Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yes that is valid, except looking at torque curves vs rpm is just as good a comparison as road speed imo.

But who cares what rpm things happen. You want to know what road speed its happening. No point in a guy grabbing the same turbo setup as me and expecting my results if he has std diff ratio, R33 gearbox and 19" wheels. The rpm he makes the power may be similar, but the road speed will be way different, with my car actually making loads more power sooner and leaving him for dead from a rolling start at 80km/h, or from corner exit of a 90km/h corner.

You need to look at what road speed you are getting the job done. It often highlights that no matter how small and responsive your turbo, and compromised top end. You may still end up with crappy power delivery coming out of a corner at 90km/h. Its smarter to drop wheel size or increse wheel size, or change diff ratio so that you can make way more top end power and still have usable power at corner exits.

The original poster is talking about using the 20 for motorsports...so gearing and where your power hits the road is more important then looking at the motor in isolation.

Most already apprecaite the subtle difference, but sometimes is worth repeating :woot:

i thought he was interested in comparing what happens at the crank with different turbo combinations on rb's, the road speed will just be a result of a bunch of other things that he might not want to change.

So basically I am looking for the best trade-off between quick spool and power output. I am just looking for turbo information, nothing else.
Edited by norwest_rumbler

cant find the graph yet but this gives you some idea...

Car : R32 GTST

Engine : Rb20det

Turbo / Supercharger : GCG RB25 hi-flowed turbo (converted to ext gate)

Mods to Note : Zorst, cooler, mangament, injectors/pump , spitfire coils, etc

Rev Limit : 8200rpm

Diff Ratio : Not sure

Dyno : Hyperdrive DD

Peak Power : 300rwhp

3000 rpm = Sub 40rwhp

3500 rpm = Sub 80rwhp

4000 rpm = Sub 100rwhp

4500 rpm = 110rwhp

I had one on my RB20 which was bloody tired (popped a few weeks later, not turbo related) and it still made decent power and was quite responsive. I think the thing should've made more power if the engine wasn't on it's last legs too. But still, 220rwkw on 1.4bar, not too shabby.

I'd love to see your dyno sheet of it being a pig, because mine completely disagrees with that.

Just the usual mods, nothing special, just turned the boost up lots :)

GCGvsRB25.jpg

Note: That's an RB25 turbo, not "standard" as the sheet indicates.

Boost starts ramping up 400rpm later and ramps up at the same rate. It started making more power than the stock RB25 turbo at 3600rpm and made full boost of 1.4bar (20psi) a smidge after that. 1bar came at around 3300-3400rpm.

lots of midrange timing would explain the engine popping a week later and the good response ;)

Like these guys have mentioned...hks2510 is the way to go if maximum response is what you're after...or like troy said...see if there is a T3 flanged gtss...that would be awesome...my old 32 had a hks2535 making 237rwkw had a decent trade off between power/response...but for what you want something smaller like a 2510 is hard to ignore...

Hi Roy , T3 flanged GTSS is a new one on me but there's no physical reason why it couldn't be done .

Just so people know the RB26 and SR20 style HKS GTSS turbos are different .

Housings are different because RB26 style housings are unique to that application .

The two turbines are different GT28's , RB type 11 bladed 62T version , SR version 9 bladed 76T one .

Different compressors , RB26 type is a bit of a special 59.6mm 56T , SR type generic 60.1mm 60T GT type .

HKS do T3 flanged GT28BB turbine housings for GT2530's and these would bolt up to an SR type GTSS turbo .

They used this same housing and turbine on RB20/25 specific GT2335/2540/GTRS as well .

The old 2510 is just a 2530 with the 11 blade 62T turbine substituted , same compressor wheel .

The SR type GTSS uses the better 76T turbine with a smaller trim comp (60T vs 63T) so its slighty more biased towards the hot side than a 2510 .

IMO less exhaust manifold pressure and more ignition advance = better result .

Cheers A .

Still looking for SR20 type GTSS cartridge (CHRA) number . Dont think anyone knows ...

Also when I asked Gary about his GCG Hi Flow for the RB20 I think I remember him saying it used an RB20 rather than an RB25 turbine housing - that would make a difference in response .

Edited by discopotato03

who has more information on the t518z turbo.

i also want the best trade off for response/torque (not just figures, but so i can feel it) and power (like everyone else) but i want around 230-250rwkw, if it means im going to lag from breakfast to asshole to get 250rwkw then idont want that much, but i would like at least 230rwkw. i want the car to feel that its pulling hard(usuable power) by 3k.

