Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

agreed - when choosing an oil for your motor you definitely need to be aware of the condition of your motor and the conditions the motor will be subject to

i would also accept for fact that there has been more engine failures due to poorly-selected lighter weight oils sheering down as opposed to failures of higher pressure / oil pump failure due to heavier weight oils being used

i will add that the only application where i see a 50w performing better than a good quality 40w is during prolonged extreme temperature applications - like track days / racing - on the street i think a well versed 40w or even a 30w will perform more efficiently lubricity wise for most applications / motors - the exception being internally built motors which again have differing tollerances

are you able to disclose what you have learned from your trial and errors between different weights - as well how did you find your oil pressure and temperature reading between say a 40w and a 50w? being a 15w cold did it take longer to reach optimum temperature and pressure?

MSR - who is a premier Subaru tuner and engine builder recommends a diesel mineral 15w-40 which is quite thick - he recommends that these cars are warmed up prior to being driven and driving should be very sedate until the oil pressure has fully stabilized - usually after 20 mins of driving

in saying that i have seen more well performing UOAs on thinner oils than i have seen in heavier weights - across a wide board of weather conditions / cars

One of the issues of making blanket recommendations is that every engine will be different. A tighter engine will run happily on ‘thinner’ oil such as a 0W30, but if you’ve got an engine with loose clearances then it will reduce bearing life. The engine failure thread is littered with examples of RB engines spinning bearings. This is not scientific of course, but most examples seem to be running oil on the thinner side of the spectrum.

i would have to disagree to an extent here, is i think although many oil manufacturers are moving to reduce costs in the manufacturing process of their oil - there are some manufacturers who are continually bringing out oils to further exceed and prolong any motors requirements (im talking about the fuel injected age ofcourse - not the carby era)

Manufacturers like Motul / Amsoil / Redline / Royal Purple are a few that i have seen further improve oils that would further benefit our engines - with the introduction of many new Esters, on top of Molybdenum and Zinc - i really think oil is as good as it has ever been for fuel injected cars

On top of this, there are other aspects to consider such as additives missing from newer oils that may be necessary for the long term reliability of older engines (e.g. zinc and phosphorus).
Edited by squareznboxez

I think another thing you all need to keep in mind is that the manufacturer recommendation is for maximum economy on a COMPLETELY stock motor. Start modifying and that goes out the window.

Squarezandboxez: I read through some of your source material, and it's still a lot of opinion. The MSDS for example you cite isn't even off the Castrol website! I did however look it up on there, and it made no mention of the additive package used. I also think you're drawing a bit of a long bow to say that the prescence of an organic based compound in the additive package is indicative of it being hydrocrack rather than PAO base stock.

In regards to weights, I can tell you that the 25w50 made the lifters rattle terribly for the first 5 minutes or so on a cold start, whereas the 10w60 is momentary (hydraulic DoD lifters need oil pressure to not tick)

I'm not sucked in by the marketing hyperbole about 'titanium fluid strength' and such things either.

The only real expert opinion / testing I could find was that of Steve from Mainlube (who also manufactures a true Group 4/5 racing oil, as used by some rather big name workshops) who only recommends the Castrol 10w60 over anything else for those who can't afford to buy Mainlube, for any modified LS cars. I can't find the actual Filtergram or I'd post it, just awaiting my UOA kit to send off to find out how the Edge performs with a 10000km service interval.

are you able to disclose what you have learned from your trial and errors between different weights - as well how did you find your oil pressure and temperature reading between say a 40w and a 50w? being a 15w cold did it take longer to reach optimum temperature and pressure?

My cooling system is 100% stock R32 GTR so it still has the oil/coolant heat exchanger. Therefore the oil gets up to temperature quite quickly - around 10 minutes with light throttle (depending on the ambient temperature). Oil pressure is obviously very high on a cold start but settles down within a few minutes. Amongst others, I tried a 10W40 (noisy on a cold start, lowish oil pressure) as well as a 10W60 (noisy on a cold start, highish oil pressure). The 15W50 seemed to be happy medium with little cold start noise (note I only drive the car on some weekends so the car can sit unused for a while) and oil pressure readings through the rev range that were only slightly on the high side of the factory specifications. Oil temperature is fairly stable at just above the 90 degree mark, although it can get up to 100 degrees under certain conditions.

Note it is not an appropriate viscosity oil if you jump in the car and give it wide throttle openings straight away!

MSR - who is a premier Subaru tuner and engine builder recommends a diesel mineral 15w-40 which is quite thick - he recommends that these cars are warmed up prior to being driven and driving should be very sedate until the oil pressure has fully stabilized - usually after 20 mins of driving

Interesting, they probably build engines with that viscosity oil in mind. I would run a 15W40 if I could get a quality easy to find oil in that grade.

