Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all, i own a 1984 Skyline Ti L24E (Auto)

The only mods so far are that i have cut a big hole (pretty much the entire nissan logo bit cut out) in the airbox lid, this made a noticable diference to power, and it sounds nuts, i recomend anyone else with this car does this mod.

Anyway, my problem is that when trying to see how fast it would go, it wouldnt shift into fourth, got up to almost 200 in third, (crazy revs!!). It shifts into fourth when i back off, but if i try to accelerate it drops back to third. Anyone else have this problem?

Any ideas or sugestions would be apreciated.

Also, ive been told that an RB series motor is a direct bolt in, if i use an R31 crossmember. Is it that simple, will the RB motor bolt up to my gearbox, could i use a manual gearbox from a R31 Skyline or VL Commadore.

How much more power does a RB30 motor have over my L24E, cause the other day a dragged a manual R31 Sihloutte skyline and kicked his arse.

Any help aprecieted, can we get a forrum just for R30s?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/22430-r30-197kph-in-third-bout-7000-rpm/
Share on other sites

Hey dude,

I am just about to make up a list for converting an RB into a r30.

rb30 has stock 118Kw at fly from memory

l24e only have about 90-100Kw

but seem to make the power more efficiently?

mates l24e manual drags them too

my l28e manual eats them

in all the L series engines are probably a bit better than the early RBs non DOHC engines

as for your speed i have had mine in 5th go past 200kmh and stop on the needle (about 10-20km past 200kmh) and only be sitting on a bit over 5K revs

i will compile a list for the engine conversion, but i would suggest you save your pennys and not get an RB30. I myself am going with an RB20DET

Originally posted by PHaT MR30

in all the L series engines are probably a bit better than the early RBs non DOHC engines

???

the 86 NICS motor was a DOHC...

That was the first in the series of RB... along with the RB20et in the passage i believe.

So they do come Twin Cam in the first Gen RB.

I was origianly planning on a RB20DET and 5 spd manual from a R32, had a price on a half cut at between $2000 and $2500.

Didnt have much info on it, and brought a new mountain bike instead, now i have no cash saved up, so an RB20 is a long way off.

The reason i thaught RB30 is that i can get one real cheap, but im not sure if it would be worth the bother, or money. The main advantage is that when i could afford a RB20DET it would bolt straight in as i would already have the conversion done.

When I had my VL 3ltr NA Manual it used to beat VS v6 Commodores no problems and even used to beat the 5ltr Auto VN-VS commodores off the line (1/4 of a car in front) then would sit even up top.

So i guess it would have been running in the low to mid 15 sec range some where.

I had it dyno'd, throttle body cleaned, injectors cleaned etc etc and it made 93rwkw on a DD Dyno.

It had Extractors and exhaust.

I wouldn't waste my time with the RB20DET unless you are looking at a maximum of around 180rwkw as I find they are to laggy for the street. The power isn't that tractable as it snapps and wheel spins easily.

It is fun I guess pulling out of corners in second or over taking people from 60kays and sending your self sideways past them but in all reality i want to have some thing that is easily quick off the line. Hence why a Rebuilt rb30 bottom end and RB25de head with a little bit of porting and cc'd will be getting dropped in soon. :)

If you don't want to go silly with the internals the bottom end rebuild costs around 1k + the RB25DE head that I picked up for $750 from Adelaide Jap.

Head rebuild is costing around 300 and the head work is around the 450 mark.

The RB25DE VRS kit (inc. all top end gaskets) costs $275 from nissan.

Fuel economy improves quite a bit with the twin cam head.. ;)

BUT.. in realistically a RB30E upped compression and wade cam will go pretty hard and chances are will be sitting in the high 14sec range.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
    • Corvette thread then? Don't say I didn't predict the future again. "I love the little MX5, I do, but I just want something a little easier to get in/out of, a little more cushy and some power would be nice - I miss the V8 Rumble... I found this clean red C5 for sale recently and..." I'll do you a great deal on the next step, which is one of those but you can fit people in it, too.
    • What about renewable diesel and/or gasoline? I see some projects spinning up like de-oxygenating ethanol to make drop-in compatible bio-gasoline especially in CA. I still think the future is EVs and we should've all gone full throttle on nuclear power after the 1973 oil crisis like France. Despite 15 years of work in CA to reduce the CO2 intensity of generation with renewables our electric grid is still far worse than even "low carbon" nuclear power. ICE is pretty cool when you aren't depending on the stupid thing to be practical and reliable and cheap as possible to get you to work every day. It's kind of like mechanical watches or vacuum tube amps.
    • I just rolled over "my" first 10k km in the MX5 Every time I go anywhere it always ends up in a adventure to look at houses and find some random country roads I've been on leave since early November but unfortunately need to go back to work on 19 January Luckily though I still have a fair chunk of leave left to burn until.... Not that I'm counting 😁
    • These look like S13 wheels.  And Welcome! 
×
×
  • Create New...