Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

shit be interested in seeing how the block went as when mine blew it cracked big time . mine had 255awk but a bad night and a massive boost spike due to a waste gate line comming addrift . all ended broke 2 ringlands and cracked 2 other pistons as well as the block cracking so sad .

I have only cracked 1 piston, no 6, had the plugs out today, a little camera down, and there was oil on top of piston no. 6.

I don't want to repair this engine, i found a new one today, and i start tomorrow changing, hopefully i am on the road again 6-8 hours later.

( thats the great thing, when i don't have to change anything insite, only intake and turbomanifold.)

Stroker kit! you get to keep the same eng#, so you shouldn't have any issues with your local laws either... :(

Where can i get that i AUS.!!

Or better, a m8 downunder, find me a RB30 engine, i will pay him before he buy it, and the shipping costs aswell, and send to my adress in Denmark.

Edited by Stagea Denmark

Easily done :( The stroker kits come from JUN, TOMEI, HKS etc... you can find them on most importer websites: www.importmonster.com.au, www.japanpartsdirect.com.au, www.nengun.com etc... As far as RB30 is concerned, that's not a hugely difficult job: if you want one, we'll find one for you...

Easily done :) The stroker kits come from JUN, TOMEI, HKS etc... you can find them on most importer websites: www.importmonster.com.au, www.japanpartsdirect.com.au, www.nengun.com etc... As far as RB30 is concerned, that's not a hugely difficult job: if you want one, we'll find one for you...

:wacko::):D Thanks mate, that's makes me happy, and thanks for all the URL.

Goal for the new white Stagea, RB30 engine, and big hp, money is no problem.

today i pull out my old engine, stripped the new one, put my old plenum and turbo-kit on the new engine, i only missed the flywheel and clutch, and tomorrow morning (Now it midnight i DK), a new engine is ready to boost and run. (I took a lot of pictures, they will be here tomorrow.) I also took the top of the old engine, and thats bad, some of the aluminium from the piston number six, is sitting on the cylinder-wall, i also have pictures of that.

Edited by Stagea Denmark

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...