Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just need to work out which lines need to be blocked and which I need to use, can someone tell me what each of the following do?

1) two small air fittings coming off the top piece of the inlet manifold?

2) two large fittings coming down from the top piece of the inlet manifold with rubber hoses attached?

3) a short piece of rubber hose coming out the back of the water way (bottom piece of inlet manifold)?

4) smaller barb thats attached to block near thermostat? (bigger barb goes to heater).

5) opposite side of block, for turbo water return, do I use top hole or bottom hole (located towards back of block)?

Thanks people.

post-16618-1215937045_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/227936-what-do-these-lines-do/
Share on other sites

Just need to work out which lines need to be blocked and which I need to use, can someone tell me what each of the following do?

1) two small air fittings coming off the top piece of the inlet manifold?

2) two large fittings coming down from the top piece of the inlet manifold with rubber hoses attached?

3) a short piece of rubber hose coming out the back of the water way (bottom piece of inlet manifold)?

4) smaller barb thats attached to block near thermostat? (bigger barb goes to heater).

5) opposite side of block, for turbo water return, do I use top hole or bottom hole (located towards back of block)?

Thanks people.

1, front is for FPR back is for standard boost gauge

2, for that big f**k off thing thats under the standard plenum.. to tired to think of its name

3, water return that runs around the back of the head (there is also one running to the front) make sure you replace that bloody piece of hose with a nice new quaility silicon item.. they are an absolute bitch to change while in the car.

4, i cant remember i'll have a look sometime tomorow

5, get a picture of it.. i have a feeling your talking about the water feed tho

also little bit more info on wat your tryin to setup could help possibly

RB30/26 engine upgrade using power FC d-jetro and stock GTR loom. T04z trust turbo kit.

So from whats been said:

1) FPR and boost gauge

2) Block off

3) Water return from turbo (can use either front or back as in attached pic but front would be better so less hot water is going past intake manifold).

4) Block off or below?

5) Water to turbo top one, block the bottom one

Also block the other small barb on passenger side rear of block or attach back to 4 so when the heater switch is turned off the water runs back to the engine side of thermostat???

post-16618-1215995242_thumb.jpg

post-16618-1215995276_thumb.jpg

Edited by =premo=

4 is coolant feed to the oil cooler I am pretty sure. which you dont need with your oil relocation. it has a return somewhere too

also, I am pretty sure you need to join and not block off 2. It is for balancing pressure across the manifold due to the multiple throttles

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...