Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all i have just been researching oil restiction for this build. i have taken the following info from the major thread. info was provided by gary (sydney kid) and can be found on page 153. here it is again. hope this helps some ppl

RB26 cylinder head= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 1.5 mm restrictor in the other

Plenty of oil flow to the camshaft bearings, not too much oil slopping around in the head, getting chucked into the catch can and leaving the sump in short supply.

RB25 with VVT= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

Plus 1 feed to the VVT actuator

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 1.5 mm restrictor in the other

Plus leave the VVT oil feed as per standard

Plenty of oil flow to the camshaft bearings and VVT actuator but not too much oil slopping around in the head, getting chucked into the catch can and leaving the sump in short supply.

RB25 without VVT= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

Plus 1 feed to the VVT actuator

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 2.0 mm restrictor in the other

Plus block off the VVT oil feed

and a couple of diagrams

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...st&id=26521

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...st&id=26522

the only question i still have that i have not been able to find an answer to is,

does it matter which gallery you restrict and which you block off??

dan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/
Share on other sites

hey all i have just been researching oil restiction for this build. i have taken the following info from the major thread. info was provided by gary (sydney kid) and can be found on page 153. here it is again. hope this helps some ppl

RB26 cylinder head= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 1.5 mm restrictor in the other

Plenty of oil flow to the camshaft bearings, not too much oil slopping around in the head, getting chucked into the catch can and leaving the sump in short supply.

RB25 with VVT= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

Plus 1 feed to the VVT actuator

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 1.5 mm restrictor in the other

Plus leave the VVT oil feed as per standard

Plenty of oil flow to the camshaft bearings and VVT actuator but not too much oil slopping around in the head, getting chucked into the catch can and leaving the sump in short supply.

RB25 without VVT= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

Plus 1 feed to the VVT actuator

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 2.0 mm restrictor in the other

Plus block off the VVT oil feed

and a couple of diagrams

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...st&id=26521

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...st&id=26522

the only question i still have that i have not been able to find an answer to is,

does it matter which gallery you restrict and which you block off??

dan

I thought I was quite specific when I posted "same as RB26's are standard" ie; the front one

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-3932093
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
RB25 without VVT= 2 oil feed galleries between the block and the head

Plus 1 feed to the VVT actuator

We block one off, same as RB26's are standard

We use a 2.0 mm restrictor in the other

Plus block off the VVT oil feed

I ran with a single 1.5mm up front and blocked rear as suggested in the thread.

The setup seems ok and has travelled quite a few kms but from day one I was getting a little valve train noise for a fraction of a second following start up of which was not there prior.

If I were to do it again I'd probably go with leaving the std RB30 1.8mm restrictor up front.

All though I possibly believe the valve train noise was as a result of the head bloke not knowing what he was doing with the lifters as a result they trapped a little air inside.

So as they so do it right do it yourself. I've pulled the lifters apart; meticulously cleaned, primed and reassembled.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-3982794
Share on other sites

Im using th 25de (vvt). Ive been told i have two main options, one is to block the rear gallery all together but was told it can starve one end of the head during start up. Which isnt much of a trouble as it disappears once oil pressure is up but id rather go with the other option to just restrict both galleries using the tomei restrictors. Anyone else gone 4 this option?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-3994028
Share on other sites

Im using th 25de (vvt). Ive been told i have two main options, one is to block the rear gallery all together but was told it can starve one end of the head during start up. Which isnt much of a trouble as it disappears once oil pressure is up but id rather go with the other option to just restrict both galleries using the tomei restrictors. Anyone else gone 4 this option?

Block the middle and use the front feed (the VCT one) and then restrict the rear feed according to the table.

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4001986
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I posted about this before ages ago....you can use copper mig tips...just find the size that has the correct hole diameter you want and machine it down or cut it down to suit. Pretty sure most std mig tips are around a 1/4" OD.....actually i cant recall now...maybe it was about 7mm or 5/16"...either way it works :starwars:

Edited by r33_racer
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4062777
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

I am going to be using an RB25DE head without VVT.

