Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey there, 380rwkw r33, standard suspension, 18x255x30 toyo proxes tyres, i would like to keep my car standard looking, maybe just lower it 1 inch all round though, will this effect rear traction when drag racing? are 30 series tyres a bit low profile for drag racing? if so what profile would be better? should i get some standard 17x255 for the track?

cheers robbie

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/223996-gtr-suspensiontyres/
Share on other sites

the best suspension for drag racing is stock suspension... unless ofcourse you wanna go r.i.p.s styles.

but for the average joe skyline owner stock suspension nice n spongy,

tyres the more wall the better...

why you might ask, running 16, s 225 50's deflat them to 16 psi...then shove some 18's on your ca and see how your launch goes.... compare them, then you will understand why a 15 ich drag slick will get more grip than your bling bling 18 inch enkie light wieght circut rims

the best suspension for drag racing is stock suspension... unless ofcourse you wanna go r.i.p.s styles.

but for the average joe skyline owner stock suspension nice n spongy,

tyres the more wall the better...

why you might ask, running 16, s 225 50's deflat them to 16 psi...then shove some 18's on your ca and see how your launch goes.... compare them, then you will understand why a 15 ich drag slick will get more grip than your bling bling 18 inch enkie light wieght circut rims

hey thanks for the advice

robbie

  • 2 weeks later...

Lowering will increase your static camber (which you can fix), but your dynamic camber will also increase which isn't easy to fix. What this means is, as the car squats, you gain heaps of camber and throw away grip.

Also, just going by theory, I would think for a 4wd, you'd want as little weight transfer rearwards as possible, so you have the most even weight distribution between the front and rear tyres as possible. If this is the case, then you'd want to run something a bit firmer in terms of shocks/springs. But this is just theory, someone with experience would be able to tell you more :D

Lowering will increase your static camber (which you can fix), but your dynamic camber will also increase which isn't easy to fix. What this means is, as the car squats, you gain heaps of camber and throw away grip.

Also, just going by theory, I would think for a 4wd, you'd want as little weight transfer rearwards as possible, so you have the most even weight distribution between the front and rear tyres as possible. If this is the case, then you'd want to run something a bit firmer in terms of shocks/springs. But this is just theory, someone with experience would be able to tell you more :)

hey thanks for your help

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And make sure the belts are tightened appropriately too.
    • They care about emissions, and cost the most. Save weight where possible, and make manufacturing easier. Less material also let's the engine transfer heat to water quicker, and bring the engine up to temp quicker, better for emissions and getting them past their warranty period.
    • I was under the impression the reason why OEMs are going with solutions like relatively thin "right-sized" cylinder walls with technologies like PTWA and open deck is because they care a lot about whatever marginal knock margin benefits they get from that vs the structural rigidity benefits of a closed deck block and thicker cylinder walls. I also see some weird stuff like plastic inserts in the water jacket around the cylinders to try and equalize cylinder wall temperatures. re: the PRP blocks and heads at the end of the day it's hard to know what is and isn't going to work there, just have to see what the initial buyers say about it.
    • Which is why I didn't mention that hardness testing, and specifically mentioned the bore and deck thickness testing. Yeah, not really. The bore temperature will be a lot more even around the top half inch or so, where the material distribution is dominated by the deck, and which is the only place where the bore surface temperature heating any gas in the cylinder is likely to have any effect on detonation. Think about it. Another inch or so down the bore, you might have a hotter spot. The gas there might get a bit hotter, then the piston rises squeezes that gas away from there at high speed and mixes it with other gas from nearby. Instant dilution of the problem. I'd be surprised if it was an issue at any time other than in racing engines or OEM dev engines being run at the ragged edge of tuning. Say what now?
    • https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/education/engine-tech-material-hardness-testing/ The PRP testing on block hardness I'm not sure how much it actually can be trusted. The thinner cylinder walls on RBs is a bit of a problem vs 2JZ but it really depends on the design goal. Siamesed cylinder bores like a 2JZ cause uneven cylinder wall temps too, which means a bit of distortion induced by that + the hotspot can affect knock margin. Something that actually gives me a bit of pause with the PRP block, whether super thick cylinder walls are going to keep it from being drop-in compatible on an otherwise OEM rebuild. 
×
×
  • Create New...