Jump to content
SAU Community

The Battle For Japanese Supercar Stardom Begins Anew


Recommended Posts

But N1 > NSXR and GTR R34 > NSX

and the R34 u just listed was stock but with the speed limiter removed.. it was the fastest production car around the ring.. including the NSXR :P

Im gonna need more than that. Info on this is hard to find.

*goes away to shuffle through japanese websites looking for KO blow*

  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

8:03 Honda NSX-R (NA1) 280 PS/1230 kg Motoharu Kurosawa Best MOTORing 02/06

there u go :P slower than the R33

8:09 Honda NSX-R 320 PS/1467 kg Sport Auto 08/02 Sport tires, suspension modification

8:22 Nissan Skyline GT-R R32 280 PS/1430 kg Motoharu Kurosawa Best Motoring Video Special DVD

8:24 Mitsubishi Charisma GT Evo VI Horst von Saurma Sport Auto 11/99 Sport tires

8:25 Mitsubishi Charisma GT Evo VII Horst von Saurma Sport Auto 11/02 Sport tires

8:38 Honda NSX Sport Auto, 08/97

as u can see the r32 even best most of the current crop cars...

but to tell u the truth..

i would own a nsxr over almost all those cars.. cept for my gtr and the r34 N1 lol :P

Im aware the R34 was faster around a circuit but 0-400 times specifically is what im after.

Its damn hard to find anything accurate even though proof has been shown of the NSX trouncing the R32, 33 and 34 in a 400 metre dash.

Its hard to find data on the NSX - R quarter time and even harder to find GTR N1 times.///../

But, find em i will. :P

Look i dont see what the point is in arguring over the past..

R34 won back then.. it doesnt matter because honda wasnt never competeing with the GTR or the Supra

But it is now.. Honda has made a claim that it wont come out until it whips the GTR.. and its a proper direct competition.. something that it never was despite what u might think m3gtr...

Toyota never said THIS SUPRA WILL KILL THE GTR.. or THE NSX IS A GTR KILLER... never ever.. thats something that us as customers have taken upon ourselves to do..

This time thou, its different like i said and honda is on a mission to knock the gtr off the podium and it will

Look i dont see what the point is in arguring over the past..

R34 won back then.. it doesnt matter because honda wasnt never competeing with the GTR or the Supra

But it is now.. Honda has made a claim that it wont come out until it whips the GTR.. and its a proper direct competition.. something that it never was despite what u might think m3gtr...

Toyota never said THIS SUPRA WILL KILL THE GTR.. or THE NSX IS A GTR KILLER... never ever.. thats something that us as customers have taken upon ourselves to do..

This time thou, its different like i said and honda is on a mission to knock the gtr off the podium and it will

Its not an argument. The NSX is faster than any of the previous gen GTR's to 400 metres.

The GTR was not faster over a 1/4 mile when stock and if youd read the previous posts you would have seen that was the point in contention.

That and the fact the N1 was NOT a full volume factory production model but a stripped down, handbuilt special.

Thats why, i have asked if anyone knows more about the N! and the more hardcore NSX R GT

Argue all you want, all the data you find will be unreliable.

The OEM's say one thing (lies) and drivers, journo's, enthusiasts etc. do their own tests which aren't verifiable, ON TOP of the fact you're comparing data, with the GTR for eg., that can't be compared because you know at least one data-set (Nissan's) is a pile of BS.

You need these cars, factory spec, and a 2WD dyno, drag strip, on a 22-degree morning.

but it wasnt the fastest.. like i said b4.. theres a guy on OUR forums who has run a 12.4 with his stock r32 gtr...

Stock? Stock with nittos perhaps, lol. :P

What is this Bung? Looks like a tag team now.

Damnm, im cut above the left eye. :)

I am becoming slightly concerned for you....But whats your motto?

I'll take all comers ....... now don't forget it.

Takes a swarm to fell a giant :P

If you get tired..or just need a piss tag in Dr Doof..I know he's your cuts man but he'll have to do.

Edited by madbung
I am becoming slightly concerned for you....But whats your motto?

I'll take all comers now don't forget it.

Takes a swarm to fell a giant :P

If you get tired..or just need a piss tag in Dr Doof

*tags Doctor Death*

( a few seconds later )

*reaches for beer*

gubgubgubgub.

he posted it was stock.. but ur probably right.. it might have had tyres :D

as for driving pleasure.. apart from no electronics.. that VTEC sound comin frmo a V6... mmmmmmm tantalizing

Skyline man: Re the Z tune: The entire car is essentially handmade, with the car being completely stripped and re-built from the chassis up.

production car

pro·duc·tion car (plural pro·duc·tion cars)

noun Definition: car manufactured on production line: a car of a type manufactured in large numbers on a production line for general use

Stripping a car and modifying it, isn't production.