Could I block the rear feed and use the RB30 1.8mm front restrictor without filling the catch can with too much blow by?

Car will be used for daily duties, towing & the odd 1/4 run

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4116336
Share on other sites

You could and it would be fine.

However at this point in time, if I were to do it again I would restrict both down to 1.5mm and run a nice catch can setup that drains to the sump.

The drain to the sump also works to vent the bottom end as a result the oil is able to flow from the head back to the bottom end considerably easier.

All though mine has had no issues the top end is noticeably noisier since performing the oil restriction mod on first start up when cold.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4116417
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

If the cold start-up noise is somehow related to the elimination of the rear feed, I can see the logic in retaining both feeds.

Here's a variation on the theme, using the idea that a single 1.5mm restrictor otherwise supplies enough volume during operation:

MIG tips are available with a 1.2mm orifice. Cross sectional area - 1.13 sq.mm

SK's preference of 1.5mm restrictor provides cross sectional area of 1.77 sq.mm

Install 1.2mm restrictor front and rear gives ~ 2.25 sq.mm so slightly more flow than 1 x 1.5 but way less than 2 x 1.8 or 2.0mm as stock. Similar end result and maybe avoid the issues Cubes identified.

Could be wide of the mark and solely related to hydraulic lifters but worth raising.

Comments?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4167913
Share on other sites

Dale would the flow be reduced further again due to increased friction losses as a result of the smaller hole? In other words the cross sectional area is not 'directly' related to flow? i.e 2 sq.mm would not flow 2x that 1 sq.mm?

I have NFI when it comes to this but visualising flow through a smaller pipe suggests so.

A friend fitted 2 x 1.1's to his and it tapped its arse off. :S

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4168291
Share on other sites

I also have little idea of fluid dynamics, but the restrictor is just that - an orifice rather than a tube. So restriction would be causing the reduction in flow rather than friction I would think.

All the same I don't want too much in-depth analysis but threw up the idea given your start up noise. If it is lifter noise only then maybe not a problem. I've heard from more than one source that using a 10W60 oil is an important part of the equation of making this setup work optimally.

Interesting to hear that your mate with 2 x 1.1 restrictors had problems with noisy lifters.

So at the least it appears to be important to stick with SK's guide and go 1 x 1.5mm and a bung in the rear?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4168655
Share on other sites

Well... 10w60 next oil change it is then.

I'll let you know how it goes. :/

I should mention nothings broke with a little bit of noise on start up. Its now been a year since the turbo and restrictors have gone in and travelled a good 25k. There was no real wear on the lifters etc when I pulled them out recently to drop in a new set of cams.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4168676
Share on other sites

Sticking with the general theme of the thread, who can share experiences regarding oil pump spec and restrictor sizes regarding lifter bleed out? Clearly this relates to 30/25 with a non-Neo head.

I'd presume very few of us would be running dedicated track cars with this setup, so quiet/smooth operation is still high on the list of priorities. ie. I want to avoid bleed out due to too much reduction in oil delivery to the top end.

My setup is

25DE oil pump (stock)

