Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hey if i got caught doing 100+ in a 60 zone it would serve me right too!!!

I recently got done for 80 in a 60 zone downhill in a work car, because i was in a bad mood and not concentrating. It was bloody stupid and serves me right for not concentrating.

What sort of area was it in?

i've been on 1 points for the last 14 months, and yes the laws are a joke atm. i think it's an undermine policy to get all of us into public transport. as for my last point it's only in danger if i pull over and yes i do speed on the rd and i'm not ashame about it. FARK the law. and anyone here think that they don't speed,is being a hyprocrite.

i travels a fair bit doing my day time job and i can tell u one thing speed is a cause of some srioues accidents and have claim lives, but nothing evens remotely come close to inexperience, and by tightening the speed limits get the whole community in one go, but it will never removes the attrition rate. we are humans in the end. and to treat humans as a constant and getting results is the same as the likelyhood of seeing the pope giving birth to a son.

james... all you do is whinge about your loss of license.. dont think you can comment.

and in not all cases does 100 in a 60 zone take much loss of concentration. I was doing 108 in a 60 zone.. i over took a car doing 40 and pulled back in and was doing that speed. Was actually an 80 zone, but we r waiting to go to court on that one still..

anyway - its true if u do the crime u do the time.... no harm in whingiing tho :)

yeah i was done for 157 ina 60 zone 2 years ago, and got my license suspended for 1 day and $350 fine.

i got done for 112 in a 60 zone, which is 8 points,6 months and $700. Then got caught doing 80 BEFORE the 80 sign on the ramp for the icb.

yes i was speeding, but ****ing hell if you know how stressful things have been for me in the last 2 months you would have killed yourself.

but now I have time to play computer games, work only 12 hour days(im at work now btw) and not able to get up to the police station to pay my fines because i cant afford to get a taxi everywhere.

It's an arrestable offense when u don't pull over and gun it up the rd, and if u have made the choice never look back and get as far away as possible from ur last point of contact, and also prolly pay to visit a local park or nearest town house complex.

anyone made that choice? I know I did once, saw a patrol car going the other way on a two land divided road. We made eye contact, I saluted :upurs: and planted it...just kidding, We both knew he cought me speeding but I had a median strip between us, so I took about 5 turns into a residential area, straight up someones driveway into there carport, headlights off, head down, sparked up a smoke. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...