Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Im just about to install an ATI harmonic balancer on my RB26, and i was flicking through my engine (workshop) manual and discovered that there were two vastly different torque recommendations for the 30mm crank bolt.

There is an exploded view diagram of the RB26, and it has 446 - 544Nm (45.5 - 55.5Kg-m) with an arrow pointing to the crank bolt. However, when you read through the step by step instructions, it says "Tightening torque: 142 - 152Nm (14.5 - 15.5Kg-m)" in relation to the crank bolt.

My manual also has the instructions for the RB20 and RB25, and the recommended tightening torques are all 142 - 152Nm.

I cant see why the torque for the Rb26 should be any different, let alone almost 3.5 times that of the other engines. Its a massive amount of torque; that means you've gotta apply about 27Kg of load on the end of a torque wrench with a two meter handle!

Im wondering if its a typo in the manual, and the correct torque is the lesser of the two. If anyone could shed some light on this it would be appreciated; especially those who have had experience in installing these balancers on RB engines. Its a pretty important topic i reckon, as its an engine destroying problem if anything fails down there.

I wish i could supply some pics, but if anyone else has a manual could you verify this for all of us. I got my manual off a forum member who sold me a disk; i cant see why i wouldnt have originated from a Nissan maunual.

Thanks,

Shaun.

Edited by Shaun
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/226987-correct-torque-for-rb26-crank-bolt/
Share on other sites

Yeah, thats the same diagram as mine. You'll notice that in subsequent pages it recommends the 142-152Nm. It would be good to clear this up, as im a bit nervous about putting that much torque on the bolt.

Ive heard that you've gotta put the car in 5th and have someone with their foot hard on the brake, then use a stupid long handle to get the 500Nm. Apparently it sounds like the gearbox is going to let go under the load!

We need some engine builders to shed some light.

Shaun.

Edited by Shaun

Permanent Threadlocker + big breaker bar and hang off it is how I've always done it.

I drop mine in fourth gear with the hand brake on; never had issues with it moving.

I've always figured 4th would be the strongest gear 1:1; Don't like the idea of forcing 5th even though I'm probably only able to get 200-250nm in to it and no doubt the motor makes more at peak torque.

the last time i took the bolt out of my rb26 when i did the timing belt, it was on so fkn tight... ridicuous..

i put it back on and tightened to 156nm.... and then when the turbo popped and killed the motor... i STILL couldnt undo the bastard! lol

its like it tightened itself!

Why no threadlocker?

Doing mine up to basically as tight as I can. 200nm or so with thread locker its fairly easy to remove with a normal breaker bar.

Onyl reason I've used threadlocker is every crank bolt I've pulled has had some on it. Be it from factory I'm unsure; Multiple RB30e, 2 x rb20det's. Given the age I'd say they have all been apart prior.

im an engine builder and mechanic by trade

500nm+ is very wrong...

u would snap the bolt or the destroy the thread.. 142-152nm sounds about right and i wouldnt use threadlocker either

Im with you mate. Over 500Nm just sounds too much. I dont think my 350Kw engine even makes 500Nm of torque. Imagine if you snapped or stripped the bolt inside the crank! What a fcuking nightmare!

As for undoing it, ive heard that you can use a 300mm breaker bar and rest the handle on the radiator support, then crank the car (with injectors disconnected or something like that), so that the engine turns but the bolt doesnt. Do you think thats dodgy?

Anyone else with opinions or experience?

Shaun.

I would invest in a decent impact gun and compressor guys. You will end up using it for lots of other jobs so its worth it

That way you can even have the car in neutral and crack a bastard tight crank pulley bolt without the engine turning one bit. When it comes to tightening just a few seconds with the gun and its all done. Should always double check it with a breaker to be sure however.

I was thinking of doing it this way for my build. what PSI would you set on compressor? also would you use a torque wrench to test the bolt afterwards?

threadlocker?

cheers

rob

I would invest in a decent impact gun and compressor guys. You will end up using it for lots of other jobs so its worth it

That way you can even have the car in neutral and crack a bastard tight crank pulley bolt without the engine turning one bit. When it comes to tightening just a few seconds with the gun and its all done. Should always double check it with a breaker to be sure however.

  • Like 1

there will not be many regular impact wrenches that can deliver 500Nm. some people use a special gun with a reduction gear to get the required torque. as for whether or not it's correct, I'm not 100%, but lots of people that I know, who are 'in the know' tell me it is. I do also know I've seen a fair few RB26 balancer bolts come loose, no doubt they were not tightened 'enough'. mine has been one of them. :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks for your insight, it being basically useless will impact my decision for sure. I thought it may help the engine breath better I guess. But then again, I have also been told that tuning an RB20DE is also not worth it. Exactly, we follow EU Regulations. There is a bit more leeway on older vehicles. My Porsche 924 came without a cat from factory and managed to pass, they still mentioned that I have quite high emissions on it though.
    • My apologies, I stand corrected. Thanks for registering to mention this! And thank you for actually reaching out to the council to clarify. This is the sensible thing to do and the opposite of what I was alluding you were doing. I may have seen too much outrage and hate being fueled on the internet and it has made me a somewhat cynical old man. Sometimes it is easy to forget that there are real people behind websites and accounts. In my defence, CarExpert and CarExplore do read quite similarly at a glance. I shall try and do better in the future. (Please stick around to get the latest scoops on dealing with old Nissan shitboxes )
    • Don't bother. The poor little RB20 doesn't make enough gas flow to challenge the flow capabilities of even the littlest cat, and you won't make any extra power, and all you'll do it soot up your rear bumper. Plus....is Malta not runing under Euro regs?
    • Hey Daniel, sorry to hear that and thanks for posting up for us at a really hard time I only knew SmoothLine through the forums, we never met as we are based in different states, but when he was most active on here he was quite a while back so not many of the current crowd might remember him. I am pretty sure he was active in the Queensland SQU club but that is defunct now too (times are changing and we are all getting older). Farewell SmoothLine!    
    • Turns out depending on whether the car was equipped with TCS or not there are different signals coming to the dash, meaning there are different speedo clusters.  Wired in a speedo calibrator box from aliexpress and now works fine. 
×
×
  • Create New...