Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This might seem like a stupid question, but what is this for?

I'm kinda new to the skyline community/skylines, but i'm interested in whatever it is you do, and what you would need a banner for :)

It's for events such as Marque in the park and the show at Old Parliament House, so that people know who we are. We quite often out number the clubs that are running the show (like the Ford club that holds Marque in the park) and it can maybe help get more numbers and attention for other things.

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

One thing to think about as well, what will the banner say? Since we aren't a club per say, will it only be SAU? or will we put SAU NSW on it? since they are incorporated?

It says SAU and skylinesaustralia.com Even SAU NSW don't have NSW on their banner.

One thing to think about as well, what will the banner say? Since we aren't a club per say, will it only be SAU? or will we put SAU NSW on it? since they are incorporated?

We can put ACT on it, or just have Skylines Australia, or whatever we want really, it doesn't matter.... we're still a social group on this forum..... "official" or not and trust me, no one is going to care or tell us off for doing it :thumbsup:

Looks good.

My 2c

I think the car is a little over powering, perhaps it could be slightly smaller and I think that the text nees to be more prominent. Maybe have it right across the top or bottom.

Cheers

Stephen

It's not my favourite, but if we're to use it, I'd also suggest a smaller rear wing, the one on it looks too ricer like to me, not a good image for the club to project. Not that it looks bad.

It's not my favourite, but if we're to use it, I'd also suggest a smaller rear wing, the one on it looks too ricer like to me, not a good image for the club to project. Not that it looks bad.

OK I actually agree with this, but others don't.

Mick, can you do up two pics for a final vote (anyone not put forward their ideas by now, tough). Both pics to have enlarged words with one the current R34 and the other a stock R34 GTR, both with the same profile.

Mick you can put his initials has designer on the banner if you want :-)

Working on it... :rofl:

I need a high res photo of the rear quarter of an R34 GTR (preferably bayside blue) that isnt copyrighted.

If anyone has one that we can use for the banner please post it here.

OK I actually agree with this, but others don't.

Mick, can you do up two pics for a final vote (anyone not put forward their ideas by now, tough). Both pics to have enlarged words with one the current R34 and the other a stock R34 GTR, both with the same profile.

Mick you can put his initials has designer on the banner if you want :-)

I like the GTR Idea a little more, Most of us love the look of the stock car's (or gts-t's with GTR body kits :) )

I still need a picture of a GTR (un copyrighted)... C'mon people.

If we want a banner more than a handful of us need to comtribute. ;)

I'll need an E-Mail address to send my photos to you.

Taken with a Pansonic FZ7 with a Leica lens - Hi Res I think

Regards,

Terry

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I used to hate R31s, and any of the other Nissans that led up to it, and any of the Toyotas with similar styling, because of the boxiness. They were, and remain, childish, simplistic, and generally awful. I appreciate R31s a lot more now, but only the JDM 2 door. The ADM 4 door (and any other 4 door, even if they are unique compared to our local one) can eat a bowl of dicks. The Aussie R31 is also forever tarnished by their association with stereotypical bong clutching Aussie R31 owners of the 90s and early 2000s. I think the Nissans of the 70s (other than 120Y/180B/200B) are far superior looking to the 80s cars. The 240K era Skylines are boss. The same is broadly true of Toyotas. Hondas don't ever register in my thinking, from any era. Mitsus are all horrid shitboxen in any era, and so also don't register. Subarus are always awful, ditto. Daihatsus and Suzukis also don't generally register. They are all invisible. I think the SW20 MR2 looks fiddly. The 3000GT/GTO is like that but way worse. Too many silly plastic barnacles and fiddly gimmicks ruined what could have been a really nice base shape. Kinda-sorta looks like a big heavy ST165 Celica coupe (and I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing). I think the 180SX is dreadfully bland. It's not bad looking. But it has no excitement to it at all. It's just a liftback coupe thing with no interest in its lines, and bad graphical elements (ie wide expanses of taillight plastic on the rear garnish). The S13 Silvia is a little better - getting closer to R32 shapes. But still....bland. S14? Nope. Don't love it. S15...a little better. Probably a lot better, actually. Benefits from not being like a shrunk in the wash R34 (where the S13 was a shrunk in the wash R32 and the S14 looked like a Pulsar or something else from the stable on Nissan mid 90s horrors). The Z32 was hot as f**k when it came out but hasn't aged as well as the A80. Keep in mind that I think the R33 is the most disgusting looking thing - and out of all the previous cars mentioned is objectively closest to my precious R32. It's just....real bad, almost everywhere you look. And that is down to the majority of what was designed in the 90s being shit. All Nissans from that era look like shit. Most other brands ditto. In that context, the FD absolutely stands out as being by far the best looking car, for reasons already discussed. Going behind the aesthetics, the suspension alone makes it better than almost any other car.  
    • If they just called it the "Mazda Tiffany", it would have been spot on.
    • Yup but for me its the HR ! Cut my teeth on the old holden 6s in the day ! And here's me thinking in the day it was also the 300ZX and the Mitsubishi GT3000 ! All, as well had good lines, but always seemed to need finishing off, style wise.
    • A 180SX has a much better look than a FD. The roofline is far superior being a fastback. It's popups look better. In a world where we all subconsciously add a little bit of low, and wheels of our preference, it's just more handsome than the FD is. The FD just looks 'bubbly' in comparison. It can come down to preference, sure. But "The FD is the BEST looking (on appearances alone) 90's JDM car without question?" Nah. Plenty of questions lol. I could think of 8 cars I think look fundamentally better, and probably a handful of ones that look about on par with a FD. (like say a SW20 MR2) I feel people like/overrate the FD because of it's mythicality/rarity, its rotary and it's unpredictable nature. It probably drives great, you can stuff a ton of tyre under there, has a unique sound, light as hell. I feel that people reading this thinking "YOU CANT RATE A 180 ABOVE A FD BECAUSE A 180 IS A CHEAP DRIFT BUCKET" prove the point about bias as to what the car represents, moreso than how it actually looks.. I feel the 80's boxy/squared off look is becoming better looking due to time, and 90's melted soap bar aesthetics have not aged well. (yet?) And this thread is purely about looks :p
    • A red or yellow S15 wins my vote, Ack that it just scraps in with the 90's cars theme, but they are great looking little sports car Next would be a A80 Supra (pre face lift), whilst the A80 has its own issues, I feel is the best looking larger GT car As for the FD, "I" feel that the reason it triggers me in a non-positve way when looking at one, is like looking at a high maintenance pretty girl who you know is mentally unstable and likely to explode for no apparent reason
×
×
  • Create New...