Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nah I don't wanna drive yours to see the handling, just the 30DET (and do a burnout, jump out the door and leg it)

You don't know where I live right?

Paul, $1200

How bout I take you for a ride.. I mean.. drive :D

*shrug* stock for stock a 33 is a better prospect than a 32 but for minimal mods I believe a 32 is better (upgrade parts off later skylines to be used). For massive mods then it comes down to personal preference, I know I'd prefer to waste heaps of money on a 32gtst, but that's just me :starwars:

Unless its a GTR

32 loses in every department

This aint a war its a slaughter!

Lucky I have a 32R then... and im sure Bubba's 25/30 will pwn all.

We haz teh power & teh good looks, the 33 is the ugly fat girl with a nice personality.

No 33 vs. 32 war, its a slaughter :(

Indeed it shall! Went for a ride in an interesting car last night Tristran.. you would like :(

Can't spill too many details coz it's secret squirrel shit, but if you're up for a random spontaneous cruise this weekend, let me know :P

People who heavily modify there car like bubba i give respect

but were talkin 33 vs 32 without any drastic changes (eg engine conversions)

so yes 33 > 32 no debate! and.... 32 isnt hawt either, old interior, ghey ass bonnet bend (unless GTR) not to mention piss weak

Yeah! I gotz rezpekt y0! :P

I find the 32gtst to be a good starter as far as getting into modding cars go. Lots of cheap upgrades off the newer skylines such as 25 turbo, 33 brakes etc. Then you get into motors out of the newer skylines, I opted for a different route and built something that doesn't come standard in any car :D

Indeed it shall! Went for a ride in an interesting car last night Tristran.. you would like :laugh:

Can't spill too many details coz it's secret squirrel shit, but if you're up for a random spontaneous cruise this weekend, let me know :D

so mikes got the 32 going? ;)

People who heavily modify there car like bubba i give respect

but were talkin 33 vs 32 without any drastic changes (eg engine conversions)

so yes 33 > 32 no debate! and.... 32 isnt hawt either, old interior, ghey ass bonnet bend (unless GTR) not to mention piss weak

I've had the R33 and R32 varients of the gtst and I think there's very little in it appart from taste in car looks. Both of my cars could run low 13's with the stock turbo.

have to admit, my mate has GTS4 RB20 stock with fmic + basics, had NO balls, he's just finished RB25 conversion i havent been in it as yet, but he says its BIG improvement. he's having partay tonight will have to snap a pic/drive before too many beers.

has the look of the R32 + RB25.. ftw

I've had the R33 and R32 varients of the gtst and I think there's very little in it appart from taste in car looks. Both of my cars could run low 13's with the stock turbo.

Ive also had both r33 and R32 GTST varients

exterior can come down to personal choice but interior the 33 is light years ahead

bolt on some mods and the rb20 will be left behind

the 33 gearbox will also handle much more abuse then a r32 gearbox

another thing is stock vs stock

r32 runs 10psi r33 runs 7psi?

R32 GTST 9-12k

R33 GTST 10-14k

R34 GT-T 23-25k

34 more torquey engine compared to the 33

stronger gearbox again

larger rear turbo housing then the 33 turbo (same as a 33 turbo compressor side but with a vg30 rear housing stamped as OP6)

slightly more top end power

R34 is awesome but for money you cant go past a 33 bang for buck

so mikes got the 32 going? :O

lol yeah, when I posted that it hadn't been tuned. Went for a ride on Sunday after it was tuned and man.. that thing is fkn FAST! (just ask Tristran.. he was trying to keep up and failed miserably :sick:)

You should come for a blat sometime, need to see how it goes against a real car :ban:

Edited by bubba
lol yeah, when I posted that it hadn't been tuned. Went for a ride on Sunday after it was tuned and man.. that thing is fkn FAST! (just ask Tristran.. he was trying to keep up and failed miserably :sick:)

You should come for a blat sometime, need to see how it goes against a real car :ban:

:O Its true... awesome car, poor Matty got left back on the horizon, at least i stayed in closeish lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Dunno what to tell you, when I look at it on Consult I can see this warmup timing map kicking in around 40C coolant temp and it sticks around for a while:  At part throttle on the normal base timing map it peaks around ~43 degrees of timing or something like that, this warmup timing map drops it to like 12-15 degrees. 
    • I don't think that's what you're seeing. Something else doing that. The only time I've seen it get so retarded is when it's trying to control idle (in which case we're not talking about mapped timing tagets anyway) and when there is an extreme coolant temperature sensor fault. The RB26 ECU is essentially the same as the 20 ECU and I knew that ging inside out. There is no facility for it to retard that heavily on cold start. The OEMs never used to do it back then. I mean, shit, the catalyst is abotu 3 miles down the exhaust anyway. Early light-off was just a twinkle in some EPA arsehole's eye back then, not a regular engine control strategy.
    • I must preface my comments with a general expression of ignorance. I have no specific knowledge of these NA automtaic things. I can only assume that the "steering wheel button" is for enabling the tiptronic controls. Wierd that it would even need/want a button for that... But anyway.... Was the car previously tiptronic? Did you put a new cluster in as part of all this?
    • Regardless, it doesn't seem wise especially on RBs to actually chase MBT. Timing scatter is the big one on stock CAS, even if that's fixed overshoot is worse than undershoot. 
    • It's all about reducing the overall output. Reduce the source of it, you have wayyyy less to deal with in every other step and trick you play with. It's why something like a modern vehicle, so VW, Audi etc, there's thousands of tables for the ECU to calculate what it should be doing with the engine.   Why would you NOT reduce emissions the most effective way possible, when it has very minimal tradeoff, AND manufacturers are always struggling to meet the current standards.
×
×
  • Create New...