Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Have you tried having the knock sensors on a switch, so they can be off when its warming up, and then turn them on once its warm. I believe it wouldn't change your power output, as its your other tricks that are giving oyu the power. As SK said this is merely fooling the ecu into believing there is no knock, so if there is no knock, in theory there should be the same outcome.

Yep thought about doin that but the switch bounce 'may' be detected as knock by the ECU....

And yep..that is all i am doing..fooling the ECU...

pitty its not a subaru. in them if there is a knock sensor fault it pulls back timing 10 degrees while under any load..... lol

Nice one...The first post already says that any knock sensor fault (open/closed circuit) activates ignition retard...

I would say every single ECU with knock sensor capability would do this...

Interesting.............I have a a question though. If excessive airflow on its own doesn't activate R&R why do I see rich A/F ratios and retarded timing on the dyno even when there is zero knock? The Stagea suffers from this on cold days. I run 100 ron fuel (Shell V Power Racing) with the SITC retarding the ignition and so there is no knock that I can detect, but the A/F ratios drop from high 11's down to low 9's and the ignition retards 10 to 15 degrees. Maybe the ignition cut can explain the richer A/F ratios due to the resulting unburnt fuel, but it doesn't account for the retarded ignition. The R&R isn't as severe as when there is knock, but it's still there.

Cheers

Gary

To be honest with my car on the Dyno we didn't see excessively low AFRs but I have heard of it happening...not sure about the ignition advance though...I have the Nissan consult datafiles so I will check...

IMO there is another function in the ecu which detects excessive AFM voltage rise rate, and also exhibits similar traits to R&R, which is what results in the sawtooth power graph you see when you turn the boost up on a stock ecu.

I am running a GT30R which obviously is laggier than stock turbo...so the afm voltage rise rate would be lower at say 2000-3000rpm than with a stock turbo...Maybe the ECU monitors afm v rise rate but only in the low rpm ranges...

If you just disconnect the knock sensors the ECU gives error code 55. When ever this happens the ECU reverts instantly to R&R anyway...Also if you ground the Knock sensor signal wire it also goes to error code 55 which again reverts to R&R mode...(maybe a few people reconnecting their knock sensors about now)...

you sure its 55? 55 is the error code for 'there is no error'. 34 is knock sensor afaik.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And at over $2 per litre I'm starting to consider setting up a corn mash still and converting over to alcohol and running mine on it !  Up side of that is it all doesn't have to go into the car ! Win win !
    • H2 (for cars) will never happen. It's not reasonable for any number of reasons. It's also not reasonable for almost all of the industrial uses that the fanbois say that it will be used for, again for a large number of reasons. There are some cases where it will be good. But, even those will be massively hampered by the economics. The only way that H2 can be economic is if we somehow manage to get from where we are to the other side of the economic-valley-of-death in which no-one can operate. You need there to be sufficient renewable generated electricity to be available so that it is effectively free. Once you are there, you can do whatever the hell you want and hang the efficiency. But until you get there, the ever diminishing value of electricity makes it harder and harder to encourage businesses to build the new generation capacity, and they will simply stop investing in generation projects. (I kinda think there needs to be just government money spent on building the required capacity in a non-commercial way, similar to how the first fossil fueled grids were built, as national-government owned utilities. And probably some nuclear in there to start. But this all should have started 10-15 years ago to avoid the chasm of death that we face right now). Synth fuels will be much more likely, but will only occur is there is at least some renewable H2 production, because you need H2 to do it. And you need stacks of free (or at least extraordinarily cheap) energy because assembling molecules back into fuels is exactly the opposite process to burning the fuel, and the reason we burn fuels is because there is so much energy squeezed into each molecule. So you're somewhat subject to the same economic valley of death problem as above anyway. That is unless people are willing to pay the current equivalent of $5 or $6 per litre of petrol-ish liquid fuels. Can you imagine it? The squealing at $2 now is bad enough.
    • This is so cool. Get a dashcam that records audio and hopefully you'll catch it.  Maybe there's a brand or some kind of markings on the back ? Are the pics hand drawn? I love it so much.
    • Hahaha yep, point(s) taken. I just like seeing different things and an EV in an R32 is pretty different. I'm not on the EV band wagon, I'm waiting for synthetic fuels or hydrogen personally. 
×
×
  • Create New...