Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well this isn't really an audio question, but this is the closest forum I can find.

What is the smallest battery (ie CCA) I can run in the GTR. no audio or anything like that I just need enough power to start the car reliably.

eg I would like to use something small like ODYSSEY PC680MJT which is 680cca. Will this be good enough, too small or can I go even smaller :P

I will go dry cell because the car will only be driven every couple of weeks, and I would like to mount it in the cabin.

And a related wiring question - how many amps does the starter draw, and what other really high currents are drawn in the car (I am thinking fuel pump at around 30A would be next biggest?) How many amps does the standard alternator put out.

This is for the custom wiring etc in a race car.

You can use much smaller batteries(motorbike batteries etc), but they will only last a few cranks.

Price to pay for the weight saving.

Once the car is running, the alternator supplies all power to various pieces, so size of battery once running is non issue.

I have a 365 CCA Deka. Works fine. It is an ETX30L It has 26AH

You can get smaller batteries. The main issue is the weight rather than the CCA. A low compression 2.6 isn't hard to turn over.

Duncan, just be careful with the cranking amps listed for dry cells. Some of them use measures other than CCA. Which usually give a higher number. So just make sure you compare apples with apples.

Oh and for info it is in the boot of my R32 & has a Nismo fuel pump making lots of noise. Handles track days etc fine.

Edited by djr81

Ok thanks guys looks like I will go with a 680 copy.

$180 over here if anyone else is looking

http://allpurposebatteries.com.au/shop/pro...;products_id=34

anyone got more info on my other questions? what does the starter and other high current thingies draw?

  • 2 weeks later...
anyone got more info on my other questions? what does the starter and other high current thingies draw?

starter motors draw volts not amps, dummy.. :D

;):)

I'd guess it would be in the region of 100-150 amps. You could get away with a smaller battery for cranking, the reason why we put 550CCA batteries in is for standby current draw (car alarms etc, if you leave the car sitting for 3 weeks) and the motor not starting first go. If using a smaller battery I would put an isolator switch in so you can turn everything off when the car's not being used. A good idea to have one of those in a race car anyway.

As a rough guide for fuses, wiring etc I would follow what the standard loom uses unless you've modified something (car manufacturers are penny-pinchers after all), by the looks of things the main battery wires are 8G and I would not be going any smaller than that (8G is rated for 50A continuous draw). My fuel pump fuse is 15A, and the spec on a Bosch 044 is 12V / 13 amps so the standard wiring would only just handle it. As general wiring practice, the current capacity of the wiring must be higher than the fuse that's installed. If you don't follow this advice I will point and laugh when you get an electrical fault and your wiring melts before the fuse does :)

lol good point!

8G doesn't seem that big for the starter, but hey if thats what nissan think its good enough for me. from looking at the main loom its only starter/alternator/battery that run beefy cables. Looks like nothing else draws more than 20a like fuel pumps.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...