Jump to content
SAU Community

Im Bored Of The 32.


BANGN
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nah I don't wanna drive yours to see the handling, just the 30DET (and do a burnout, jump out the door and leg it)

You don't know where I live right?

Paul, $1200

How bout I take you for a ride.. I mean.. drive :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*shrug* stock for stock a 33 is a better prospect than a 32 but for minimal mods I believe a 32 is better (upgrade parts off later skylines to be used). For massive mods then it comes down to personal preference, I know I'd prefer to waste heaps of money on a 32gtst, but that's just me :starwars:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless its a GTR

32 loses in every department

This aint a war its a slaughter!

Lucky I have a 32R then... and im sure Bubba's 25/30 will pwn all.

We haz teh power & teh good looks, the 33 is the ugly fat girl with a nice personality.

No 33 vs. 32 war, its a slaughter :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed it shall! Went for a ride in an interesting car last night Tristran.. you would like :(

Can't spill too many details coz it's secret squirrel shit, but if you're up for a random spontaneous cruise this weekend, let me know :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People who heavily modify there car like bubba i give respect

but were talkin 33 vs 32 without any drastic changes (eg engine conversions)

so yes 33 > 32 no debate! and.... 32 isnt hawt either, old interior, ghey ass bonnet bend (unless GTR) not to mention piss weak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah! I gotz rezpekt y0! :P

I find the 32gtst to be a good starter as far as getting into modding cars go. Lots of cheap upgrades off the newer skylines such as 25 turbo, 33 brakes etc. Then you get into motors out of the newer skylines, I opted for a different route and built something that doesn't come standard in any car :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed it shall! Went for a ride in an interesting car last night Tristran.. you would like :laugh:

Can't spill too many details coz it's secret squirrel shit, but if you're up for a random spontaneous cruise this weekend, let me know :D

so mikes got the 32 going? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People who heavily modify there car like bubba i give respect

but were talkin 33 vs 32 without any drastic changes (eg engine conversions)

so yes 33 > 32 no debate! and.... 32 isnt hawt either, old interior, ghey ass bonnet bend (unless GTR) not to mention piss weak

I've had the R33 and R32 varients of the gtst and I think there's very little in it appart from taste in car looks. Both of my cars could run low 13's with the stock turbo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

have to admit, my mate has GTS4 RB20 stock with fmic + basics, had NO balls, he's just finished RB25 conversion i havent been in it as yet, but he says its BIG improvement. he's having partay tonight will have to snap a pic/drive before too many beers.

has the look of the R32 + RB25.. ftw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had the R33 and R32 varients of the gtst and I think there's very little in it appart from taste in car looks. Both of my cars could run low 13's with the stock turbo.

Ive also had both r33 and R32 GTST varients

exterior can come down to personal choice but interior the 33 is light years ahead

bolt on some mods and the rb20 will be left behind

the 33 gearbox will also handle much more abuse then a r32 gearbox

another thing is stock vs stock

r32 runs 10psi r33 runs 7psi?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry guys, i haven't been reading all the pages to update myself...

please don't own me but um...

come on, R34's are pretty cheap now... would that ever be an option?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

R32 GTST 9-12k

R33 GTST 10-14k

R34 GT-T 23-25k

34 more torquey engine compared to the 33

stronger gearbox again

larger rear turbo housing then the 33 turbo (same as a 33 turbo compressor side but with a vg30 rear housing stamped as OP6)

slightly more top end power

R34 is awesome but for money you cant go past a 33 bang for buck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so mikes got the 32 going? :O

lol yeah, when I posted that it hadn't been tuned. Went for a ride on Sunday after it was tuned and man.. that thing is fkn FAST! (just ask Tristran.. he was trying to keep up and failed miserably :sick:)

You should come for a blat sometime, need to see how it goes against a real car :ban:

Edited by bubba
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol yeah, when I posted that it hadn't been tuned. Went for a ride on Sunday after it was tuned and man.. that thing is fkn FAST! (just ask Tristran.. he was trying to keep up and failed miserably :sick:)

You should come for a blat sometime, need to see how it goes against a real car :ban:

