Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If i got a trap speed of 111mph, does that indicate that I should be able to pull a 12???

When i got that speed i had some traction issues and my 60ft time was crapola. I have some nice and wide 19"s on now, and on the road traction feels better.... Going to the strip saturday and I'm eager to see my new times...

If you want to delude yourself into thinking you have 215rwkw on a basically stock motor with an exhaust and some boost, then go ahead. The 2 dyno graphs pasted so far both have been @ RE.. so im suspecting a happy dyno like ash said.

run a high 12 @ 112mph and we'll believe you.

215rwkw with a stock RB25, stock turbo, but front mount and ECU and a bit more boost is completely believeable - I have seen it many times myself. Depends on the dyno though, if its one of those low reading ones that some Oz workshops seem to have then I can imagine 200rwkw being a bit harder to break.

I have heard someone claim >260rwkw on a stock turbo, THAT is a happy dyno.

Im not saying these stockers arent making their claimed dyno figures, but as mentioned id like to see some track results to back up these numbers.

where is sydneykid, id like to hear his input, he has buckets of experience especially with the gcg highflows and knows exactly what they will do. I think his last consensus was that a highflow with poncams is good for a MAX of around 265rwkw.

Yeah there is a thread similar to this on the NZ Nissan Silvia forum - there is a guy who must run on the highest reading dyno in the world. We have higher reading dynos than you guys in Oz on average by the sounds, but thats less to do with ours reading "high" than your Dyno Dynamics reading lower than virtually every other make of dyno.

NZSilvia thread for lols: http://nissansilvia.co.nz/nuke/modules.php...p=339978#339978

well I run 260rwkw with more to pull on a Rb25 neo engine why cant you guys do it? This was with highflow

I dont even have a FPR..

This is quite interesting now.

DO I READ THIS RIGHT......260RWKW WITH A STOCK TURBO HIGHFLOWED AND THE USUAL SUPPORTING MODS???? THATS PRETTY AMAZING ISNT IT? MY TUNER SAID I WOULDN'T GET ANYWHERE NEAR 250 AS ANYMORE TIMING THAN IT HAS AND IT KNOCKED......THIS IS GETTING INTERESTING, WHAT HAVE I STARTED????!!!!!

Fine.. Im getting new Actuator installed tommorow and radiator and ill take it back and get a print out..

Tuner is uni group.. And he said the car is running very safe.. Its going back to be retuned to show people what he can do at the dyno day..

The car has Tomei Cams.. So more flow etc.. gotta remember that.

This isnt a normal GCG highflow its precsion and runs 19psi bleeding off to 16psi .. and produces 262rwkw so if I held boost imagine the power. Hits full boost at 4g which is because of actuator. This turbo in a R33 with Cams ran a 250rwkw ask NYTSKY

I just watched an Auto at unigroup (which tell me it reads acurate as poss and they dont screw figures around, it may even read low they said) Pull 201rwkw.. Abo bob said himself that you lose power through a auto box.. Ill get the bloke to post a chart.

Edited by DECIM8
read my sig is this right?

Closer to around 220rwkw give/take.

I was 12.9 @ 110mph regularly and i wouldnt have had anymore than 220rwkw.

2rismo has run i *think* 109mph with similar power back in the day with a better ET cause he can point and shoot better :P

He can confirm that no doubt though

this is not a r34 story, but my brothers r33 series 2, was dynoed at ttwo seperate dynos, and both times his stock turbo pulled a 222.5 and a 225.8kw on 12psi...

supporting mods were

pod filter

power fc

full exhaust

front moutn

new forward facing plenum (( plazma one, (( only the top))

and it was running a basic 29 buck boost Tee for boost control.

could be a happy dyno, for both places. but ohwell

Edited by Silver_R34_GT-T
read my sig is this right?

R31Nismoid is on the money, with that MPH you should have closer to 220rwkw. i was flat 13 at 114mph with my dyno sheet reading 218rwkw with the HKS2530. Unless you drove it down the track in an unusual manner you should have a higher MPH for close to 250rwkw.

by the way the 60ft'er for that run was a shocking 2.3!