its a r32 gtst

from what i mentioned earlier would the smaller exhaust housing version of the t518z be the best option?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No it's fine. Heat sleeve is a thing. With oil running through it it is unlikely. Engine off heat soak can be a thing though. There is no way that you have a leak through the hose. That has pressure behind it and any small hole will turn into a large one in very short order. It is so much more likely to be leaking from the connection.
    • Really? That's piss weak. I didn't know they hobbled the shitboxen that badly. OK. So probs need to buy a flywheel too. But that's not too bad.
    • Hi all. I already posted some newbie-ish questions here and there but this will be my first "big" post. Last summer I went and fulfilled a kind of childhood wish, because I just thought I needed this experience in my life no matter what. The car I bought is a mildly modded 1995 BCNR33 Vspec. It was repainted to a metallic orange color all around and it had all windows reseated. Not so well done black respray in the trunk and a metallic black in the engine bay. From outside it looks very nice except for a minor paint error on the roof and the rear spats needing new adhesive tape. The inside is pretty clean and no broken plastics, missing or faded buttons. Even the adjustable mirrors and trunk antenna work like a charm. Despite a moderately long list of issues I don't (yet) regret buying this car. Most mechanical problems are just due to age, like worn rubbers here and there. The underside sadly has lots of corrosion, especially to the back. It looks like it either has been driven in the winter for a while or it lived near the saltwater in Japan, the rust is nothing terrible but it'll require to be looked after. Mostly panel gaps and all the mounted components underneath are a bit crusty, but I don't think anywhere has progressed so badly that there's going to be holes. Front right jacking rail is crushed and needs some care so it doesn't develop into a rust crater at some point. Worst part is definitely the strut towers. I thought they looked fine but after taking off the strut bar I noticed that it actually started bulging up on the passenger side. Probably would have passed on the car or negotiated down by some thousand Euros more if I had noticed this before buying, but here we are. Trunk area also has signs that there was a water leak to the interior once but nothing too crazy, I guess lots of Skylines had this at some point. As for the list of (known) issues, I'll try to make this compact. I hope the coloring is self explanatory. Mechanical: -Various busted or soon-to-be busted rubber bushings and ball joints. Will replace ball joints with OEM or better and bushings with polyurethane where possible. -Shaking steering wheel at above 80kph -downshift from 5th to 4th is a bit crunchy unless I rev-match, might just try to renew the shifter assembly, but it's not a priority issue -tailshaft centre bearing could use a replacement, is it worth going 1-piece tailshaft as it doesn't look too fresh all around? Chassis: -underbody corrosion on many spots and in hollow spaces, needs to be treated -corrosion on many bolts, hoses, lines, suspension components, subframes, will be treated when replacing of the bushings is needed as time goes on -strut tower top panels and some of the surrounding panels are rusty, so needs fixing. Will look into doing this with a buddy in the winter, otherwise bite the bullet and pay a professional -driver side door is misaligned to the body and needs to go a slight bit more inwards -both door windows are misaligned and have an airgap where the window meets the door at the B pillar -The Aerocatch latches for the bonnet have locks but no keys, need new keys. -driver side door window is kind of gritty and could use a polish -damaged jacking rails and front frame rails, from people lifting the car the wrong way, might have this fixed by a bodyshop Electrical: -Nismo tachometer is just bouncing and displaying nonsense, supposedly worked fine when the stock ECU was still in the car -An old Greddy boost controller sits on the dash which will be removed as it servers no purpose anymore. -a led segment rpm gauge is on the steering column, will probably also be (re-)moved once the Nismo tacho is working correctly -there was an attempt to make the sound system better by the previous owner but it was just inducing noise all the time, ripped out the amp and filters in the back, no music for now -trunk antenna goes up as long as the radio is on regardless of the mode, I want it to only rise if I choose Radio specifically or per switch -3rd brake light is a bit dimmer than the taillights but everything was converted to LEDs so mabye now it just seems dimmer? -reverse light flickers, have to test if that behavior changes when I fiddle with the gear stick. Hope I can get around changing the switch. -Left side taillight, blinker section has minor water intake and is humid after washing. Other side has a hole in it, probably for that exact reason. I'll probably reseal them entirely and plug the holes. Engine: -minor coolant drips on one or the other hose -rear turbo leaks oil onto the exhaust making the car essentially undriveable due to fire hazard -Oil filter relocation kit has an oil drip at the Dash lines, will probably make a new connection there and tighten real good and pray -throttle body assembly is slightly stuck for the first throttle pedal input after sitting for a while I'm always open to suggestions and advice from more experienced people, I'm sure half of this list is easily dealt with and just requires some time and effort to sort out properly. Once I have some proper pictures of the car I will post some in this thread, I just have to remember to take some more once I get the chance to. Will post updates when I have news on anything, I want to try to keep this thread as kind of a logbook as well. Ultimately my goal for this car is to just enjoy it. An engine rebuild is probably going to happen sometime as well, because it is old after all. It will never be fully new again, I am just not that rich. But I want it to look good, work well and not rot away while I drive it. I'm probably gonna spend a lot of money on this journey, hopefully not an unreasonable amount.
    • Hi all. So one of my major issues at the moment is my rear turbo leaking oil on the exhaust (and the general area). I presumed it was the rock hard super old drain hose, which it was not. So now I am in the midst of removing the rear turbo to get access to the banjo bolt that goes into the turbo oil feed. As one of the previous owners accidentally? tore off the OEM oil feed hardline that reaches behind the turbo, they ran braided lines directly to the turbo, presumably PTFE. Now, regardless if the line has rubber or teflon inside, is it just generally a bad idea to do this? I imagine these lines get quite hot being between the engine, turbo core and exhaust manifold. I suppose it's not too far fetched to think the line may even have melted. I'd love to hear your opinions on this as as the replacement OEM hardline piece is 130 per unit. And cutting open the currently mounted line to see inside will mean I just have to get a replacement either way. So far I am hoping maybe the bolt just loosened or (god forbid) they forgot one of the crush washers.
    • If it's a factory 20de manual probably has the 6 bolt flywheel in which case the det clutches won't work as they're 9 bolt.
×
×
  • Create New...