So you're saying that a hand built car isn't a production car? It doesn't matter how the car is built, whether by hand, feet, legs, by chimps or even idiots etc etc....If a company builds a car up to specs that makes it road safe, past emission tests, at least 15 models etc etc, then it qualifies as a production car. The Z-tune qualifies as a production car and IT IS a production car. Do your research moron! The Mclaren F1 was totally built by hand from the carbon fibre body to the engine etc, and it was not built on an assembly line. It is a production car. So from your logic, the Mclaren F1 isn't a production car as well?

Moron, Pronunciation:

\ˈmȯr-ˌän\

Function:

noun

Etymology:

irregular from Greek mōros foolish, stupid

Edited by skyline_man

*puts bourbon down* oh sif tag me in :D

Quite simply put... IT WASN'T PRODUCED BY THEM! It was modified... somewhat extensively, and 21 times, but it is still a modified original... The definition i have there for production cars is very flawed, it was the first one I found, but you can't argue that it's a modified original... Not to mention second hand...

It's a great car (god is jealous) and while it is endorsed by Nissan and is their crowning achievment thus far, it still isn't a production car...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'd suggest the answer to the first question is at least a qualified "yes". I'll come back to that. Pineapples just don't do a lot to solidify the mounting of the subframe. They do a little bit, and that little bit was clearly helpful to me in the past, but the main thing they are intended to be used for is to tip the orientation of the subframe to try to either dial in more or less anti-squat. You can install them one way to try to increase launch traction, or the other way to try to increase lateral grip (at the notional expense of longitudinal traction). Or, as I did, you install them neutral, which only really offers a little bit of "snugging" up of the subframe. When I did pineapples, that was the only option. No-one had a machined alloy collar like the GKTech ones. There were some other options, but nothing like the slip in collars. And it is clear from looking at them that they occupy almost all the free space inside the rubber bush, so they will do a lot to stop them moving internally. So I thought, "that's the game for me!". Obviously the next/adjacent step is poly bushes, but what's the point in doing that with all the work and hassle required to change them over, when jamming (and I mean literally jamming) some alloy into the rubber bushes probably gives an equivalent, or possibly even superior result? So, to go back to your 1st question, I would suggest, for the investment of <<$100 and a morning spent lying under the car swearing and getting some sore fingers, it is certainly something you should try. Who knows? Maybe your situation is so severe that it doesn't solve it. But it might help a lot. If your problem is as severe as you say it is, the next thing to look at is what the rest of the bushes in the rear end a made from. Things like the Hardrace arms with hardened rubber bushes might be a good thing (for the purposes of having adjustability AND stiffer bushes). Otherwise, just poly bushes throughout could be a help. Or following in my fever dream footsteps and putting a lot of sphericals into the rear? Eliminate undersired movement to avoid the build up of resonances that cause the tramp. Also, if you have adjustable uppers in the rear, and you haven't put effort into adjusting the traction arms to minimise bump steer, there might be some advantage in that. If you don't want to go to the effort of doing it yourself (like I am pretty much forced to in Adelaide, owing to a lack of race alignment specialists) then surely there's a place in Melbs that is able to do it. It will cost $$, But that's life.
    • As someone who has pineapples, and horrible axle tramp... should I change these to collars? Is that what you're saying here? Why did you choose these instead of getting pineapples where you said you had good experiences of? I'd love to even attempt to get rid of axle tramp, I either get complete bogginess or absolute insane wheelspin, anything even remotely in between results in filling-removal axle tramp, to the point where launching the car is just not something I do.
    • Lucky for that, because putting ethanol in fuel only lowers the bulk cost of fuel if it's in 91 Add it to 98, 85% of it even and it quintuples in price. Strange physics. f**k you United, Gouging c***ts.
    • Not noticeably. Arguably, the catless turbo is going to work harder in a different direction, as it will spool up faster, go to higher speeds more easily. Only if it was tuned in the original condition. If it was a stock tune, using the AFM before and after the cat/dump change, then no, no retune needed. If the car is running on a MAP sensor, then it might well benefit from a retune. It might even run a little dangerously without a retune, but it could quite easily be fine.
    • We had this blend that uses 98RON + 10% Ethanol which brought it to 100RON. It's no longer available anymore unfortunately.
×
×
  • Create New...