Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Gday guys,

was hoping that you could share your views of the pros and cons of the above question. Obviously if a car is being used on the street as well as race an adjustable seat has functional advantages. But wouldnt this sacrifice some strength though? (i.e. in an accident)

Interested to hear your thoughts..

-Martin

Edited by schtein

I would say that it depends on the seat itself, some of the nicer seat like the bride's or recaro's that are reclinable but still fia approved would be more then fine in an accident. The other thing to concider is legalities as if the car its going into is a 2dr and still has back seats it would be illegal to put fixed back seats in

I have a fixed back in my 4dr 32.

Never gotten any police greife over it.

I lost 10kg out of the car from it.

It much keeps you much more stable than any reclinable I have been in.

It can be a little bit of a challenge at times to get in.. especially as it is my daily and if Iam doing something that requires much enter and exit out of the car it can ge quite frustrating..

In terms of accidents.. I too have thought about it.. but I came to the conclusion that its similar to a bikers helmet.. if you see a crack in the helmet.. the helmet took the impact.. not your head..

I wouldnt really be worried bout it.. if you buy an FIA approved one you'll be fine..

cams don't have an issue with adjustable seats for super sprints/hill climbs etc, but you must run fixed back if you are doing door to door racing

7. only with such replacement seat which in closed cars first registered with CAMS after 1 January 1980, and in which

the relevant regulations permit the replacement of the driver’s seat:

• incorporates a head restraint;

• does not incorporate adjustment of the rake of the squab;

Thanks guys, think the fixed back will be the go- for the drivers side at least. Passenger will go reclinable as i dont want to completely restrict access to the rear seats.

Cheers,

Martin

Just be careful, on that if you have ONE seat fixed back, your legally not allowed passengers in the rear.

Depends what state your in and what the cops are like i guess.

I mean you take a hit to the passenger side, you'll never get anyone out the drivers side

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And at over $2 per litre I'm starting to consider setting up a corn mash still and converting over to alcohol and running mine on it !  Up side of that is it all doesn't have to go into the car ! Win win !
    • H2 (for cars) will never happen. It's not reasonable for any number of reasons. It's also not reasonable for almost all of the industrial uses that the fanbois say that it will be used for, again for a large number of reasons. There are some cases where it will be good. But, even those will be massively hampered by the economics. The only way that H2 can be economic is if we somehow manage to get from where we are to the other side of the economic-valley-of-death in which no-one can operate. You need there to be sufficient renewable generated electricity to be available so that it is effectively free. Once you are there, you can do whatever the hell you want and hang the efficiency. But until you get there, the ever diminishing value of electricity makes it harder and harder to encourage businesses to build the new generation capacity, and they will simply stop investing in generation projects. (I kinda think there needs to be just government money spent on building the required capacity in a non-commercial way, similar to how the first fossil fueled grids were built, as national-government owned utilities. And probably some nuclear in there to start. But this all should have started 10-15 years ago to avoid the chasm of death that we face right now). Synth fuels will be much more likely, but will only occur is there is at least some renewable H2 production, because you need H2 to do it. And you need stacks of free (or at least extraordinarily cheap) energy because assembling molecules back into fuels is exactly the opposite process to burning the fuel, and the reason we burn fuels is because there is so much energy squeezed into each molecule. So you're somewhat subject to the same economic valley of death problem as above anyway. That is unless people are willing to pay the current equivalent of $5 or $6 per litre of petrol-ish liquid fuels. Can you imagine it? The squealing at $2 now is bad enough.
    • This is so cool. Get a dashcam that records audio and hopefully you'll catch it.  Maybe there's a brand or some kind of markings on the back ? Are the pics hand drawn? I love it so much.
    • Hahaha yep, point(s) taken. I just like seeing different things and an EV in an R32 is pretty different. I'm not on the EV band wagon, I'm waiting for synthetic fuels or hydrogen personally. 
×
×
  • Create New...