Jump to content
SAU Community

Just Built A New Pc


kralster
 Share

Recommended Posts

I got paid yesterday and last night was thinking how i could blow some money.

So today I went out and bought the parts for a new computer.

The only orignal thing from my last computer being carried over is the DVD drive and the case.

So this is what i got and the performance is phenominal.

Intel E8400 at 3.0GHz (I wanted the 8500 which is 3.16Ghz but they had no stock and if i really want that extra 150Mhz i can just overclock) $188

GIGABYTE EP45-DS4P Based on the Intel P45 chipset. Has all the features i wanted and them some. Lovely put together motherboard $191

CORSAIR RAM 4GB Umm not the most speedy or expensive stuff but much better than your usual generic $121

HDD WD 640GB SATAII with 16mb cache. Awesome HDD and i've set it up as a RAID0 array so i have 1.16TB of storage ohh yeah $94 each

THERMALTAKE 550W Modular powersupply. Modular is so nice as i only need to plug in the cables i need. 550W is enough for the video card and the two HDD so perfect. $90

GECUBE RADEON HD 4870 512MB DDR5 RAM I wanted the Gigabyte one but they had no stock this was cheaper and it's all much of muchness unbeliveable card $340

SAMSUNG 21.6 Inch 2253LW LCD monitor hell yeah baby this is nice i was going to get the cheaper Acer monitor but they guy at the shop said to me, with all the fancy parts you are buying get the better monitor. He even said he made less profit on the samsung monitor but he said it was much better 2ms response time $260

This computer is freaking awesome. My last computer i made was over 3 years ago so it's nice to finally have something really fast again.

I've also done a 180. I used to be an AMD proccessor guy and a NVIDIA graphics guy.

Now i'm using a Intel CPU and a ATi graphics card. But looking at reveiws and benchmarks Intel is the way to go. And the 4870 is smashing NVIDIA.

I considered going Quad core but not enough games support it to make it worthwhile IMO, i'd rather have a super fast dual core than an average speed quad core. And until games start supporting quad core you might as well stick with the dual. Only a few games support quad core and it makes a big difference but for the next year or two i think the dual will be fine espicially since it has such a high clock speed.

I've just finished installing the following

Orange Box - max everything, including AA and antroscopic filtering at 1680x 1050 runs awesome never slows down

Crysis - Everything on High and 1680x1050 wow this is incredible framerate around 45 - 50 most of the time dips down to 25 - 30 when a lot is happening. But the eye candy is amazing.

Just installing Unreal Tournament 3 at the moment. Then i'll chuck on Bioshock and a few other games.

So all up today i spent about 1400 bucks and have a crazy computer. Very very happy. And if i just got the one HDD and used my old monitor i would of saved even more. It's a great time to buy a new pc.

Also anyone reccomend any good PC games? Just not RTS haven't really enjoyed one since Dark Reign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi mate welcome to the world of high end PC's besides the graphics card mine sounds somewhat similar to yours. If you want some answers to your questions check out my thread about 8 threads below this one its called "Just bought kick a$$ gaming computer what games should i get" well something like that....

heaps of great suggestions in there. Well you already have got one awesome one.... Crysis, great graphics!

The other ones I have recently got my hands on is "World in Conflict", Call of Duty 4 (MUST HAVE IF YOU LIKE CRYSIS), company of heroes.

heaps more in my thread but strongly recommend you now get Call of duty 4 if you liked crysis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • we can only guess exactly what happened from our keyboards, but to me it looks like they were targeting 27 but the wastegate was too small or poorly controlled and the boost crept up, that is quite common
    • Good points!  Took those for granted - though I *did* actually give an example of winding boost up more than it had been before where I wasn't actually specifically looking for more peak power.  The Toyota Starlet dyno plot that I shared and mentioned showed an overlay from the previous tune it had and the one I'd redone, I left the boost targetting the same as the old tune but then after peak power I ramped boost up by a good 5psi or so over what the old tune had at the same rpm. The reason I felt comfortable with this (though the owner of the car had a "are you sure?" moment when I suggested it) is that the setup wasn't turbo limited, it was largely head sealing limited and the owner was a bit concerned as for the last few seasons he'd had issues with head lifting - sometimes not completing an event without having some headgasket issue, so he didn't want to run any more boost than it was. The reasons I was ok with raising the boost a good 5+psi MORE than that was that I left it where it was in the middle, and only increased it where VE (and therefore cylinder pressure vs psi) were dropping hard and I didn't stop the torque from dropping, just reduced the drop.  Well, there is that and the fact that the previous tuner had it overtimed by near 7degrees at peak torque - but that's another story haha.    I didn't really go into detail about that "turning it up more" thing but now you've mentioned the "not detuning", sometimes the boost *can* be turned up higher than you'd expect if the setup allows for it and you do it smartly.  I've tuned things to run 30psi on BP98 "safely" that a few years ago (or still?) people would cry that it was a stupid idea - but given they were well intercooled, low EMAP turbos and only doing that kind of boost where VE is dropping etc I was pretty confident it wasn't as cowboy as it sounded at face value and we never ended up with issues as a result of it.     
    • they choose the number of psi (27) around 4200? Could it produce more at this engine speed with the same turbo?
    • one thing escapes me, if the turbo spool provides the maximum boost and we can't control anything before that, how can the boost be higher by it alone.   here around 27 psi at 4200 then up to 32 psi at 6500 rpm   how does the tuner do this
    • I'm still not sure what you are trying to acheive, but I wanted to clarify something about Lithium's response to your question...   Only within certain limits. All of the examples Lithium gave were of detuning for a particular reason. Before the engine/turbo/wastegate combination has hit full boost, you can't increase it....the wastegate is shut and the turbo is pushing as hard as it can Once the combination has hit the target (controlled) boost, you generally have full control over whether it makes more or less boost, because it is being limited/reduced from its potential. This is generally done by controlling the wastegate In the top end, with an undersized turbo, it is possible you won't get to your target boost anymore if the turbo is choking up. In this case you cannot increase boost any more without changing the setup. No change in cost compared to any decent build, other than tuning time to get the engine to make less power than it is able to at a certain point
×
×
  • Create New...