Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Given my car basically was a Z Tune spec wise already all I needed to do was put a kit on it.

It was going to cost me a LOT more to down-grade to an N1 than what this is (the major reason why I'm doing it since my newbness isn't going to make me all that fast straight up).

But we can be sure some Porka and EVO people are going t have a cry about it too which will be fun :banana:

I saw a genuine 400R up at auction a couple of months ago. now that would be cool for rally and the 2.8 and 400ps wouldn't hurt. it's the 33 to have. this particular one may have been a bit nice to race though. I can tell you if I'd had the money at the time I would have bought it. Grade 5A (unheard of generally for cars that old). 5,000 odd kms. would have been a nice collectors piece.

post-3621-1223600149_thumb.jpg

I am not 100% sure how this applies to the CAMS rally or AASA rules, but in CAMS circuit racing to enter as something the car has to be in that exact spec.

ie your chassis does not have to be a real z tune, but every part of the car has to be changed to z tune spec.

In the case of my car in circuit racing it is a 91 gtr running as a 32 Vspec2 n1 which means it must run the bigger brakes, n1 turbos, no rear wiper, factory oil cooler, aero additions (nostrils, rear lip spoiler, sidepods) etc etc. Obviously people are a little liberal with those rules (eg I have no rear wiper but not an n1 rear windscreen with no wiper hole), but in theory it should all be genuine.

Would be interesting to get confirmation from Stuart how closely this is followed in tarmac rally.

I saw a genuine 400R up at auction a couple of months ago. now that would be cool for rally and the 2.8 and 400ps wouldn't hurt. it's the 33 to have. this particular one may have been a bit nice to race though. I can tell you if I'd had the money at the time I would have bought it. Grade 5A (unheard of generally for cars that old). 5,000 odd kms. would have been a nice collectors piece.

post-3621-1223600149_thumb.jpg

Wow! That's an exceptional R33! Amazing rating considering it's age hey :)

Any idea what that went for Baron? Gotta be rare as hen's teeth.

powerplay had 2 for sale a while ago. if i had the money i'd quite happly buy a 400r and gut it for racing. what's the tuning potential of a 400r? (injector size, afms, zorst...) the extra torque of the 2.8 would be good for rallys though.

Replica vehicles are required to be mechanically identical to the model they are representing aside from where the regulations lay down a tolerance for modification. There is room for movement within the tarmac rally world where the component that is wrong isn't performance enhancing and there is a plan to correct the problem if it's of significance.

Eg. I used to enter my R32 V-Spec II as an N1, but didn't put the nostrils on it cause I don't like the look of them and left my rear wiper on cause I couldn't be arsed taking it off.

Obviously the wiper and support systems weighed more than not having one and the intercooler isn't as efficient without the nostrils so logic says my car is at a mechanical disadvantage which is Ok if the organisers agree.

Wow! That's an exceptional R33! Amazing rating considering it's age hey :)

Any idea what that went for Baron? Gotta be rare as hen's teeth.

I can't remember exactly, but my hazy brain is telling me it was around 5m yen = $50K at the time. quite good buying for one in that original condition.

another pic. :D

400r1mo5.jpg

I saw a genuine 400R up at auction a couple of months ago. now that would be cool for rally and the 2.8 and 400ps wouldn't hurt. it's the 33 to have. this particular one may have been a bit nice to race though. I can tell you if I'd had the money at the time I would have bought it. Grade 5A (unheard of generally for cars that old). 5,000 odd kms. would have been a nice collectors piece.

post-3621-1223600149_thumb.jpg

Awesome stuff, I'd love to own that. They're my favourite GT-R, next to a Z-tune of course :P

.....There is room for movement within the tarmac rally world where the component that is wrong isn't performance enhancing and there is a plan to correct the problem if it's of significance.

excellent...and very practical approach.

in the production car class there is a real fight against replica spec cars, and even moves to ban them every now and then (ie I would have to find an actual vspec2 n1 vin chassis). if they knew my rear window should not have a wiper hole I would be disqualified and all points forfeited. all from the falcadore boys who are upset that

a. their homolgation specials are only a little less shit house than their base models

b. a 20yo datsun can still match or even beat their 2008 spec cars

the practical approach is thanks to targa tasmania as the market leader trying to be client focused. it was a different story five years ago.

that anal approach shits me... nothing like the small minded car club approach to the world of motorsport!

four digit numbers are application numbers, they will swap to three digit once confirmed as invited entries this month.

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
×
×
  • Create New...