Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a Piggy Back, an SAFC II Apexi Air to Fuel ratio Computer but I was wondering if it might be better to just get a fuel pressure regulator and set it up instead? The SAFC you have to splice shit and connect it, along with getting it professionally tuned. Then you have to keep it locked and it adds more light to the cockpit. I was just wondering since I am overfueling if it would be okay just to go the other route and save money. Maybe there is a certain one that you guys may suggest even (a certain Fuel Pressure Regulator), and thus not saving me money at all. I would still love to hear your imput.

Thanks,

Austin

EDIT:

RB25DET S2

Mods =

FMIC

HKS Super Induction Kit

AEM Boost Controller (set on off)

Problems =

Black Smoke out Exaust

Bogging Down at 3k RPM when boost throttle applied

Fuel cut (sometimes) at top range in 5th gear

Edited by AKW
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/228481-apexi-safc-ii-versus-fpr/
Share on other sites

Safc 2 for sure, it can correct the mixtures up top to stop it running rich and you will make more power.Fpr is only really needed if you want to bump the pressure of the rail, if your close to maxing stock injectors and want to bump boost into it cheaply, so its not really needed in your application.

Safcs are easy to hook up:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes, but it's not as easy as pulling a fuse on anything other than an R32. There's a routine you have to do, involving disconnecting a loom plug and bleeding down the preload.
    • A question for tuning awd, is it possible to disable the AWD? The stagea is an EA/T AWD, Toshi had said on a GTR, he was able to disable it and make it 2wd. Just wanted to double check if this was possible
    • Whoa, that's a name I've not see for a long time! Sorry to hear about the engine / turbo damage.  Fwiw with any engine problems it often really a case of just seeing what happens when it's apart, ymmv - I wouldn't rule out the possibility that the damage isn't even from the turbo failure, or possibly from a combination.  The airflow between cylinders isn't dead even, injectors can go off over time as well, with the turbos overboosting if you didn't have upgraded fuel system there could have possibly been a bit of leaning out - stock triggering is often a bit unreliable by this age too.  Basically its an old engine and a few things could have been going on, and you won't know how much work is needed until the engine is apart.  
    • I'm just shocked there's a euro driver on our roads who is thinking of other road users and not attempting to blind everyone. I wonder if Prank uses his indicator too...
    • Its hard to tell really. The Q50 owner's forum talks about it a lot and has quite a few people directly affected, but no idea what % of cars sold actually had the block replaced. Also, there seem to be 2 distinct issues which both get diagnosed by Infiniti as requiring a block replacement (no wonder they are going broke) 1. "Porous block" where coolant mixes with oil through thin or poorly cast parts of the block 2. Head coolant gallery plugs not sealing. If I was noticing engine coolant loss I'd start with cooling system pressure test (as always) and then I'd pull the cam covers and reseal the coolant gallery plugs on both side before worrying about a potentially porous block.  If neither of those did the trick it would be put in a second hand engine out of japan; I haven't checked pricing but I'm sure there are plenty around by now as they've been in production 10+ years
×
×
  • Create New...