Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ported head matched manifolds

jun guilds stano vavles

stock cams

stock cam gears and springs

baffled sump oil restrictors in the block cam cover plates

jun collar and oil pump

acl race bears mains and big ends

rev rods

cp pistions

1.3mm metal head gaskit

metal inlet manifold gaskits

pfc

stock cooler

stock inj stock fuel pump

stock air flow meters

stock dump pipes

front pipes 3 inch cat 3inch exhuast and cannon

stock turbos

os giken twin plate clutch

eboost 2 set to 13psi

262rwkw!!! 351hp

i was very surprised! can not thank anth enough at turbotechics more responce every were! and better on fuel! :D

thoughts ideas?

inj were 85% maxed

anth said to go inj and a bigger fuel pump next...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/231030-gtr-tuned-yesterday/
Share on other sites

not bad for old turbos! but yeah why retain so much stock gear? id be presuming you must have been quite happy with it in stock form, and just wanted a bit more from it.

what is the stock 32gtr gear, fuel system, and turbos good for power wise? The 34's are good for almost 300rwkw with just some basic breathing mods and an fc arent they?

Why are you risking a built motor by using stock turbos?

You obviously like to gamble :D

You need turbos before anything else. Fuel pump/Injectors co-incide with larger turbos. They are more than fine for the stockers... which again i stress... get rid of them

Im getting 212rwk on 9psi and little timing on a conservative run in tune, my turbos are stock size but have steel wheels in them. Built engine to

Other power mods are HKS dumps, apexi front's, 5zigen catback, stock cat, PFC, splitfires, hks duel power and arc induction box. So realyas far as power goes, exhaust, intake and very conservative tune...

Love the response :ermm:

Edited by bnr#@
Im getting 212rwk on 9psi and little timing on a conservative run in tune, my turbos are stock size but have steel wheels in them. Built engine to

Other power mods are HKS dumps, apexi front's, 5zigen catback, stock cat, PFC, splitfires, hks duel power and arc induction box. So realyas far as power goes, exhaust, intake and very conservative tune...

Love the response :ermm:

Your going to love MOAR boost after your run in. whats the plans for boost when done?

Your going to love MOAR boost after your run in. whats the plans for boost when done?

Plan is 16psi, the cam gears are yet to be adjusted to and a good tune to be done, should be fun :thumbsup:

Doing brakes first and a few suspension touch ups though so about a month away

ran out of money for turbos....

i like the responce of the stock turbos just wanted to see how much it made with the power fc and no dumps or cam gears first...

and i have seem to made 10kw more than others with cam gears dumps...and on only 13psi not 15 16psi.....

would be interesting i think with cam gears dumps and say 15psi but i dont wont to push the stock turbos....

ill run it at eastern creek next and see how i go...

would be very happy as it is, if i get a 11?

also what did it cost to put the steel wheels in the stock turbos? will be interesting to see what you make on them!

i think ill go spit fire coils next.... inj and a fuel pump...then decide on turbos or a single and air flows metres and a intercooler and make some big power :thumbsup:

Maybe 10rwkw more/1 less psi is dyno variance more than anything else than a solid difference :thumbsup:

A GTR driven hard (on stock turbos) can do mid 11's, it's been done before. However most likely low 12's for you unless you've had a good few outings before and can launch it right etc etc

Personally i wouldnt steel wheel turbos, with the R34 N1's, -7's, GT-SS being the price they are today... better off to just go down that road IMO rather than fixing up the stockers with steel wheels. And then you'll get a little more peak power (well, about 40rwkw or so) with pretty much the same response too :ermm:

i think i have the take off down patt now around 6000rpm seems to work well :thumbsup:

i was looking at gtss befor but now that it made 260kw is it worth it for 40kw? would be interesting to go in a gtr with them to see....

if i go cam gears would i see 10kw more?

i think i have the take off down patt now around 6000rpm seems to work well :P

i was looking at gtss befor but now that it made 260kw is it worth it for 40kw? would be interesting to go in a gtr with them to see....

if i go cam gears would i see 10kw more?

ye as stated, cam gears is more mid-range repsonse than anything else.

As for 40kw? Your talking more like 70kw with GT-SS/N1/-7 :P

310-330rwkw is around about the end result from most peoples setups over 20psi

i think i have the take off down patt now around 6000rpm seems to work well :D

i was looking at gtss befor but now that it made 260kw is it worth it for 40kw? would be interesting to go in a gtr with them to see....

if i go cam gears would i see 10kw more?

As Nismoid said even more then 40kw though it is also more reliable...

You don't have to worry about the ceramic wheels at all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
×
×
  • Create New...