non VVT head

internal oil drain-backs in head + block drilled oversize to 9.5mm

restrictors 1.6mm (F) 1.2mm ®

and (hopefully) catch can with drain-to-sump

engine speed < 7000rpm

application: road, motorkhana, club sprint

Edited by Dale FZ1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222706-oil-restriction/#findComment-4181500
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • pffft! My alignments are starting to take 3-4 weeks each. Bugger overnight - that would be a dream! Overnight is when I leave it on stands with the rear suspension in pieces, hoping I can remember where I was at when I come back to it. I have to set the car up on a level surface so I can get decent camber measurements, then try to set the RUCAs to the right length to get that right. Then I have to put the car somewhere else where I have enough room to set up the bumpsteer gauge (laser, paper, mirror), so I can dial out that. Then I need to go measure camber again because changing the tension arm length affects that also. Then I need to measure toe, and I can't do that to my own satisfaction at home, so I have to put it on an actual aligner. Then I have to go back and fix the camber again, and if that took more than a half a turn, decide if I want to set up the bumpsteer measurements again. I previously had the bumpsteer almost completely banished and then I started changing things again! And that's only the rear end. Not even gotten to talking about the front yet. And this has been going on in the context of me discovering a seized bolt in the LHR FUCA bush at the upright, hence needing total disassembly to replace that bush and the others that were not far away from the same outcome, replacing sphericals in the front end and making a mistake that resulted in needing to do it again, which is only half done right now. It's a selfmade nightmare. Only have self to blame, etc etc. But regardless, I am so complelely unable to utilise the services of a normal wheel aligner that I have no choice. I haven't found a shop in my city that does "race" alignments - and by that I don't mean I want my car to be set up for racing, but the set of adjustments that I have available and that need to be used to do the alignment are the same as you'd find on a race car. I haven't looked everywhere, but there doesn't appear to be the equivalent of the motorsport focused shops that are present in Sydney and Melbourne. And such an alignment would cost $300, and you only want to do it once in a while, and you don't want to find out that you have to replace bushes and bearings and such while you are spending that $300 so you have to come back and spend it again a week later. So I stay living in my self made nightmare for the moment.  
    • Well, yeah, obviously. But then you have a turbo with 270kW "design", meaning it will have the higher boost threshold and lag of a bigger turbo, but only doing the work of a smaller turbo. That's the suck. That's actually exactly where I am right now, because my stocker exploded and I got Tao to do a highflow for me. I got a low pressure actuator on it and don't push it past ~10 psi or so, where the stocker was being run at ~12 psi. it makes a little more power than the stocker did, but it lags like a bitch. But, if I run any more boost it starts to ping and the ECU goes into panic mode, which cuts all the fun, so it clearly needs to be tuned. But, until such time as I (which is not I, it's my bro-in-law) can actually get the dyno working again, and get some injectors, and do all the swap over of those and the R35 AFM, I can't attempt to use the turbo the way it really deserves to. So what I have now is something that drives worse than what it did before it filled the cat with little pieces of turbine. I will tune it eventually, and probably only push it up to ~250-270 rwkW, which is pretty close to the max for that highflow anyway. I would imagine that by getting the tune right, and with newer betterrer injectors, we can probably make the boost come on a little earlier than it does now.** And if I do not think that the top end reward is worth the low end sacrifice, I will sell it off and convert to a G30, because the smaller ones of those come on boost very nicely on a 25 and make more power than I realistically need or want. The only reason I didn't do it at the time the turbo blew up is that I wasn't ready to sink a lot of money into an Artec manifold, reverse rotation turbo, the AFM and injector upgrade that would have been immediately compulsory, and the dyno was being problematic.*** It was easier and faster to just put the highflow on. And then, as I mentioned in an earlier post, even that is not "easy", because Tao's highflows use a shorter core than the Hitachi, so the compressor housing moves backwards in the bay, necessitating that all of the pipework had to get modded. ** And maybe just maybe, check the valve clearances and put new shims through, because I have recently seen firsthand on another motor that sloppy clearances on the shims can cost a lot of effective timing and lift and really slow an engine down. 3S-GTE in a Caldina got new shims, closing the clearances from just above the max to right down near the minimum, and it is a massively different car to drive. On boost the better part of 1000 rpm earlier!
    • ooooooh so this is where they get posted  Was at a wedding that day anyway, but the next one I will be there for SURE.
    • @PranK, why do we have this restriction? Because photos are the first thing that gets asked of new people on the forums. Do the spam bots post photos if allowed?
    • How do you rate the clutch @joshuaho96? Sometimes I wonder whether it's genuinely very driveable or whether I just feel that way because it cost a good chunk of money. Most recently when seeing the guy at the tyre shop struggle to move the car...
×
×
  • Create New...