Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im sellin mine

Selling my N/a r33 :)

1994 R33 GTS

Wine Red

Automatic

56,000k

Rego til May next year

Nizmo Side skirts

Extractors

Hi-Flow Cat

Stainless steel Exhaust from cat back (mounted sideways) :)

$13500 with stereo

$12500 with out...

PM ME or

contact me on [email protected] :)

or contact Joel on 0412416778

but im in melb

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/22820-r33-na-gts25/#findComment-504091
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

regrettably and in all honesty, if you're talking about an R33 GTS (RB20E engine) then I'd have to say they're pretty gutless. I know, I owned one for a couple of years. Unfortunately, a 2 litre single cam N/A engine putting out 130PS isn't going to win you many races, especially not in a car as heavy as an R33. But don't get me wrong, it is still a Skyline and it is an great all round car. I really hated giving up my old GTS, the only reason I did was to get an R34.

Now, the R33 GTS25 (RB25DE) is a different matter - a lot more power and potential.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/22820-r33-na-gts25/#findComment-528369
Share on other sites

the GTS25 is great mate, they arent gutless, compared to other NA cars they are awesome. Its a choice man, either NA or turbo, if u want to enter the turbo world well then of course u can expect performance (im talkin skylines) there are heaps of turbo cars an NA skyline kickass over though

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/22820-r33-na-gts25/#findComment-529590
Share on other sites

RB25DE 1993

complianced 3months back

VERY clean inside and out

done 93k

serviced once a month

2.5" kakimoto cat-back exhaust syst.

m-spech front bar

new brakes

new tyres

kenwood head-deck

new remote allarm/imob

15" rims...

silver over gun metal grey

tinted lights (rekon clear look shit)

p/m offers...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/22820-r33-na-gts25/#findComment-531591
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...