Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm sorry but, 'feeling the difference' in top end?

Unless the tune was rooted before I can assure you that not only is there no power difference but, also this 'feeling' is peculiar only to cars that started out with a spark issue or were seriously 'under-gapped' for the density of the air/fuel mixture.

Smashing more power/rpm/boost into a motor and gapping down on the exsisting heat range is tuning 101( for all cars). If you get no joy in the top end after gapping down on the exsisting heat range you go to a colder plug etc.

For example, for most of the NA V8's I've tuned you can just about go off a rule of thumb that is gap down 4 thou for every 50hp added.

I've been doing this to alot of different cars over the years so 'luck' has nothing to do with it. :thumbsup:

There are some serious horsepower GTST's & GTR's running around with factory coils as well. Splitfires do one thing well and thats make a cheap replacement for the expensive factory coils when they are shagged. :D

You have some strong convictions there...you can keep em. I don't use stop gaps unless necessary.

As I said "hey if 8 is your lucky number.... who am I to say different"

My car runs good on .8 and runs much better on 1.1, regardless of how it's tuned, I get more out of 1.1, the engine has been re-built and has never had stock coils on it.

The car had stock coils when I bought it...they were fine

Gapping down on stockers is done to adjust for the standard tune on 98ron...nothing to do with coils.

But hey :cheers: thanks for the beer.

You have some strong convictions there...you can keep em. I don't use stop gaps unless necessary.

As I said "hey if 8 is your lucky number.... who am I to say different"

My car runs good on .8 and runs much better on 1.1, regardless of how it's tuned, I get more out of 1.1, the engine has been re-built and has never had stock coils on it.

The car had stock coils when I bought it...they were fine

Gapping down on stockers is done to adjust for the standard tune on 98ron...nothing to do with coils.

But hey :D thanks for the beer.

I don't use stop gaps either. I think you may not understand plug gapping in terms of how it fits in with a tune.

To clarify, I had suggested that 0.8mm is better suited to higher power/boost/rpm than 1.1mm on the same heat range of plug. I haven't suggested that you gap down to 0.8mm for the sake of it.

Nor have I said 0.8mm is the only gap I run. I have tried to give some insight into plug gapping by indicating when we go closing the gap a bit and why(not very well explained so far I guess)

When you decide to slap another 100hp into your motor you can re-test your 1.1mm theory 'if thats your lucky number' (our 'in joke'). You will find that due to the much higher charge density that equals the extra 100hp you will have a missfire that is simply fixed by re-gapping, or in the case of exceeding the heat range of the plug going to a colder plug.

So you aren't mislead; Gapping down is 'not' done to adjust for the standard tune on 98ron. It is only required when people up the boost/power (charge density).

As a side note the irridium and platinum varieties of plugs with thier smaller electrode allow for a 'longer' spark shape and tollerate a slightly wider gap. Makes sense as some of the Autolite plugs I used to use in my V8 days had smaller electrodes and seemed to go the same way.

Hope that explains a little better the plug gap rationale. :thumbsup:

Actually maybe someone can look up the theory of spark plugs and post it up. Proving me wrong is always good fun and I get to learn something new too :cheers:

Edited by rev210

Gapping (from my own experiences and not agreeing or dis-agreeing with anyone else) is for weaker or less able coil packs in cars.

When I have my POS 180sx, it was fine on 1.1mm plugs for a good 12 months, but then started mis-firing and causing problems.

After new plugs, and gapping to 0.9mm it was fine for a further 6 months before it went rough again, so took the plugs out and re-gapped to 0.8mm and it was again fine. Got 4 new coil packs, gapped the plugs back to 1.1mm and it was running perfectly fine again until I sold it.

If your ignition system can sustain the larger gap, I would be using it, as a larger gap usually = a hotter spark, which means better ignition of the air/fuel mixture.

Then you have other things to consider, such as ECU, tune, fuel type, etc but in it's most simplest form, the larger the gap, the hotter the spark, and the cleanest burn you can get.

B.

I do use the iridiums Rev...that could be the difference. Next time I'm stuffing around I'll try some coppers @ 1.1 and see.

Engine pulled 274kw when fresh, I'd like to try another 100hp and see how I go, but those extra hp will be costly :thumbsup:

I understand exactly your methodology, but as I said I don't like to go about it that way if at all possible..If it can't be done in timing/tune, then yeah sure no problems. My ute, 289 windsor I run gapped down plugs to avoid pinging on u/l, because the mechanical dizzy won't allow enough advance to get her running right, when I change that over to a remapped electronic setup it'll be gapped to normal again. As it should be.

I know I do seem a tad pedantic on this shit..sorry and in no way am i saying the way you do yours is wrong, because I know it works fine that way also, I just prefer the other method.

p.s

8 is a lucky number :D

I think there is also 1 last thing that I should have clarified. A stronger spark from a boosted up CDI or in the old school NA V8s an MSD setup/magneto allows for a larger plug gap relative to a weaker coil system or on the skyline where the factory coils are on the way out. You still need to gap down as charge pressure increases regardless, although your starting point may begin higher. 7 is my lucky number. :cheers:

Running the same plugs, same coil packs, I went from a stock RB25DET to an RB25/30DET with a T04R off the side... Still running at 1.1mm gap with out an issue, and currently enough grunt to have 3rd gear spinning hard before I even hit full torque...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 1.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 馃槂  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
  • Create New...