I've just sent off oil from the last oil change to be analysed. I'll post the results when I get them if you're interested.

It's a good oil, you won't be disappointed.

I managed to source a 20L drum for $120 through Repco, but then I had to buy the pump for it...

asif use a pump...pour it like a man..with no funnel..

or fuly automated like this if you own a honda :P

59609_10151349817256499_902828608_n.jpg

{that drum cost me 150...my ute is 80 for 10l...if the rating is right on the gulf would be great}

but seriously why you need a pump..usualy they come with a little tap you screw in the bottom....i got stacks of taps if you need em

120$ is a bargain tho..is it SN rated...or CI what number??

Let me know what it's like and how much you can get it for, after running the Sougi 6000 for 4 years I am a GW fan for life now... :)

Couldn't find it in my local repco or Autostooge so forked out the extra for Castrol Edge 10w60

Will change oil next weekend.

I want to do it after using some subaru upper engine cleaner - even though it's an RB25

Edited by TTT

how does retarded timing cause extra heat?

and does advanced timing cause lower temps?

Old post but retarded timing means that lots of the energy is lost as heat out the exhaust port, advanced timing means more of that heat is converted into mechanical energy.

MSR - who is a premier Subaru tuner and engine builder recommends a diesel mineral 15w-40 which is quite thick - he recommends that these cars are warmed up prior to being driven and driving should be very sedate until the oil pressure has fully stabilized - usually after 20 mins of driving

I'm coming up to my first oil change since buying my Skyline (1994 R33 GTST). What's the opinion on Caltex Delo 400?

It's a mineral based fleet oil. I've used it on diesels, turbo-diesels, carby and fuel injected NA engines and even in my bike. So far Delo has been the bees knees for me; and at $75 for a 20L drum it is well budget. Is it a good idea to use Delo in a RB25DET?

Mileage: nfi (still running smooth, plenty of compression)

Boost: 7 psi

Drain interval: 5000 km

I drive it as a daily

My used oil analysis came back.

post-92407-0-89056400-1355370725_thumb.png

http://www.roktex.co...ublished=527460

Nulon 15W50 with around 6 months (April to October) and 3500 km on the oil. Looks alright to me. I'm surprised at the lack of fuel dilution given the generally rich tune.

No idea where the titanium would have come from though... One of the downsides of having no idea what is inside the engine.

