Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Snap.

After endless "best oil" searching and no discernable conclusion looking likely , ever, I went with a Valvolene 10-30 semi syn which behaved like flushing oil when hot according to my oil pressure gauge so I rissoled it after 20ks and having read every oil bottle label in Autobarn that seemed remotely relevant I to decided on the Nulon 10-40 fast flow fullsyn and so far it's looking good, nice hot /cold oil pressures and the engine sounds comfortable.

Not at all technical but seems as good a yard stick as many I've read.

:rolleyes:

+1

Been running nulon 10w40 full syn for 2 years now and I'm also happy with it. I changed oil and filter every 5000k, then after rebuild did it every 3000k, and straight after track days. Also happy with cold and hot running pressures and engine is smooth.

i have a 2000 r34 gtt, manual with 80,000km and was after some gearbox oil, ive looked for a long hard time and are having trouble making sence of things.

i just want to know what to get? how many litres and how much roughly it is, im in vic, eastern suburbs

Also was looking at castrol motor oil for the engine but they dont offer a full synthic 5-40w?

Hmm fair enough. I'm pretty sure the Motul rep we used to have said 4100 was a group III. I also got told Motul don't make anything below a group III, yet on that list it lists a group II?

whoever told you is wrong we only NOW make group 4 oils and up as we discontinued all our 400 motion and 2000 mineral range in package line

http://www.motul.com.au/product_line_up/4s.../4stroke20.html

That clearly states that 4100 is a semi-synth

well it is in acea (European) standards as thats what Motul go by as to them anything but 100% synthetics are semis it's quite complicated .......

  • 2 weeks later...
I'm using Castrol Formula R 5W-30 (full synth). It costs $50 for 5 litres from Auto 1.

Edit: I no longer use the above oil. Not so much for the thickness of the oil but mostly because I think it's hell dodgy for a synthetic oil. I gave up using Castrol long ago.

Do a search, The engine oil bible, it's worth a read.

There is tons of stuff on the web when it comes to oil.

Can anyone help me?

My car is just a fairly stock 33 gtst(just got exhaust and a pod filter). It is never tracked and isnt driven much harder than the average prius, though I very occasionally engage in a bit of spirited driving. Most of my trips are quite short though average drive would be about 5km. I am about to do the first oil change on it since my ownership which is ~8500kms since last owner did it.

Which oil should I be using, preferably would like something not too expensive, $80 for 5L would be about my limit if possible. I was thinking also 10w40 grade? is this good for the application. Also would like to know where I can buy some decent oil in perth as I cant find anything other than just basic supercheap auto stuff

If its a stockish R33 GTST and your changing often you could go a cheaper oil, Performancelub (see signature) sells quality oil with cheap shipping.

I personally use German Castrol 0w30 in a GTR and it was good, I'm also trying Amsoil 10w40 although its a little more expensive.

hey all

i stupidly picked up some Mobil 1 0w40 oil for the R34 the other day (after being told any decent synthetic will do). now im being told it could be too thin for the engine

so should i take it back and get something like 5w or 10w?

as far as im concered.. the lower the cold weight the better....

u want thin oil at start up = fast lubrication of the engine and its not like you will trash the car when its cold.

Whoever told you its too "thin" doesnt know what they are talking about.

btw the difference between 0 and 5 is literally nothing.

I Currently use Motul Turbolight 4100 10w40 in my R32 Gts-t for day to day driving and am very pleased with it... :cool:

But I want to start some track/drift work :banana: so,

What viscosity Motul oils do you guys recommend for track use?

you' be surprised how many mechanics, shop assistants etc will tell you that a 5w or 0w oil is "too thin" for an RB motor.

Probably is for an rb30 or an old redtop rb20. My rb30s and old rb20 both leaked when using 5-40 fully synth. When I put 10-40 semi synth in them they stopped burning and leaking oil.

Protection wise theres no such thing as too thin oil, but on an old motor with poor tollerances too thin oil will leak and get in places it shouldn't.

Edited by Rolls

hey guys just about to do a motor oil change and last service i used castrol. but was looking for a change.. seen today the nulon looked decent.. anyone have any recommendations on whats worth a good go..

i own an r32 gtr pushin 300kw+ or thereabouts at wheels.. its now daily driven and also gets a decent revvin here and there :)

oh and its done just over 80000ks..

cheers

Corey

  • 2 weeks later...

