really go into detail about that "turning it up more" thing but now you've mentioned the "not detuning", sometimes the boost *can* be turned up higher than you'd expect if the setup allows for it and you do it smartly.  I've tuned things to run 30psi on BP98 "safely" that a few years ago (or still?) people would cry that it was a stupid idea - but given they were well intercooled, low EMAP turbos and only doing that kind of boost where VE is dropping etc I was pretty confident it wasn't as cowboy as it sounded at face value and we never ended up with issues as a result of it.     
×
×
  • Create New...