Edited by SLY33
on a diferent note. SORRY TO DOUBLE POST

but my r34 GTT auto,

has full 3 in exhaust, ( fake cat, etc

pod filter

front mount intercool

boost controller

spitfire coils

( other mods not perfomance no need to list)

basically can anyone recommend a good way to get a tune? i tried few months ago but was quoted 2200, not incliding tune...

someone said to me safc neo, but isnt hat just air fuel control?

I basically have same mods as you except installed an Apexi SAFC NEO ($350ish) and got it tuned ($250ish) - see my sig.

I'm amazed you can get a highflow over 250rwkw... I just don't believe 'you can take it to 280 if need be'... bigger wheels are fine but its still gotta get through that exhaust housing... mine was causing a restriction at anything over 6,000rpm at 190rwkw... I don't believe they can 'highflow' it to run another 80rwkw when the physical size is the main restriction...

Alright.. Ill post the dyno result.. After this radiator goes on.. BTW R34 Radiator for sale great condition.

I must admit I do think that the outlet will limit flow. we'll see

Edited by DECIM8

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As you're looking at using a Link ECU, then large injectors are not a problem. But there's not really any need to go 1000s on an RB20 unless you're planning >>600HP on E85, which would seem unlikely. There are other options for injectors. The Xspurt ones are available from a number of places and you can get them in the mid 600s and 725cc, which is probably a sensible place to be. These are all EV14 based. If you are not using the stock AFM (at all, which would be the case with a Link) then a large turbo intake pipe to suit the ATR turbos is not an obstacle, so you should use one instead of a highflow. Results will be better.
    • Hey guys,  I'm after some advice and this here is the best place to get it imo. I was a member a looong time ago under another account, with a lost email address. Its nice to jump back on and see some of the same names still giving good advice.  I mothballed my car when i moved to perth in 2013, and after getting towed across the nullabor a few times it has officially done more km's on a trailer than under its own power. Now that i have started the process of tidying up and modifying it, i see the fruit available (and the fruiterers selling the produce) is different than back in the day. hence my questions, as i used to 'know' what to get and now, i'm not so sure. Engine wise the car (92 gtst) has a walbro 255, k+n, fmic, cam gears and and turbo back 3"exhaust. Wish list is a Hypergear high flow or ATR43G1, Link G4x and some newer injectors before a tune up. My goals are modest, only low 200's power wise. i know i could achieve this with less, but i've been swapping out old for new where i can. Every cooling hose has been replaced, along with mani gaskets, WP, thermostat and radiator, fuel pump and timing belt, tensioner and idler, and i rebuilt the steering rack. Regarding the injectors, the fruiterers all seem to sell what used to be considered quite large injectors. There are a lot of options for bosch 1000cc EV14's, and i would like to know if that is a suitable choice for my build. Is modern injector design good enough to run these at the low duty cycles that i likely would be? is there a downside to running a too large injector these days? or, would there be an upside to running a smaller injector at higher duty cycle? I can see that there are smaller injectors still available, but the ones i have seen specifically marketed for RB's are pretty large (see: https://golebysparts.au/collections/fuel-rail-injector-kits/products/nissan-rb20-fuel-rail-bosch-980cc-1150cc-injectors-turbosmart-fpr800-regulator-kit), and i dont know enough about them to say one not marketed for RB's would fit or not. I have searched the forums, and amongst all the posts on older tech, I did see gtsboy recommend EV14's, but no size was mentioned... again, i'm not clear on if the smaller size bosch injectors are also EV14's as they do look similar.  also, if someone can recommend a tuner familiar with RB's in the Geelong or West Melbourne area i'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance guys. Cheers, Rowdy  
    • FWIW the depth of the groove in the rubber pad is not super essential, the blocks are rubber and squish a bit. If you are worried an angle grinder will make a deeper groove quick smart
    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
×
×
  • Create New...