Edited by BuuBox

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ok now I’m extremely jealous 
    • Exactly, when searching online they were a lot more common on S13s, but have seen quite a few of Skyline GTSs with them as well.
    • Thanks for the feedback!   “Hard to say what the extra connector is, it looks a bit like a coax type connector, so possibly a separate radio/GPS antenna, or even another camera input?  The V37 series (including the Q50), did go through a model refresh in 2020, since Australia didn't get any Q50s newer than 2019, we didn't get any of the refreshed models, so there could also be other unexpected problems to overcome to swap an older Q50 head unit into a new model V37.” I wonder if the extra plug out has anything to do with the factory optioned drive recorder, or traffic updates. It looks like these systems link to the main screens too, and probably rv37 specific over Q50 perhaps?   “Regarding the TV standards, I assume you are referring to the AV inputs?  I haven't ever tried to use them, Japan used a slightly modified version of the US NTSC system, and Australia uses PAL for composite video, that said, I wouldn't be surprised if a video input could work with either system.  That is mostly irrelevant here though, unless you plan to use those inputs for something?” The car has a Japanese TV in it already. For compliance it will be disconnected I think.  From what I read it only works when the handbrake is engaged anyways, but an aftermarket module can be installed for use with handbrake not applied. I was more so curious if there was a way to convert the NTSC to PAL for Australian operation. (I don’t need it but it’s cool to have the gadgets working) I have a BNR34 MFD I converted years ago to take PAL signal in my skyline and I linked it to the DVD Head unit for dual screen use. There was some write up on SAU back in the day how to do it and I can’t remember what was involved. So sorta curious what can be done here etc.  “So, Pac posted in the other thread about a box that plugs into the USB C and gives you full Android OS to run whatever modern/connected nav you want on the top screen, and it still automatically switches back to function” The Rv37 model comes with Apple play and Android, I think the Q50 doesn’t? so for me I can simply plug my phone into the usb or maybe blue tooth and that will become it’s own Nav that way independent  I’m happy for this option but again figured if there was a factory module can it be used or updated.  It had SD card slot for map updates so I could update it if I can get AUS specific maps on it,   That alibaba screen does look neat.  I’m not ready to bust a move just yet on it or something like to as my car can take my Apple iPhone already.  Also it doesn’t say it suits current model Rv37 skylines but the Q50, so perhaps it may not be skyline compatible.  I’d love to see one installed to know first hand or even see one in Q50 and hear some feedback, is it cheap Chinese junk!? Is it good? Does it suit RHD? Is it internet compatible like a normal tablet, and will it support all rv37 specific options like map zoom and steering wheel control and Bose system and so on.. I’m certainly intrigued and interested       I’ve done some digging around.; my local Nissan has a tech guy ex Infiniti and he wants to try trick the nav unit into think it’s q50 so it takes Aussie software or something,  When it arrives I will take it there and see what he can do.    Also seems we no longer have Nissan connect app available in Australia now. I’ve read my dealer books etc at home and it seems in Japan via that app you can purchase internet plans for the rv37 skyline to work through the screens inside. it seems that you can get traffic updates, it links to ETC, and I believe the in car specific recorders. This video then is all stored and visible via app. the Nissan connect app can also be used for remotely starting and controlling heaters etc from afar. Seems tv was also part of this. I’ll have a further look and play when it arrives. (I wonder if I can somehow get the Japan version of Nissan connect on my phone and use the remote start features etc) App Store won’t allow it as region specific- need configure that one   rv37 has multiple security options and packages.  Premium package comes with tilt sensor, remote and battery in siren, and can be bundled with auto mirror retract when locked, door jam illumination when opened on drivers side only, and also remote start.  Otherwise all modules can be purchased separately and still applied but easier to do as a whole and bundle for shared hardware and looms. (This is where Nissan Japan have advised the security part needs a dealer device to set up). Australia dealers have advised me Australian delivered models weren’t offered factory optioned  security systems so they don’t really know what’s entailed and what device.  Nissan Japan state that the other components like mirror retract and door lighting and remote start should still work on that package even if security doesn’t (however security still may).  I’m tempted to purchase and take the risk on this. There’s a possibility it can be made to work by piggybacking off signals etc instead too.     im curious if any Q50 owners have a factory optioned security system with these options or just a factory optioned system. If so I’d imagine the same device or process for installation should be needed meaning someone with Q50 dealer Experience may know. (Waiting on my local tech to get back to quiz further here prior to ordering)   and like q50 some of the v37 models have the scuff panel illumination and the footwel illumination too.  I see 400R wasn’t compatible according to Nissan diagrams.  I’m guessing it didn’t have a plug out for this. Would be a nice addition… I wonder if anyone has this in a rv37 or q50 and has a wiring diagram or booklet for installation to know where to piggyback the system too.  Seems to activated by door opening, so if imagine it would grab a door ajar signal and 12v and earth and probably ignition, but curious to know more as it’s pretty much the only factory option the 400R doesn’t take.     Thanks for your inputs. I’m finding so little information rv37 skyline specific as apposed to Q50 so trying to pioneer forwards and see can and can’t work and what options are there to help.  I’ll keep updated when the car is landed and ready to play with on these things in the hope it helps others and my journey can assist.  Appreciate any input and help.  Cheers 
    • Nah, if I need to fit people in a car I'll just use the Mrs car, the MX5 is perfect for what I need as a fun little sports car for fun on the street As for getting in and out of the MX5, I have no issues as I am a short arse who does lots of mobility training 🥷 If anything, I have been looking at Daihatsu Hi-Jets for a work hack, I helped one of my mates move some stuff with one recently that he picked up from Just Jap, it was a little ripper and plenty big enough for what we needed, it would also be super handy for me as I do alot of gardening, and plan on having some veggie patches and native gardens in the place I buy next year when I retire I did alot landscape gardening and growing veggies prior to my current job, and loved it, and that is a hobby that can keep me sane in my retirement, and as such, the little 300kg load capacity would be more than enough for what I need it to move around I have been looking at utes for just this purpose for a while now, and a near new 2024 Hi-Jet can be had for under $30k And I would rather look at a quirky little Hi-Jet than pretty much any other little ute, well, apart from a Brumby, I love the little Brumby, and weirdly have never owned one yet I was going to buy a heap of raffle tickets to try and win the Brumby that MCM built for Subaru Australia, but sadly I totally missed the raffle, I even filled in some form to be told when the raffle started so I could buy tickets, but to my dismay I was never contacted and found out I missed it when I was randomly googling Brumbys last year... #conspiracy  Maybe I should just buy a Brumby for a little "work hack".....LOL I use to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure
    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
×
×
  • Create New...