Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys i got two days till my car goes in for a turbo rebuild cuz the ceramic wheel has shit itsself they tell me there going to put a steel one in there and it will cost around $700 - $800. would i be better off just buying a new turbo for that price. oh by the way its the original turbo for a gts-t r33 1993 skyline. and is it easy to fit a new one myself. i am an engineer and ive done most of the mods myself but unsure if its safe enough for me to fit myself.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/227029-need-new-turbo/
Share on other sites

Mate if you know how a turbo works and try to keep some kind of record of how you take everything off you will be fine.

Twin turbo is a bit different and it would help if you had a mate, and some ramps, if i had tools a ramp and mate at my disposal i would def do it my self but its up to you, you cant really stuff it up unless you really screw up the oil feed and oil return lines. or similar

800 for a rebuilt turbo thats damn cheap and doesnt really sound like a good thing mate, you might want to look into this "rebuilt turbo" a little more.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/227029-need-new-turbo/#findComment-3997162
Share on other sites

Dont just go for a cheap turbo as 1 cheap turbo that blows can turn into 4 cheap turbos that blow.

I am not the biggest fan of hi flows/rebuilds as many blow although more are fine then ones that blow.

I believe companies such as garret spend a lot more money on there testing and engineering then what a lot of other companies that rebuild cheap turbos do.

Could be wrong but thats the way i see it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/227029-need-new-turbo/#findComment-3998470
Share on other sites

For a one out one in the GCG Hi Flow is hard to beat and a known quantity .

So many people try bush bearing hybrids and by the time its acted up and been removed and repaired they haven't spent any less money .

Currently waiting to see the results of one on a fresh 25 with headwork/poncams/VG30 housing and GReady copy inlet manifold .

Should be very impressive , cheers A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/227029-need-new-turbo/#findComment-4002237
Share on other sites

$800 is too cheap for high flow.. something not right there

be paying at least $1500 for bush/journal bearing

and $2000 mark if ball-bearing

if i read it right he is not going a hi flow, just a rebuild with a steel exhaust wheel.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/227029-need-new-turbo/#findComment-4003751
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...