Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Impressive the yanks can now build car which actually handles quite well and has a lot of power to boot. I dare say though that the GTR could have driven home without a pit stop at the servo, where as the vette probably was running on fumes by the time it reached the front gate on the burger ring track.

lol you dolt. I bet you that corvette probably gets better fuel economy than the GTR.

The new 6 litre v8 we get here is more fuel efficent than most shitty skylines out there.

whats the top speed of the new gtr?

cause the vette got near 3 hundred befor he changed into 6th? wtf why do they need to go so fast?

maybe to make up for there lack of conering ability.

but they have still made a car with a lot more power and a lot less weight. win win

if you look at the other cars on that list above the skyline is a underpowered very heavy attempt at a supercar.

I'd be curious to know if both cars left from a standing start, there'd be 3 seconds difference right there.

Credit where it's due, GM are building some cars that handle pretty nicely, and that lap was a pretty awesome effort from that driver. Looks like a lot of fun to drive.

apparently the r33 gtr v spec hits the torque split more aggressive than the r32 and the aerodynamics was improved!

the zr1 is impressive, it shows the old style of a good chassis front engine rear wheel drive is always gonna be the best balance! although it's beaten the gtr but i don't feel like the best has been brought out of the gtr from watching all the videos of it! the zr1 out of all the american cars is a great cornering machine because the corvette had european influences, the person who designed the platform was a british fellow

hopefully we see a dog fight between these 2 cars in the future! it'll be like old school engineering vs technology! oh and i also read a thread about the ceo of honda saying the nsx has to be faster than the gtr, would love to see that as well

Edited by nos man
Definitely gutsy.. :D Would be really good to see the same driver in both cars as it looked like the vette was pushed just so much harder but maybe its just the combination of rwd + more power. :(

yeah the GTR definitely looked smoother around a few of those corners.........almost a Sunday drive in comparison on a couple of corners :(

I think the average driver would be quicker in the GTR than the Vette around crappy circuits like lalla but as said before, probably no comparison in the straights.

Does anyone have the 60 ft & 1/4 mile figures on the Vette....couldn't be stuffed searching?

yeah the GTR definitely looked smoother around a few of those corners.........almost a Sunday drive in comparison on a couple of corners :D

I think the average driver would be quicker in the GTR than the Vette around crappy circuits like lalla but as said before, probably no comparison in the straights.

Does anyone have the 60 ft & 1/4 mile figures on the Vette....couldn't be stuffed searching?

Here ya go Pete

SpecificationsEstimated

  • Displacement: V8 6.2 L (378.3 cu in)
  • Horsepower: 638 bhp (476 kW) at 6500 rpm
  • Torque: 604 ft·lbf (819 N·m)
  • Bore: 103.25 mm (4.065 in)
  • Stroke: 92.0 mm (3.62 in)
  • Compression: 9.9:1
  • Supercharger maximum boost: 10.5 psi (72 kPa)
  • Red line: 7100 rpm
  • Clutch: 260 mm (10 in)
  • 1st gear ratio: 2.29
  • 1st gear top speed: 64 mph (103 km/h)
  • 6th gear ratio: 0.67
  • Wheel size front: 19 in (480 mm) diameter by 10 in (250 mm) width
  • Wheel size rear: 20 in (510 mm) diameter by 12 in (300 mm) width
  • Tire size front: 285/30R-19
  • Tire size rear: 335/25R-20
  • Brakes front: Brembo 15.5 in (390 mm)
  • Brakes rear: Brembo 15.0 in (380 mm)
  • Front/rear balance: 52/48
  • Curb weight: estimated 3,300 lb (1,500 kg)
  • 0-60 mph (97 km/h): 3.4 sec
  • Top speed: 205 mph (330 km/h)
  • Production: 2000 units per year (estimated)
  • Price: US$105,000 to US$115,000

I wouldn't mind seeing both vids side by side from the same starting point, be a very interesting watch to see what car dominates in what sections

yeah me too, just like the R35 & Zonda video.....at least then you get to see where and when the Vette starts to really pull away.

I like some of those figures Damo........under 4 sec 0-100kph, massive brakes, massive rubber, much lighter car and a blower too!!

I'd like the R35 for weekends and the Vette as my daily please :D

Both cars will be awesome in the new gran turismo haha :D

Yeah Corvette is a very impressive machine! 19x10 and 20x12 standard rims :( plenty of grip and stop, and plenty of go! I wonder what suspension its running.

just answering my own question:

Ride control

The name of the ride control system is Magnetic Selective Ride Control (MSRC). MSRC is provided by Delphi. The system uses two modes of control: Tour and Sport.

The system offers standing start launch modifications. When launching the ZR1 from a standing start, the shocks are completely softened on launch and stiffened on rebound. The softened shocks on launch aid the ZR1 by allowing the center of gravity to shift. The ride control standing launch modifications are designed to minimize bounce.

