Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i think the psi's were around $1200 for a set dont quote me, and the supertech's are USD$459 (they come with their own titanium retainers)

Depends how much ur spending/want to spend on the head, with the dual springs you'll need to get a custom inner seat made for the inner spring

  • 1 month later...

Hi, I am just seeking some clarification on some of the info here about cam choices.

I am about to send my spare rb26 head out for porting and reconditioning etc. I will also be asking them to clearance the cam tunnel to accept bigger cams, and have budgeted to upgrade valve springs as per the comments on here. I am building a separate long motor with a 3.0 (realistically 3.1) bottom end to swap into my r32. Will be getting a fully balanced, forged etc bottom end from a shop and assembling myself.

In terms of the use, it will NOT be a daily driver, so off-boost response is not as crucial - however, I DO want my vaccuum assist to work from idle (ie brakes etc) w/o having a resevoir.

I have read on here that the 3.1 bottom end will "soak up" big cams, which intutiviely makes some sense - at the moment I am looking at either 272 or 280 duration, which provides lift in the region of 10-10.5 mm.

Is this ridiculous, unusable power for a 3.1? I would like to have boost on or before

4, 000 rpm. There will be inherent limits on revving out a big stroker motor. I also want working vacuum assist. As always, all advice or recommendations greatly appreciated.

i had a similar chat with dirtgarage about losing vacuum & braking power off-boost, could be very dangerous at times for a street car

im sure he can advise with his words of wisdom

...i just realised this is in the rb30 conversion group, he calls them 'forklift motors'...not much of a fan but i am :P

Edited by Marko R1

thanks, will wait any further feedback on loss of vaccuum.

My other queries relate to potential issues with valve-to-piston clearance using high-lift cams. Does anyone know at what lift the valves are at risk of hitting the pistons? I need to consider whether I want to raise the static compression ratio to compensate

for the lack of dynamic compression created by the big duration. Has anyone had any experience with using pistons with valve reliefs?

Finally, I am looking at having my porting work done by lewis engines in adelaide (very few choices in Canberra). Has anyone had any experience with them? feel free to shoot me a PM on that point.

perform a search on proengines, greg is very well priced with quick turnaround and everything he does is onsite and by 1 person so no middleman involved. has built way too many rb's and infact just about finished my 26/30.

ive seen my head porting which looks fantastic and is supplying flow bench testing with before v's after results...can i ask for more? others such as scooby have used the same workshop.

talk to greg about your setup, he can answer your q's mate :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
    • Yes, a plan for non-action is always my first sort of plan! I'm happy to see what falls out of invision's update. I had been having some thoughts on what to do with this the other day and they all seem to have fled my memory, after various solar panel induced traumas, squeaking suspension sphericals, etc etc, over the last little bit. I'll try and recall what I had in mind and make sure that I put it into print in some form before the Alzheimer's strikes again.
    • The ability to have both a 5500 stall for launching, and a regular lockup for every other scenario is pretty sweet. Does it actually work well like that though in the real world? Would it hold up to track use and otherwise you'd never know you had a stall converter in it? If so, that's awesome
    • The thing is, once the content has been tagged we can chop and change the end result as much as we want. Its identifying the content in the first place that needs to be done regardless of the final outcome.
    • Sorry @GTSBoy I thought I'd replied here. There's a new BIG version of invision coming out soon, it might be worth waiting until that happens as it contains a lot of improved functionality for tags. My suggestion would be to add a top level page (not thread) with some info on it and then link to sub pages for various topics. We could even just start really simple with 2 or 3 pages underneath it. Those pages could just have a view (like a pre configured search result) of the tags we choose to put on it. We could have some background or an intro on each of these pages. My only issue is that while admins and mods can update the existing content to contain the tags we want, new posts can have whatever tags the author wants. That said, the reason our tags are so messy is because of that, so maybe we restrict tagging to admins/mods in edits.
×
×
  • Create New...