:O Its true... awesome car, poor Matty got left back on the horizon, at least i stayed in closeish lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... yes and perhaps no. It depends on what you mean by "spool". For most of us, the point that we would describe as where the turbo is "spooling" is the point where the wheel speed gets high enough for it to start making some boost. This is coincidentally around about the point where it starts making noise - hence the "spooling" sound. If that is what you mean, then no - the wastegate should still be shut at this point. The boost will still be way below the point where it should start opening. If, on the other hand, you mean "spool" as "reach full boost", then yes. At the point where the boost has reached target, then boost control has already started. The wastegate is already open, and has been for some time. Some short time, definitely, but still, some time. If you have no boost controller - just the wastegate actuator connected to the boost source, then you have a mechanical system working as a pressure balance. There is pressure on one side of the wastegate actuator's diaphragm from the spring, and pressure on the other side coming from the boost measurement location (the "source"). This is not a digital thing. The wastegate does not stay shut until the boost pressure reaches the spring "pressure". The spring will start to compress as soon as you start to apply any pressure onto it. This can be controlled somewhat by adding pre-load into the spring, but you cannot add enough preload to make it into a digital switch behaviour. The wastegate will crack open and start to leak exhaust out (and therefore not though the turbine) well before you reach the target boost pressure. Electronic (and some mechanical/pneumatic) boost controllers will act to prevent the boost source applying pressure to the actuator until just before you reach target boost, thus preventing the wastegate from creeping open. And some boost controllers will apply boost pressure on the spring side to further push it shut. And this can be be necessary because the exhaust pressure in the manifold also pushes on the wastegate valve and tries to open it and you cab get it leaking even without it being connected to the boost source.
    • A stand alone boost controller will not give you the control you need, unlike a modern ECU. Your boost will always naturally target the wastegate's opening pressure first, your controller then will allow you to add more boost as required.
    • I recently discovered that I could not remove the outer bolt on one of my rear UCAs. Looked like it was seized to the crush tube. It wasn't all that long since I had last had that arm out (I dunno exactly, but certainly <2 yrs), so I was a bit surprised. I thought I had stock bushes in the rear knuckles, so I ordered some new PU bushes and resigned myself to having to do some dismantlery....and some butchery. It was clear that the seized bush was going to need to have the bolt cut out of it and then possibly some more brutality after that. Upon getting the 3x arms on each side disconnected from the knuckles (with the exception of the seized one, of course), I discovered that I had in fact put PU bushes into the knuckles when I did the subframe conversion about 12-13 years ago. So, I say "Oh, good, I might not have to swap any of these others out". We set to work butchering the bolt out of the seized arm. Stainless blade in a big-arse Milwaukee recipro made short work of it, and also damaged the arm, which added a welding and grinding and painting step to the whole exercise. During the butchery it became clear that the bolt was not just seized but bent. Head scratching ensued, as it is hard to understand how that bolt could get bent. I did suffer a broken (stock) toe control arm on that side a few months ago, and drove some miles with some significant rear wheel self steer and lack of control, which probably was the cause. But it's still hard to understand how it would bend that bolt, rather than just bend the arm. But here's the start of the real discoveries. The crush tube was rusty as all shit. I mean seriously rusty. A little on the inside, contributing to the tube seizing to the bolt (along with the bend). But the outside had at least 2-3mm of compressed flaky iron oxide jammed in between the parent metal and the PU bush. This one was brutalised and still took some effort to get the PU off the crush tube. So I thought I'd inspect the others more closely. The one on the tension rod adjacent the bent one was first. I had to use a 2-jaw puller to get the crush tube out, and it took some effort. It came out looking like the first one. All 6 of them were the same, except for one that looked not too bad. Had some corrosion on it, but was mostly OK. There was also a significant amount of corrosion on the inner surfaces of the knuckles. They took some convincing with pointy tools to let go their grip on the inside of the holes they were in. There was no sign of the original (SuperPro) lube anywhere. I and my bro-in-law have never seen any crush tube end up looking like this. It was seriously like the car has spent time putting boats into the water at the boat ramp. So, it seems like the PU might have been bonded to the steel on both sides, which would have to make them work more like stock rubber bushes (where arm deflection results in twist inside the rubber). Despite this, I have never had cause to believe that they were so tightly bound up. The suspension moved up and down much as you'd expect. The car never made any noises in those bushes that would have led me to believe there was a problem. Maybe the rusty interfaces actually were "sliding". Anyway, lesson learnt. Even quiet, non-troublesome PU bushes should be inspected every now and then!
    • the boost controller allows you to adjust the opening of the wastegate (which only has one preset spring) I'm going to see how it acts on it
    • I studied the principle of wastegate to begin with. so if I understood correctly. the moment when the turbo "spool" is where the boost control begins. When the target level of "psi" is reached the wastegate opens to regulate the exhaust pressure passing through the turbo and thus control its speed and the rate of boost
×
×
  • Create New...