Edited by Damo_R34

doesn't the vette run ancient suspension or something?

oh another thing i realised about the differences of the gtr and vette! imagine a tuning battle of both cars? which one would have more potential to go further?

doesn't the vette run ancient suspension or something?

oh another thing i realised about the differences of the gtr and vette! imagine a tuning battle of both cars? which one would have more potential to go further?

And you're point is?

If an american company using suspension design from 70 years ago can beat the japanese using 21st century technology it just makes me lol.

And that corvette looks a lot more fun to drive than the skyline.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • FWIW a lot of the local owners that do a big build tend to have cars that are perpetually broken. 
    • I just got this system but haven’t installed yet I got a Moroso sealed box (defect reasons) which will be set up same as their pic The quality is high grade, the correspondence I had with the owner (former head designer for Rockford Fosgate) was unbelievable, guiding me with what I needed. Even told me not to buy some things as it could be sorted in a different way at his loss. Just a bit of a bite with the exchange rate and don’t purchase gear in 1 hit that goes over $1,000 au, lol I forgot!  
    • Thanks mate for that reply. Very helpful.    it’s a 2022 400R so would most likely lose those features as you say.     I did a quick compare of a rv37 nav and heading for sale in Japan to q50 model. I’ll pop pics below. Seems  Japan spec head into top, nav unit second below it   below pic Q50 aud delivered     differences seem to be Aus delivered has a different plug top left hand side of head unit- not sure what and where it goes.   and nav unit Japanese tv37 had an extra plug put    Again I’m really not sure what each of these differences mean!       the actual plugs on a v37 and q50 screens look identical on both screens… pics below for comparing. (One screen was is a us delivered one) but should be same gps signals etc as Australia.    If it were as simple as swapping a nav unit from q50 aud delivered im interested -just want to figure out what the missing plug is for before spending big $ on a second hand part for it to not work, and I guess with the head unit, if the band expander does the job (I got a 20mHz so should get the range I’m after) so should narrow my issue down to nav unit only.  I’d love to know what the extra cable on rv37 does and if I eliminate that part what it’ll do to the setup,    and also, if I can figure out what that head unit plug difference is, what does that cable do and where does it got can it be altered or re-plugged?! Excuse my ignorance what is ACP/AA, what does that stand for? (Apple car play? Android air play)? so If I swapped head units to save using a band expander, I’d likely lose those better features to have an oem Unit operational. Better to use a band expander and retain AirPlay options and newer version of head unit     provably best to band expand it, and focus on the nav unit. th isn’t  a big deal/ would be cool to have it working  from what I can tel we use a PAL Signal and Japan uses a NTSC signal  I don’t know if there’s a co better or if the screen only reads NTSC, or if it’s the tv module that needs replacing… no big deal don’t need it but more of a curiosity thing on that!   Thanks for the info re tyre sensors, helpful and great to know.  I was reading the online manual off Japan website and it seemed to make it sound more confusing than it is  I guess a rim replacement would require the sensors to be moved to a new rim to carry that option over?!     Thanks for the info regarding diagnostic mode. I appreciate your help mate. Trying to brainstorm here to find a solution to get as much gadgets as I can working! I plan to get my local Nissan tech to have a look too who used to be at an Infiniti dealer back in the day to see if any thing they have or idea can find a soliton. But hoping anyone here has gone down the same route to make life easier!!   i guess identifying the cable/plug differences and what they do would be a great way of finding out if the units are transferable    thanks again 
    • No idea about the remote start part. If the V37 nav is anything like other Nissan JDM vehicles, you can't get the factory Japanese nav working in australia, a card from a different car almost certainly won't work, those cards are usually matched to the serial number of the DCU.  You could be possibly swap out the components from a AuDM Q50 to get it working, but if this is a new model (2021+) 400R, then you will lose the newer features like ACP/AA.  That said, if you have ACP/AA, just use google maps.. I assume a band expander would be required to get the local radio stations, but don't forget the Japanese FM band is narrower than ours, so you still might not be able to receive all Australian stations. I can't see any reason the tyre pressure sensors won't work here, there is the sensor unit inside the rim and the receiver nearby in the wheel well.  I have never had to change the batteries on my 2015 Q50, so I assume they last quite a while.  A straight battery change shouldn't need them to be re-registered as they are the same unit, that should only be required if you replace a sensor with a new one.   Word of warning, if you ever go into the 'secret' diagnostics mode on the main screen, DO NOT EVER do a 'reset' in this menu, it will erase all of your model specific data in the DCU and you will need a trip to a dealer to re-program it all, which would be particularly painful being an import.  This applies to the AuDM Q50 too.
    • There is a known issue with the mix door motor on the Q50 which causes these symptoms, not sure if it is common on the Y51 though.
×
×
  • Create New...