Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey, guys !

I want to confirm one thing. I plan to buy a gt2860rs turbo from one place. And I found a shagged hks 2530 turbo. I plan to use its rear housing.

So can I unbolt the t25 rear housing from gt2860rs and get the 2530 one on there ? Do I have to balance that thing ?

Or I can't do this myself and have to get some turbo shop to do it ?

Thanks!

You can change the housings easy and being both HKS should line up no problem. It won't affect the balance, but I'm not sure about the fan sizes vs the housing sizes.

Someone else will answer that better than I can.

Ears burn .

Yes the DP GT2860RS turbo and the HKS GT2530 use the same turbine so the turbine housings should be interchangeable .

The GT2860Rs and 2530 are very similar cartridges , if anything the RS turbo may have a slightly more modern compressor wheel . Both are 60.1mm OD compressor wheels but the inducers are fractionally different as are their trims .

From memory the 2530's compressor is 63 trim with ~ 47.7mm inducer where the 28RS is ~ 47.4mm and 62T .

Double check your GT2860RS's ID tag numbers because Garrett make two very similar cartridges (CHRA) with the real disco one being 446179-66 and the GTR upgrade version being 446179-51 from turbo assembly number 707160-5 .

The -51 CHRA also uses a 60.1mm 62 trim compressor but its exducer tip height is less than the -66 versions wheel .

If your Disco Potato Turbo is an original unmolested one it should have had a 0.86 A/R T28 (T25 same) flanged GT28 turbine housing . Some people wuzzed out and ordered the smaller ratio T28 flanged 0.64 housing , sadly (and stupidly) HKS only had their T3 flanged GT28 turbine housing made in 0.64 A/R .

I don't have my bibles with me ATM but I think the 2530's cartridge number is 446179-21 .

Confirm details tomorrow , cheers A .

BTW GT2860RS turbo part no is 739548-1 .

Edited by discopotato03

So tell me one thing, disco. What garrett p/n should I order to get the right gt28rs to fit inside hks .64ar housing ? I think its that .64version, right ?

And if I assemble it by myself, will I have any issues down the road ? Because, there is this guy who assembles turbos and he says, that they should be balanced once assembled. Cartridge balanced, and 2 housings balanced with the cartridge.

Really hope I can get some more info on my dilemma.

Here are the pics of the RB specific HKS2530 I've found on the internet. And you can see the cartridge tag pretty clearly.

What I'm thinking is if I would be able to slot the gt2860rs cartridge inside ? Or maybe there is a Garrett alternative available already ?

Thanks!

post-29228-1216813868_thumb.jpg

post-29228-1216813880_thumb.jpg

Edited by robots

Well the theory being that both the "GT2530" and GT2860RS are both GT2860R cartridges they should interchange in any turbine housing intended for the generic GT25BB style center section - provided they are profile machined for the same turbine family/trim .

I can almost see the confused looks over this GT25/GT28 terminology but there is an answer .

HKS got into the BB scene early and at that stage all the small turbine turbos were called GT25xx .

Going back a few years Garrett changed their turbo description system in an attemp to avoid confusion but the new system is not perfect and there is also the old and new systems to wade through .

At this stage most people consider the 54mm turbine size to be GT25 and the 60.1mm one to be GT28 .

The actual centre section meaning bearing housing and bearing pack is said to be the generic "GT25 BB" sized center section and covers most of the ball bearing turbo range from smallest (GT2554R) up to largest (GT3582R) , basically the guts excepting the wheels/compressor backplate/both housings is the same .

I did once read that there was a very slight difference on the depth of the step or register where early GT3037's located in their exhaust housings but it's the only example I can think of that any variation ever existed . The fix was a very simple lathe operation so not a biggie . I read it years ago on some US board .

OT again , the 60.1mm compressors is the "60" part of GT2860R or RS , the "30" part of GT2530 I understand means 60.1mm GT30 series compressor (don't confuse with the GT30 turbine family) .

Old speak - GT2530 means "GT25" 53.85mm NS111 turbine in 76T + GT30 compressor in 63T .

New speak - GT2860R means "GT28" 53.85mm NS111 turbine in 76T + 60.1mm comp in 60/62/63T .

So a GT2860RS cartridge should go straight into a 2530's turbine housing , from memory 2530's (except the KAi) version used the same type of comp housing (T04B 0.60 A/R) as a GT2860RS if intended for an RB engine app . The snout was machined off and a 4 bolt flanged adapter tube was fitted to the front to get its barb size down to the same as an RB20/25 turbo so std inlet plumbing fitted .

Capable turbo mobs or a machinist could sort this one out for you , cheers A .

If you don't go with the shagged 2530 let me know , I could use some bits off it if the price is realistic .

Cheers .

Here is the best pic of the serial number i have of my 2530 Kai if its of any use.

post-27754-1216868499_thumb.jpg

post-27754-1216868513_thumb.jpg

You may have some difficulty finding a gasket to match, maybe GCG??

Just a pic of the flange on the dump pipe that came with it and the turbo flange it mates up to if its of any interest.

post-27754-1216868854_thumb.jpg

post-27754-1216868870_thumb.jpg

what sort of power are we looking at by using the disco potato with the .64 as opposed to the .84 rear? can i get a i.d number on both please disco?

Sorry to hijack thread robots..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
    • Holy hell! That is absolutely stunning! Great work!!!
×
×
  • Create New...