I know nothing about oils and have no mechanical qualifications outside of , I hope , common sense and 45 years of driving experiance and DIY servicing .

After reading a shit load of posts it would seem to me the problem is one that is inherant with the RB engines and that is that the pump shoves all the oil into the top of the block/head and as the oil can't drain back fast enough so the bottom end 'can' starve resulting in spun bearings and all sorts of mischief.

Basicly what this would seem to mean in a practical sense is that an engine that should be good on 15x50 in summer and 10x40 in winter (never mind the syn v dino atm) actualy has a manufacturers spec of 7.5 x 30 so that it's thin enough to actualy drain back and not cause bottom end starvation , what a crock, 7.5 x 30 what were they thinking ?

Living in SE Qld I am lucky enough to not to have to worry to much about wildly excesive high/low temperatures,sure we get a couple of chilly ones and a few hot ones so good ole common sense says to me no floggy when too hot/cold.

As the average ambient temp is consistantly higher here that the manufacturers would have likely planned for in most of these cars I have gone for 10 x 40 Nulon Hi Flow Full Synthetic (as I posted previously) .

The price is good, the oil specification seems on the money and the results seem fine with a good hot/cold oil pressure, smooth running engine and a fuel consumption of 13.3ltr 100klms.(98 R34GTT)

I now wait with baited breath for someone to shoot down my methodoligy :D

Corey is that a genuine 80,000kms or is that just what the speedo says?

Mark

not entirely certain mate, car was imported by a mate whom imports personally.. he hasnt got a yard tho..

and when i got it 2 yrs ago it had 60000 on it then, i saw all the auction paperwork stating grade 4 etc., my interior is spotless. underneath is perfect. it came with everything very standard on it..

but in saying that i dont know how else to tell..

it came in very good condition.. no real wear in all the usual places..

thinking about using nulon.. seems to be decent from what im reading..

Wow, sounds like a winner mate, nice. That condition is a pretty good indicator. The odometer rarely lines up once it has been rewound. Plus, the purchase price may be an indicator as guys selling good cars will not sell them for same as the old clunkers, and it's hard (not impossible) to pass off an old clunker as a good car.

Nulon 10-40W sounds like the ticket. Well, any 10-40 but if Nulon floats your boat, then go for it. I'm no oil expert, yet I never had any dramas relating to oil or ever sat there thinking "...if only I bought the Royal Purple..."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pfft. As if I'd ever point a high pressure washer at my car.
    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I could do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free. It's only about 50L per year, but that's ~$100. A few extra pizzas is always welcome. Note that I have a record of every tank of fuel that has ever gone through my car except for a handful put in by someone else, like my mechanic. I can show you the difference between stock RB20 and tuned RB20, stock RB5Neo and tuned, winter and summer fuel blends, winter and summer fuel blends when the ambient temperature is not appropriate for the blend, working O2 sensor, blown O2 sensor, boosting f**k out of it and frightened to boost it because it is pinging, and so on. OK, I probably can't do all that now with 100% clarity - but at the time when any of those things were in event, you could see it in the records. There's 25+ years of simple tank after tank records, so you have to look for landmarks to work out approximately how old any single record is. What's really important is the meta data and that lives in my head.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
    • The funniest part I saw, was someone would bitch and moan on FB about something, Andy would be the one to respond, asking for more info, if he could contact them, what the engine setup is, what their config file was, and 95% of the responses were people just going "der! It doesn't work" and Andy going "What doesn't work?" And then going "The firmware!" And they'd go around in circles as no one could ever give information, and Haltech couldn't fault things on the bench, (especially when people wouldn't give any specifics).   Many moons ago, when Andy was back at e420c stage, he reached out to me, and asked me to test different plug and play looms for him (already had an e420c in the car on his V1 PNP loom). And he kept asking me, as I was competent enough to be able to give him some specific feedback on what was/wasn't working, how to replicate the faults etc, and work through things with him. Most people are terrible at answering the questions they're asked, or being able to provide quality feedback other than "it doesn't work".
    • I say it often, none of this stuff is really Skyline-specific per se. But in general there's not a lot of people who actually know what they're doing. A lot of people charging like they do. Agile software development probably isn't the greatest idea for an engine controller.
×
×
  • Create New...